WHO is going to show you how to win w/ positive R.O.I. Long term

Reply #159

Lucky Loser — Sat, 16 Mar 2019 17:32:47 GMT

Okay, garyo, it seems we're on the same page in terms of generalizing this ROI business because you first introduced garbage bags and food items in relation to a ROI and I just simply placed a non monetary value on them. On a serious note, though, there are lots of specifics to be factored into a successful and consistent ROI when it comes to these small games...and it's nothing magical. The value you receive on something usually parallels what you put into it based on my personal experience. Wh... [ More ]

Reply #158

garyo1954 — Sat, 16 Mar 2019 03:07:49 GMT

Tell me I didn't read that. You're confusing satisfaction and tons of waste with a monetary value.

Here's the ROI formula.....

ROI = Net Profit / Total Investment * 100

So seriously, an ROI might offer some idea how your predictions are doing, but has nothing to do with if you might win MegaMillions, or Powerball, or your state lottery, or anything else. Likely, most, if not all major jackpot winners were operating at pennies on the dollar return until they won. That means an R... [ More ]

Reply #157

Lucky Loser — Sat, 16 Mar 2019 02:00:49 GMT

Take garbage bags.We BUY garbage bags to throw away.

Your ROI here is that you don't have a ton of waste piled on the INSIDE of your house garbage container, or, a bunch of dead leaves lying around smothering your lawn grass. This is your ROI on that.

What's the ROI on McDonald's fries?

If a person likes and eats McDonald's fries then, their ROI on this is SATISFACTION and this also applies to the rest of the items mentioned. ROI isn't always monetary. We drink liquors and beers for th... [ More ]

Reply #156

Stack47 — Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:16:25 GMT

and the old guy down the street is an excellent example of why R.O.I. really doesn't apply to playing lottery games. It's obvious large jackpot winners have (or should have) a positive R.O.I., but because we can only deduct losses up to what we win, even the IRS doesn't expect lottery players to have a positive R.O.I.

Reply #155

GuesssWork — Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:12:20 GMT

Give the system a shot why not and post your findings if you dont mind.

Reply #154

GuesssWork — Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:41:41 GMT

30 Grand gone just that fast

anyone that has a winning system is not selling sorry folks

Reply #153

garyo1954 — Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:20:14 GMT

Here's a monkey wrench:

Anybody concerned about ROI probably shouldn't be playing. Put your money in a piggy bank.

If you just look many things don't have an ROI but it don't stop us from buying them. Take garbage bags. We BUY garbage bags to throw away.

What's the ROI on McDonald's fries?

Twinkies?

Or potato chips?

Cigarettes?

And yet most still throw $5 or more away each day without a whimper on things we don't need. Sort of like that $24 boat that hangs on the... [ More ]

Reply #152

Stack47 — Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:20:41 GMT

BUT why spend $30K when you can get it for $87 (plus $5.95 shipping).

I didn't know they had the same type of lottery games in 1802 we have today so spending even $87 on without any real details isn't very smart.

Reply #151

Mr-B 216 — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:54:14 GMT

I did find 3 web sites selling this system . Two of them are selling as amber described, $29, 997.00 for the whole system, or $25.00 for 5 picks, up to $216.00 for 50 picks....BUT why spend $30K when you can get it for $87 (plus $5.95 shipping).

DO NOT pm me for web site details as I will not share that info. I blocked out the name of the system, but you can find this same info using Google if you really want to throw your money away.

Reply #150

Artist77 — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:20:33 GMT

Amber, that is a scam.

Reply #149

amber124 — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:00:20 GMT

What do you think would happen if his claims were really true, and they may be true who knows, and then he turned around and gave it away for free to everybody to see. If his claims are actually true, all the lotteries will be bankrupt Within a very short time and the lotteries would shut down. That's why he charges $25 for 5 lines and $30,000 for the whole system.

I will be buying five lines for 25 bucks as a one-time test to see how well it does.

Reply #148

amber124 — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:57:34 GMT

So you mean that because you and others haven't found it on the internet that this person doesn't exist?

I answered your last question, and then you baffle me with this statement of yours. Is this a puzzle I'm supposed to decipher? LOL

Reply #147

MillionsWanted — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:20:58 GMT

As I turned through the worn old pages I discovered several pages of notes that the previous owner had left that dated back to 1942.

I had to rub my eyes, I couldn't believe the information I was reading!

There were notes from a man who had made a fortune! This was not any information that was available to the public or that has ever been talked about to date.

Reply #146

GuesssWork — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:16:52 GMT

Question if the person selling the book for 30,000 has won millions with the book why is he selling it for? Let me guess he made a copy for himself and decided now he wants to help out the next guy haha LOL okaay ..

Reply #145

amber124 — Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:36:01 GMT

Where did I write that he scribbled notes about playing the lottery? You are inserting words that I never wrote. All I said was he scribbled notes that's all.

Reply #144

amber124 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:26:47 GMT

My only reasoning tells me perhaps either he feels this is the only way to curb the amount of people he exposes this to in order to not collapse the lottery, or...some men in black told him to do have the aforementioned mindset if he wants to continuing living...

On the other hand...why would anyone spend 30 grand to win millions over time? They obviously have figured it out financially to a point where 30 grand is pocket money...

Having said that..a few years ago..and LP member prove... [ More ]

Reply #143

MillionsWanted — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:11:22 GMT

The original owner had scribbled down notes about playing lotteries when lotteries did not exist?

And why should he sell these notes for $30,000 when he's already a multi millionaire with his fantastic system

Reply #142

amber124 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:06:54 GMT

He says the book is about horse racing, but that wasn't the wow moment . The owner of the book scribbled notes within the book and that information was the key.

The book was from 1942...i guess they had horse racing back then..lol...I don't know..

Edit: also...I'm sure he's talking about recent wins like the past ten years give or take...

Reply #141

MillionsWanted — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:01:50 GMT

First lottery on mainland USA came in 1964. Not sure his secrets are worth the money.

Reply #140

Stack47 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:51:59 GMT

I read your first point.

1) I know with a 100% certaintythat not any member of this website is claiming profits.

The silly thing is insinuating you read 5,685,977 post and then saying none of them claimed profits. I doubt anybody is making a good living playing pick-3 or any other lottery games, but that doesn't prove it's impossible to do. As a matter of fact the 50% of pick-3 and pick-4 sales the lotteries keep also means they are paying out 50% making it possible for a few players to... [ More ]

Reply #139

amber124 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:20:00 GMT

Below is his story...

How I discovered a Never Before Shared, Lottery Secret that allowed me to become one of the Luckiest Men on Earth. ? It was a summer's night in late June, I had decided to pick up some new books for myself at my local antique book store. I seemed to be drawn to this old dusty book way in the back of the antique store. It had a very interesting design on the side of the cover. The book itself was an old copy of horse racing statistics but that wasn't what was special... [ More ]

Reply #138

grwurston — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:16:34 GMT

Too bad you backed out. I was looking forward to the challenge. All you had to do was pick the key digits nothing else. Should have been easy for you, right? Guess not. Oh, well.

Reply #137

amber124 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:07:21 GMT

I found a person on the internet a few weeks ago who is the selling a system for $30,000. Supposedly years ago he was musing through a bookstore and found an old book that was about some kind of math and probability and such.

He claims that he's won millions of dollars using the information from the book. If you don't have $30,000 to spend, LOL, you can buy numbers from him. I forgot to mention that he only sells numbers for the big games not the Pick 3 or Pick 4.

I forgot the exact detail... [ More ]

Reply #136

partlycloudy07 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:30:12 GMT

Reply #135

a562soldier — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:06:28 GMT

Stack47, are you serious? You don't read and comprehend really well do you silly man? See my first point again. The FACT you and everyone else is on here to get ideas on how to win is enough to provide a common sense notion that not any member is profiting. You might have a win here and there, but that's as good as it gets.

grwurston, I will not partake in your petty challenge. You just stated you want to predict two digits and dug yourself in your own hole.

2 Digits = 110 combin... [ More ]

Reply #134

grwurston — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:51:01 GMT

You want to do a pick one digit, that's fine with me. But I'll tell you what we'll do. Pick 2 key digits, that are good for both draws (not 2 for each draw) for the next day only. All you have to do is be right on one draw or the other. Just the key digit. You do California, I'll do Maryland. Post them every day. One month, 2 months, a year, I don't care.

I've been doing it on the Md. Pick 3 thread for years. Mine are already out there for tomorrow.

Reply #133

Stack47 — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:24:01 GMT

It's next to impossible to determine the percentage of active LP members making trying to prove none of all the members are showing a profit silly at best. Not knowing or talking to almost 200,000 members to see if at least one of them has a positive long term R.O.I. is mission impossible.

I know with a 100% certainty that not any member of this website is claiming profits.

That's an extraordinary claim requiring at least some sound evidence, where is yours

Reply #132

a562soldier — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:40:01 GMT

grwurston, doubt all you want old man, but like I said prove it. Talk is cheap. Oate and many others on here claim to be this and that and have nothing to show. Where is that math genius at anyways

Reply #131

Soledad — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:26:27 GMT

It s true that the cost vs payout will always be on the side of the game. The best you could probably hope for and do in this game is X10 vs cost. It s also true that out of all gamblers nationwide , only 1% or less than 1% are actually able to make a living out of it. And it s very tough for them, but they do do it. And yes they do keep pretty hush about it. But last year I did make a profit. I honestly made a little over 20 grand last year profit, which is pretty good in my opinion. It s not b... [ More ]

Reply #130

grwurston — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:40:20 GMT

There's 196,641 members here, and not one is making a profit? I doubt that.

Reply #129

a562soldier — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:23:52 GMT

I read this post with an open mind and here's my perspective.

1) I know with a 100% certainty that not any member of this website is claiming profits. Otherwise, they just wouldn't be hanging out on here trying to learn.

2) At the retail level, no one is making a profit. I don't care what anyone says. The payouts just don't allow that to happen. The losses will outweigh the wins, always.

3) Online, I think its totally possible with fixed $150 payouts. But one thing to consider is do the... [ More ]

Reply #128

Soledad — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:23:16 GMT

Um seriously though, I don t mind smiling girls with feathers. No really, that d be fine by me. But I guess if you win enough, they come no matter what. Knock knock lol..

Reply #127

grwurston — Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:14:23 GMT

The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

Reply #126

aquariuslottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:34:58 GMT

IT IS A RANDOM GAME YOU CAN NOT OVERCOME THE ODDS NOT EVEN IN A SMALL

WAY OR MANNER.

2 issues here:

1) The concept of overcoming the odds - people have different ideas regarding this: a profit, a percent of return, jackpot, whatever else. Its a subjective matter.

2) The definition of randomness states that in a pool of events any event, at any given time, has an equal chance of occurring. End of definition. Everything else regarding randomness is an inventive (read: wishful) interpre... [ More ]

Reply #125

aquariuslottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:54:06 GMT

Playing lotteries is not about penny-pinching. I already stated this before - too expensive for you, find a cheaper pastime, don't waste you timer playing a buck here, a buck there hoping for a fortune. Not likely to happen, even in Pick 3.

But I always balance what I can realistically achieve (no wishful hoopla) against what I should pay for it. Does not look good? Ditch it and try something else. To give you an example in Pick 3: my current favourite, based on simulations, is 56 tickets A G... [ More ]

Reply #124

Lucky Loser — Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:07:02 GMT

What is it that you know that no one else does

Glad you asked and the answer is 'nothing.' I have access to the same draws and information that any other member-player here or anywhere else does. As well, I must abide the same 'lottery configuration' you speak of which, I suppose, you mean in relation to the pre and/or post draw tests etc. I believe it's all in how a given player perceives what's actually taking place in the game and how that player counters what's happened...how well they co... [ More ]

Reply #123

NumberRunner — Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:58:24 GMT

people are trying to factor into this 0-9 game, it seriously baffles me to the point of unbelief. 90% of it has absolutely no place in the game while the remaining 10% is 100% misapplied.

What is it that you know that no one else does that can be applied to help in obtaining small frequent wins??

None of this will help you even if you applied it in a so called manner to win.

HHL,EEO, SUM, VTRAC

ZTRAC THIS TRACK THAT.

ROOTS BEETS PEARS PLUMS

SHORT STACK TALL STACK

F... [ More ]

Reply #122

Lucky Loser — Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:15:44 GMT

Look for practical (and often simple) solutions

Here's the gospel of the whole deal, in my personal opinion. Man, when I look around sometimes and see all the formulas and exotic approaches people are trying to factor into this 0-9 game, it seriously baffles me to the point of unbelief. 90% of it has absolutely no place in the game while the remaining 10% is 100% misapplied. It's like looking at a big, beautiful bridge on the outside but is completely structurally unsound underneath and on th... [ More ]

Reply #121

aquariuslottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2019 03:44:10 GMT

That's my approach as well. Look for practical (and often simple) solutions that may contribute to better (i.e. more frequent) winning while reducing cost. Always try to max you money. After all, that's the purpose of gambling, isn't it? Some may play for the pure joy of loosing but it's not my ball game.

Aquarius

Reply #120

eddessaknight — Sat, 09 Mar 2019 00:36:06 GMT

WANNA BET?

In 20 years at gambling ground zero in Las Vegas, I have found what serious non-entertainment players wANT:

*98% want what WORKS, they don't want Player's Points, more air miles, buffets, rooms beverages, smiling girls w/feathers, etc BOTTOM LINE: they want to know how to win (without encumbrances) and they don't worry about what is right or wrong in the gambling world where players aren't interested in whether something is true or not, or whether they believe it or not, bu... [ More ]

Reply #119

eddessaknight — Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:42:18 GMT

Stack

Reply #118

eddessaknight — Sat, 16 Feb 2019 01:31:25 GMT

Infinity looks Black or White to Finite Eyes.

Ancient wisdom says there are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.

Reply #117

lottologix — Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:10:04 GMT

Would any one be able to share their winning idea?

I have noticed where at times in my state that they seemed to stop selling certain numbers. Its usually pick 3 triples. Where the machine simply did not. accept the ticket or print the tickets out.

It's just an idea but if there were a publicly shared method, I think that after a certain number of combinations were sold the lottery would just stop selling those number combinations. Just an idea tho.

Reply #116

Stack47 — Mon, 11 Feb 2019 05:37:13 GMT

Some people think that they deserve to cash out their $12,000 in chips

Probably because they never heard of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970. I had a really good run in Sparks a few years ago and the Craps pit boss explained it to me. Never ever cash in more than $9000 in a 24 hour period.

it's federal law that requires the casino to see your ID (and make notes of your name and address, naturally)

Not many people walk from table games with over $10,000, but there are some, guests of the... [ More ]

Reply #115

Tucker Black — Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:50:41 GMT

It is a requirement that you show ID when requested. You must have ID on you in order to be in a casino, even if you're 85 years old. Refusing to show ID was a bad idea.

Also, if you have more than $10,000 in chips and wish to cash them out, and you refuse to show ID (which you will be asked for, pursuant to Title 31), you will be barred from playing and you will not get your chips cashed out until you come back to the casino with your ID. This is federal law. Of course, it's illegal for the... [ More ]

Reply #114

eddessaknight — Sun, 10 Feb 2019 23:12:03 GMT

Appreciate the understanding and excellent commentary Lucky Loser, et al-

Aficionados here is yet another interesting case to consider:

Cheated gamblers are turning the tables on casinos

Lawyer Bob Nersesian, outside of The Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas.

If the chips fall against them, serious gamblers call Bob Nersesian.

The 58-year-old attorney is the go-to guy for card sharks who claim they ve been roughed up or feel they ve been cheated by the house. His cl... [ More ]

Reply #113

Lucky Loser — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 20:53:50 GMT

This is a great entry by eddessaknight and I especially like how it consistently reaffirms what myself and others have discussed here. As bad and unfair as it is, the house simply doesn't welcome players that implement a methodical approach to winning with any reasonable consistency and profit. To really understand their reasoning, though, one must think in terms of it as being their own casino with a player seemingly winning all the time. In my opinion, the imminent risk is that they'll share t... [ More ]

Reply #112

Tucker Black — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 07:35:36 GMT

Very interesting! Thanks

Reply #111

eddessaknight — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:02:17 GMT

'au contrair, mon ami' we know gaming practices have improved because of litigation but they haven't gone away.

This is a public forum, that in it's scope concerning confidentiality has time/space limitations, also we are open to lottery and casino visitors.... therefore, unfortunately, not so free for unrestricted revelations.

That being said, I cannot delve or be baited into a debate with anyone who isn't known to me personally.

So with one thing taken with another, in brief, if one... [ More ]

Reply #110

eddessaknight — Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:28:14 GMT

Famous people s success against all odds

~ Marilyn Monroe had a rough upbringing and was placed in several foster homes growing up. Later she was considered a failed model with little hopes for success. Her modeling agents told her she would never make it as a model, and that she should consider being a secretary. Despite being told she was a failure most her life she went on to pursue her dreams and became a national success. Marilyn Monroe s character as a dumb blonde was an act,

Reply #109

Tucker Black — Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:03:17 GMT

Casinos don't back room people any more. They got sued and now the player will make more money in a lawsuit than they could possibly win counting cards.

Casinos don't use a slight of hand manipulator on a card counter. They can simply bar the player, or more commonly, simply re-shuffle the deck. If you're counting cards and every time the count turns positive and you increase your bet, and then the dealer re-shuffles before you have a chance to play a hand with a big bet, the count gets destr... [ More ]

Reply #108

eddessaknight — Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:32:29 GMT

Thank you partlycloudy07 for chiming in on casino reactions to winning.

The casino mentality is that card counting that gives a player advantage is not gambling; the idea is that the casino is not gambling and any methodology that over rides their expectant $$$$ reality has to be dealt with by repressive countermeasures which sometimes includes aggressive back rooming, banning player and cheating. In some establishments they employ a highly trained slight of hand manipulator (on the level of

Reply #107

eddessaknight — Mon, 04 Feb 2019 21:32:18 GMT

Thanks for the sensible keno king way strategy model Tucker Black

Hopefully some keno aficionados will test and report on their applied results.

Don't look at the boards after you're done playing! LoL ~TB

Solid psychological advice for any game, anytime, anywhere!

Nota Bene:

It's said by senior veteran players, that the safest place to be, when under attack, is the keno parlor because nothing ever hits there.....

Bonne Chance All-

~EK

Reply #106

eddessaknight — Sun, 03 Feb 2019 23:20:39 GMT

Always appreciate your hands on reality input, Stack

Keno numbers that appeared together over a short period. knowing which numbered appeared the most over a short time isn't much help unless you're playing a 1-spot. ~S

Just try yo get a long term 6-7- or 8 spot frequency report over 300 games, no dice to trend pattern players. I would love to know what 8 spots fell over last 1000 games, there are practical limits to extremes, now wouldn't you?

Aye, Power of 1; one spot 3-1 payout is c... [ More ]

Reply #105

eddessaknight — Sat, 02 Feb 2019 23:46:05 GMT

Thank you Soledad for the prime numbers contribution which always has significance in any game.

In kind reciprocation here are a number group phenomena that plays exceptionally well, not only in Keno but also in Roulette (have not checked it on racing yet

Alpha-Numeric playing occurance tactic :

# 14 - 16 - 18 - 28

Straightforward: when one number occurs observe how other numbers will show shortly after, wagering strategy will depend on progressions and bankroll

Now don't risk a... [ More ]

Reply #104

partlycloudy07 — Sat, 02 Feb 2019 16:33:26 GMT

I'm pretty good at counting cards myself .......so I had to LOL at your comment yes if your somewhere and your winning too much they invite you to make a like a tree and LEAVE lol its best to lose a hand or so not to draw attention to yourself

Reply #103

Tucker Black — Sat, 02 Feb 2019 10:05:12 GMT

One of the problems with casino Keno is there are Keno boards everywhere in the casino so sometimes you see your numbers drawn after quitting.

Don't look at the boards after you're done playing! LOL

If you think that one particular number will show up, do a way ticket with that spot (a king ) plus others. For example, circle just 25, circle 31-34, circle 51-54, and you can buy two 5 ways (25+31-34 and 25+51-54), one 9 way (25,31-34,51-54), and optionally, two 4 ways and one 8 way... [ More ]

Reply #102

Stack47 — Sat, 02 Feb 2019 00:05:44 GMT

The fact that the casino is happy to hand you a copy of the most frequently chosen numbers in the past, free of charge, should tell you that the information is totally meaningless.

LP has drawing statistics on almost every drawn lottery game, but I'll bet it's difficult to find where the top 3, 4, 5, or 6 most frequent digits or numbers appeared together in the same drawing. But I had success playing way tickets using Keno numbers that appeared together over a short period. knowing which num... [ More ]

Reply #101

Soledad — Fri, 01 Feb 2019 03:12:14 GMT

2 , 3, and 5 are the prime numbers. 2 with 8, 3 with 9, 8x9x5=360.

Reply #100

eddessaknight — Thu, 31 Jan 2019 23:28:50 GMT

Tucker Black, et al-

Appreciate the courteous response

Respectably, as the entire universe and its manifestations are inter connected, everything matters.

The entire universe has to be understood as a single undivided whole.

David Bohm, physicist (The Undivided Universe)

Sure the casinos have the edge, they built it into the games non-mutable, but odds and probabilities are not synonymous, so don't let the odds betray you as they can be surpassed. Relative to keno seemigly hor... [ More ]

Reply #99

Tucker Black — Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:01:06 GMT

No one can overcome the odds. The people who win are just lucky. It doesn't matter which numbers you pick. Any one of the 80 ping pong balls in the hopper can be drawn with exactly the same chance of being drawn.

The Baccarrat and Roulette past result displays are there to fool people into playing, thinking that they will have an edge if they play based on past results. The fact is that IT DOESN'T MATTER!

I do play progressive keno when the jackpot gets high enough, but that's pretty rare.... [ More ]

Reply #98

eddessaknight — Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:22:20 GMT

Hi Tucker Black, et all-

Appreciate your interest, however the current keno inquiry is about R.O.I. players who have overcome the odds and could kindly share their How To .... wisdom with the forum readers.

Certainly how not, to lose more i.e as with multiple frequency numbers matter. And the beautiful Atlantis Casino,Reno has one of the best progressives, second only to legendary but non-glamorous El Cortez Casino,LV in keno options opportunities. Still you can't blame a man for trying...... [ More ]

Reply #97

Tucker Black — Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:15:05 GMT

Yesterday someone at the keno lounge asked me for the most frequently drawn numbers in the last 20 games. There is a feature on our computer where we can print that out.

The fact that the casino is happy to hand you a copy of the most frequently chosen numbers in the past, free of charge, should tell you that the information is totally meaningless.

He used the numbers to create a 9 spot progressive bet, and guess what... he lost! LOL

Reply #96

eddessaknight — Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:56:50 GMT

No, NO, NOT ONE WILL COME FORWARD TO SHARE WITH US?

NOT ONE!

EVEN AFTER ALL THIS TIME......

Reply #95

eddessaknight — Fri, 04 Jan 2019 21:01:56 GMT

Many thanks for the important illuminating contributions Lucky Loser bobby

Remember, just because one doesn't believe in a esoteric methodology, it doesn't mean it's a joke or it does not work. Virtually improbable to overcome negative odds with conventional linear casino math - will require a verifiable out of the box math solution for long term R.O.I.

Don't let the odds betray you.....

The wise seek .

Don't give up the discovery search....

An ancient secret order that holds hidd... [ More ]

Reply #94

bobby623 — Tue, 01 Jan 2019 03:48:45 GMT

As my final LP post for 2018, I'll say this:

Folks who view many actual drawings have to conclude that the chaos in the lottery machines can be defeated.

All one needs is a rational set of tracking charts that 'mimic' the chaos, which is, the arranging and rearranging of the balls until the proper number of balls get through the escape hatch.

Then it becomes a matter of analyzing the trends reflected in the data strings created by the charts and finding the right answers to one simple q... [ More ]

Reply #93

Lucky Loser — Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:56:28 GMT

Lots of good stuff here that I wholly agree with. The problem has been accurately identified many times over the years which is, as accurately stated here, that players are looked upon 'disdainfully' and ignorantly in terms of what the operators already know regarding their own odds...the house odds. These odds, for whatever reason, aren't supposed to be eclipsed by so called 'average players' but, there are those that figure out ways to bring the odds down to size. In my honest opinion though,... [ More ]

Reply #92

Tucker Black — Mon, 31 Dec 2018 22:40:29 GMT

Wheel clocking is a joke.

Card counting works. I do it myself on a regular basis. It doesn't matter if it's 1 deck or 6 decks. The procedure is the same. Where card counting doesn't work if it they use a continuous shuffling machine. The deck needs to be dealt until about 75% done, no shuffling in the middle, and card counting works. The key is to not be too aggressive about it and get banned as a result.

Reply #91

eddessaknight — Mon, 31 Dec 2018 21:55:18 GMT

Hey str8ca$hhomie

Thank you for your input bro-

Naturally, , notice the long line of players who have the 'Right Stuff' (Thomas Wolf) willing to share their hidden advantage game plans

The secret for my influence has always been that it remained secret.

~Salvador Dali

BOTTOM LINE: CASINO MENTALITY

All gaming operators want to increase the player's noise to signal (S/N) ratio

This comes from the management mentality where as players are looked upon disdainfully as suckers... [ More ]

Reply #90

str8ca$hhomie — Sun, 30 Dec 2018 17:40:42 GMT

Unfortunately, the answer is KNOW-ONE

Reply #89

Shady1 — Sat, 29 Dec 2018 23:21:44 GMT

I concur. There's nobody here that's good enough to win that much, but fake winners are abound.

Reply #88

eddessaknight — Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:05:40 GMT

WHO is going to show you howto win w/ positive R.O.I. Long term?

Well, it should be abundantly clear by now, that those in the 'KNOW' - virtually can't or won't spill the Secret of 'how to' beans with us :-(

A small cadre of successful Vegas low pro players would rather give up their children first, putting a 45 caliber gun to the head or court warrants have been tried without results

Now, hypothetically, after all it took to finally overcome the odds, the trials errors effort et... [ More ]

Reply #87

aquariuslottery — Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:03:50 GMT

Hi lottointuitive,

Thank you for the invitation but at the moment I will not be getting involved into new simulations as they are time consuming and I just started a new Pick 3 project which I want to complete before spring (yes, it may take that long as I'm diving into unknown waters of Pick 3 predictions that I've never looked at before).

However I did run a simulation for Pick 3 on real numbers for almost a year from November 2016 to October 2017 (49 weeks). The weekly results were reco... [ More ]

Reply #86

LottoIntuitive — Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:13:21 GMT

Ultimately it's achieve your goals and get results however you get them. I encourage you to post at least 10 detailed predictions using your best strategies in my forum so we can see your track record over time. There's nothing better than being able to provide undeniable evidence. Feel free to invite any predictor you feel is able to reach the low target of a 20% ROI within 10 predictions.

Reply #85

rcbbuckeye — Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:39:08 GMT

It didn't hurt that she first won a Texas Lotto jackpot providing the money needed to buy all those $20 scratchers.

Reply #84

str8ca$hhomie — Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:36:57 GMT

Hidden in the archives of Lottery Folklore is the story of Joan Ginther, a math-savvy student of Statistics with a Ph.D from Stanford University. It has been said by some that she not only figured out the algorithm used in printing Scratch-off tickets, but that she also had knowledge of the Lottery Commission's method of distributing the cards to the stores. Of course this is all speculation or is it ? Interested parties want to know

Reply #83

aquariuslottery — Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:02:46 GMT

A couple of comments on your post.

1) I don't believe that using only one prediction method, no matter how successful it appears, is the key to success. From November 2016 to October 2017 I ran a Pick 3 simulation on real numbers taken from Wisconsin Pick 3, to find out how prediction methods perform over time. A analysed about 15 methods and results were computed weekly. Only very rarely a method was the best performer from week to week, there were constant fluctuations between the winners.... [ More ]

Reply #82

LottoIntuitive — Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:30:51 GMT

Just my two cents.

Players and predictors have different values. Most players just want someone to give them numbers to play and predictors want to master creating the best strategy possible. A predictor is only as good as their track record. I don't know any predictor besides myself that post their stats. With the way the lottery post stats page is set up there is no way to tell who is the best predictor is. You have to go back and look at the history of their post. If I'm going to invest my... [ More ]

Reply #81

aquariuslottery — Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:16:49 GMT

Agree, just a story, one of many I`ve seen on LP over the years.

In my system I can easily win $3500 per week. Don`t ask about the cost - I`m not going to tell you. But you don`t have to be extremely smart to easily figure that out.

Aquarius

Reply #80

aquariuslottery — Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:07:04 GMT

Why would someone have to spend $2400 a week to win $1200?

The same reason why people spend $5000 in casinos to win $500. They see only the winning, not the cost.

You could hit a $1 box on a P4 double 3 times and get $1200

$1200 Is less then three P3 straight hits a week.

Occasionally this may happen, consistently - no. The keyword is `could`.

I ran a simulation for straight wins in Pick 3 (some time ago). It hit 6 straights in 30 plays. Wins $3000, cost $1800, profit $1200. Happe... [ More ]

Reply #79

winoneday — Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:31:51 GMT

Reply #78

Suean — Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:54:03 GMT

Dream number pls for sister in law

Reply #77

Soledad — Wed, 05 Dec 2018 02:11:25 GMT

Reply #76

Soledad — Wed, 05 Dec 2018 01:55:20 GMT

It seems that most want a sure thing with the idea of random. Well I guess the answer would be then you or Tony Montana haha. But I ll give respect to Stack47. He s always been good here. (Latin dative tense to/for

Reply #75

Stack47 — Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:30:59 GMT

At the end of the day odds mean nothing to the MM and PB players and that includes the chances of the jackpot being won. The KY pick-3 $1 straight pays $600 but because they keep the $1 bet, players don't get a W-2G.

Reply #74

Tucker Black — Sat, 01 Dec 2018 05:04:37 GMT

to 1 or for 1 are normally used to express the win amount, not the probability of winning.

For example, in blackjack, a winning hand pays 1 to 1 a.k.a. even money. Bet $5, win $5 (and that's a net win $5, not $5-$5 for a net zero).

If you get a blackjack, you win 3 to 2 meaning your $5 bet wins $7.50 (3/2*5). The crummy blackjack games pay 6:5, where your $5 bet wins 6/5*5=$6. $6 is less than $7.50 which is why 6:5 BJ sucks and no one should ever play it.

With the lottery, every si... [ More ]

Reply #73

Stack47 — Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:01:23 GMT

then I have a 1 in 10 chance of winning because I've purchased 1/10 of the possible outcomes. Now you're going to ask WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER 90 OUTCOMES??????!!!! Well, since there are 90 tickets that I didn't buy, I have a 90/100 = 90% chance of losing.

Yep a 1 in 10 chance of winning sure sounds better than 90% chance of losing, but they mean exactly the same. Just like a 1 in 300 chance sounds much better than a 99.67 chance of losing.

I previously said if there are 300 million possible... [ More ]

Reply #72

Mr-B 216 — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:16:39 GMT

Can anyone agree with the following...

If I purchase 1 ticket, then I have a 1 in 300,000,000 chance of owning a winning ticket, and the one line ticket has a 1 in 300,000,000 chance of being the winning ticket.

If I purchase 10 tickets with 10 unique and different lines, then I have a 1 in 30,000,000 chance of owning a winning ticket, and each one of the 10, one line tickets, still has the 1 in 300,000,000 chance of being a winning ticket.

If I purchase 300,000,000 tickets with 300,000... [ More ]

Reply #71

oate — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:07:40 GMT

Maybe you can use your grade school math to explain what happened to the 299 million other outcomes.

I'd be happy to help you with some grade school math. You can take the 299 million figure to compute the probability of not winning the jackpot when you buy 1 million tickets:

299,000,000/300,000,000 = 299/300 = 99.666667% chance of not winning the jackpot.

Again, what is the confusion? This is, as you say, grade school math.

Let's pretend Alaska started offering the lottery and... [ More ]

Reply #70

Stack47 — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:15:22 GMT

1,000,000/300,000,000 = 1/300 = 1 in 300

Congratulations; you can do 4th grade math! Maybe you can use your grade school math to explain what happened to the 299 million other outcomes.

But go ahead and pretend the odds shifted in your favor by ignoring the fact 1,000,000/300,000,000 = 0.333% chance of your $2 million worth of tickets winning the jackpot. Seriously, what moron would risk $2 million on a 1/3 of 1% chance of winning the jackpot

Reply #69

oate — Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:11:21 GMT

100/300,000,000 = 1/3,000,000 = 1 in 3,000,000

1,000,000/300,000,000 = 1/300 = 1 in 300

What's the confusion

Reply #68

Stack47 — Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:42:35 GMT

Off topic, why are most lottery odds expressed as TO 1 when lottery odds are actually FOR 1

Reply #67

Stack47 — Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:35:05 GMT

Are you saying each of the 10 lines has 30 million to 1 chance of winning the jackpot?

It's bad enough we have some people here that are probably counting on winning a MM or PB jackpot for their retirement without encouraging them into buying $200 worth of tickets will them a 3 million to 1 chance of winning the jackpot.

Reply #66

Stack47 — Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:28:04 GMT

Like I said before if you buy 10 tickets and it makes you feel better believing you increased your chances of winning by a factor of ten, good for you, but there are still 299,999,990 outcomes you don't have. I suppose next you'll say if you get 100 tickets your chance of winning the jackpot 3 million to 1 which is 6 times better than you odds of matching 5 numbers. And while you're at it, put together a syndicate and get 1 million tickets so you'll have a 1 in 300 chance of winning the jackpot.... [ More ]

Reply #65

Tucker Black — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:39:37 GMT

If you place a chip on 10 different roulette numbers all of them have a 1 in 38 chance of winning, but how many of them will win on one spin?

Combined you have 10 chances to win (but no more than 1 can win) and 28 chances to lose regardless how you express the odds.

Probability of winning plus probability of losing must equal 1 (since there are no other possible outcomes, it's either win or lose).

Reply #64

oate — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:33:20 GMT

Stack47, I honestly can't tell if you seriously believe that answer, or if you are too embarrassed to admit you made a mistake in an earlier post and are now doubling down on your bad math, or if you are a well-known LP joker just trolling us for laughs.

Best of luck to you.

Reply #63

Tucker Black — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:31:52 GMT

It's just arithmetic. 10 divided by 300 million is equal to 1 divided by 30 million. Those two fractions are unequivocally identical.

Yes, there are still 299,999,990 potential winning combinations you won't have. Thus, the probability of losing is 299,999,990 divided by 300 million, which is 29,999,999/30 million (divided top and bottom of the fraction by 10), which can be stated as 1 minus 1/30 million.

Reply #62

Soledad — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:42:03 GMT

I wish they would post the pick5 results in chronological order.

Reply #61

Stack47 — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:19:44 GMT

the probability of winning is 10/300,000,000 which is 1 in 30 million.

Are you planning on showing what happened to the other 270 million outcomes you erased to help get a positive R.O.I. long term?

If you place a chip on 10 different roulette numbers all of them have a 1 in 38 chance of winning, but how many of them will win on one spin?

Combined you have 10 chances to win (but no more than 1 can win) and 28 chances to lose regardless how you express the odds.

Reply #60

Stack47 — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:05:34 GMT

Are you planning on showing what happened to the other 270 million outcomes you erased to help us a positive R.O.I. long term