Can you enumerate in a list the things that don't work most of the time in lotteries?

Reply #23

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:05:42 GMT

Yeah, and there is prenumerando and postnumerando for annuities. It's easier to use Excel than those tables we forgot how to use. ... Rounding? wtf ...

Reply #22

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:50:36 GMT

OUT N F RF CF(0- o) CRF(0- o) E(F) E(RF) E(CF) E(CRF)

0 1,24,27,31,34,44 6 0.133 6 0.133 6.00 0.133 6.00 0.133

1 10,29,37,38 4 0.089 10 0.222 5.20 0.116 11.20 0.249

2 13,18,33,40 4 0.089 14 0.311 4.51 0.100 15.71 0.349

3 5,6,45 3 0.067 17 0.378 3.91 0.087 19.61 0.436

4 7,15,16 3 0.067 20 0.444 3.39 0.075 23.00 0.511

5 11,42 2 0.044 22 0.489 2.93 0.065 25.93 0.576

6 23,26 2 0.044 24 0.533 2.54 0.057 28.47 0.633

7 3,9,14,20 4 0.089 28 0.622 2.20 0.049 30.68

Reply #21

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:46:24 GMT

6/45*fx(1-6/45,8)

=0.68171457921658283798201493674744703551287913427831123304374333180917543057460752934003962810547172677623802186252095717116293247980490778844688309708885840573083371437280902301478433165675964029873493

Reply #20

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:34:34 GMT

Forgetting the function ...

x=2

=2

(x^0+x^1+x^2+x^3)

=15

(x^4-1)/(x-1)

=15

function(x,n){y=(x^n-1)/(x-1);return y

Reply #19

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:09:58 GMT

More or less 0.6817145792165828379820149367474470355128791342783112330437433318091754305746075293400396281054717269

Reply #18

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:49:27 GMT

p(drawn numbers from out 0 to 7) = 0.681715

Reply #17

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:06:44 GMT

Another remark was that it is more probable to have a number repeating.

That is skip or out or interval 0. I counted 17 drawings with repeating number(s).

So, 17 drawings with repeating numbers and 4 of them with 2 repeating numbers.

Reply #16

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:01:26 GMT

DATE WD N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 @1 @2 @3 @4 @5 @6

4/09/2021 6 2 7 22 25 28 33 0 4 2 5 2 0

8/09/2021 3 5 14 16 18 24 44 3 1 7 19 4 5

11/09/2021 6 4 13 28 29 32 34 18 3 1 10 9 21

15/09/2021 3 1 7 8 25 37 41 5 2 3 2 4 6

18/09/2021 6 5 8 16 18 25 44 2 0 2 2 0 2

Reply #15

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:57:14 GMT

So, he says that there should be at least one number out 8 or more games (average). See text.

Let me check:

Last 30 6/45 out before drawn

0:2 2:2 4:1 5:1

1:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 7:1 19:1

1:1 3:1 9:1 10:1 18:1 21:1

2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1

0:2 2:4

0:2 4:2 8:1 12:1

0:1 1:1 3:1 11:1 12:1 19:1

0:1 7:1 8:1 13:2 44:1

1:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 15:1 18:1

1:3 5:1 13:1 26:1

0:1 1:1 4:2 5:1 10:1

1:2 2:1 4:1 5:1 14:1

3:1 4:1 8:1 13:1 19:1 20:1

0:1 3:1 4:1

Reply #14

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:40:35 GMT

M xima is the wife of king Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands.

Maxima is an open source program for mathematics.

Maxima ... ...

Reply #13

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:35:04 GMT

There is a link to another page.

One of the points was that never any combination was drawn more than once in the entire game history.

Let me check with the 6/45 without the reserveball.

Minima: 397 420 131 11 0 0 0 (scores 0 to 6)

Maxima: 494 523 204 42 7 1 0 (scores 0 to 6)

So, no, that didn't happen and there are over 8 million combinations plus only just over 1000 drawings.

The maximum match was 1*5/6.

How many combinations would you eliminate? 1107, if you decided to a... [ More ]

Reply #12

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:20:38 GMT

I only used VBA in Excel. When someone asked, I had to tell them to try commercial software like for example SL. There is other software, somehow people often find SL. ...

Reply #11

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:15:22 GMT

You must read part 2. http://john-solitude.blogspot.com/2013/11/hoe-de-lotto-winnen-deel-2.html

I for my part, continued playing and changing my numbers arranged in my typed key wheels.

At some point I was tired of the payouts and the price. I picked it up again when they introduced the 1+R payback. (...) I stopped playing my 20 lines.

Reply #10

garyo1954 — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:10:52 GMT

Interesting. Assuming crosses are the same as hits in the States.

Couple of things stand out.......

This is an experiment with real bets by real players to compare whether a probability program manages to make the winnings higher than randomly choosing combinations.

Are they telling us that GH Advantage Gold is a probability program? (Guess that confirms its....uh......different......from prob-a-babbility)

I also liked the caution:

Using the Advantage Gold program t... [ More ]

Reply #9

Speler — Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:39:38 GMT

Here is a lotto experiment where they used SmartLuck GH.

http://john-solitude.blogspot.com/2013/03/taverne-lautrec-lotto-experiment.html

Reply #8

garyo1954 — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:13:24 GMT

Rereading that it needs some clarification. I used 1 since it give the largest range. I should have been more clear that using 1 is not going to allow 71.8% coverage in itself. So my bad.

To cover 71.8% you'd have to play every combination of 1 to 9 (37410) in a 4/35.

To cover every possible 1 you would play 5984 combinations (11.4%) .

Hopefully that clarifies those points.

In any case, these are the number of combinations that can be made.....(number on the left column... [ More ]

Reply #7

garyo1954 — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:00:32 GMT

The question is whether anything will work 80% of the time.

I'm saying wheels won't. Nothing wrong with the good and bad points, but we're talking real numbers, the percentage of coverage possible using 1 as a key digit.

Okay, if you use 1 as the key digit, which gives us the biggest range to play with, the largest coverage you can get is 71.8%. And that is only if we wheel every number with one, i.e, playing every possible combination.

The reason that's true is anytime we use... [ More ]

Reply #6

Speler — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 18:08:31 GMT

Key number(s) wrong? Less budget lost as less budget used.

Key number(s) correct? Less budget needed. Better payout ratio.

N: 1 to 7

Pick: 5

Combinations: 21 // full system

Combination: 1 2 3 4 5

3 10

4 10

5 1

Combinations: 15 // (full) key system with 1 as key

Combination: 1 2 3 4 5

3 6

4 8

5 1

Reply #5

garyo1954 — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:47:33 GMT

How about wheels?

Let's say we wheel using the largest range. So we use the number 1 in our wheel (but that doesn't mean it will always be the lowest number). In 1075X draws we have the possibility of hitting 1257 times. Roughly 11.7%.

Now let's say we use a key wheel with number 1 as the key. Our chart looks something like this......

1 0 1 2 3 11 12 13 22 23 22 111 112 113 122 123 133 222 223 244 333

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 4 2... [ More ]

Reply #4

dr san — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:09:55 GMT

of course you can create bets and then make the mirror, (see table) the hit is either in the base or in the mirror of the bets, or neither of the two ahhh

Reply #3

BobP — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:17:07 GMT

Filters less then 10% until you have enough of them to average at least one in every draw.

BobP

Reply #2

JeetKuneDoLotto — Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:31:57 GMT

What did you make for me?

A 100 hundred line wheel that nobody can play??

But as to your question,

1) Quick picks.

2) Quick picks.

3) Easy Picks.

4) Lazy Picks.

5)Quick, Eazy, and Lazy Picks.

Reply #1

garyo1954 — Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:37:55 GMT

This should be a poll where we vote on variables like

1) Sum

2) Even/Odd totals

3) Hi/Low totals

4) Prob-a-babilty math

G

Can you enumerate in a list the things that don't work most of the time in lotteries?

Speler — Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:04:24 GMT

I made it easy for you