<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>7 out of 9 states have $175,000 winners</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/60264</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/60264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: 7 out of 9 states have $175,000 winners</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/60264/72316</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/60264/72316</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is about time something that this happened. I find it funny though that Illinois and Michigan were the two states that didn&#x27;t have a $175,000 winner and these two states used to have the most winners in the old Big Game. I am from Michigan and I have noticed a dip in those prizes even though the odds from matching 5 in the old Big Game to matching 5 in Mega Millions have only changed a couple hundred thousand.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>7 out of 9 states have $175,000 winners</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/60264</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/60264</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 04:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mega Millions really  shared the wealth  this drawing. Pretty rare to have such an even split of $175,000 winners, especially given the variations in player pool sizes among the nine states.-Todd</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

