<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Suggestion for NEW ENGLAND</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/64609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Suggestion for NEW ENGLAND</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87338</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87338</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I bet you&#x27;re closer to RI. Their secondary game is a pick-5.  Hot Lotto  would be a good fit there, but I suppose RI wasn&#x27;t interested in it.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87336</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87336</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>CASH: You told me about it. But CT   NH are too far for me to travel to pick up those tickets. If I am there, I will certainly consider.</p>]]></description>
			<category>gary</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87282</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87282</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2002 02:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Gary: I presume you live in Mass. Did I tell you yet about  Hot Lotto  in NH and/or CT  Classic Lotto ? Both have better jackpot odds than the 6/49, and, of course, each has a cash option.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87273</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87273</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2002 01:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>CASH:I agree. May be I will throw in a note to our Treasurer if anyone cares to listen. I would definitely be interested in it if they make CASH option available.</p>]]></description>
			<category>gary</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87214</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87214</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:47:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Gary: Think about it. Expanding the 6/49 to all of New England would produce MORE jackpot winners. Also, the SW corner of New England is near NYC. Furthermore, offering a CASH OPTION would encourage more people to play. The amount of the annuity would still be advertised, but the PR campaign would say that a cash option WOULD be available.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87212</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609/87212</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you CASH. But the problem with 6/49 is there are so many few winners in a year. In a year only 2 to 3 jackpots are won. The sales are low for MASS 6/42 and 6/49. If they give CASH OPTION, the jackpot size will be much less huritng the sales pitch more.  I usually don&#x27;t play either of them for ANNUITY reasons.</p>]]></description>
			<category>gary</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Suggestion for NEW ENGLAND</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Many of you know that Massachusetts (in addition to MM) offers two in-state jackpot games, 6/42 and 6/49, both of which happen to be ANNUITY-ONLY. In the last couple of years, there has been a trend towards replacing single-state jackpot games with  second-tier  multi-state games ( Lotto South ,  Hot Lotto .) Other single-state games are hurting (eg  Michigan Millions  is being replaced next month.) Maybe the MASS 6/49 should be expanded to all six New England states (perhaps  Tri-State Megabuck... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64609">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

