<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>TTT from 564 in TX</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64657</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/64657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: TTT from 564 in TX</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64657/87422</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64657/87422</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 16:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>AmuzingP3s</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The winner was 859. I don&#x27;t see it on the TTT this time.</p>]]></description>
			<category>AmuzingP3s</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TTT from 564 in TX</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/64657</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 15:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>AmuzingP3s</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#x27;s see how Red&#x27;s TTT performs today in TX from last night&#x27;s winner--564.019564x73 The 671 and the 960 which I believe are still on the never-drawn numbers, have been coming out a lot in the workouts. There they are again. I don&#x27;t know.....maybe Oldham knows.</p>]]></description>
			<category>AmuzingP3s</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

