Lottery Systems Work Thomas Covenant

Reply #19

Andrew — Mon, 03 Feb 2003 19:15:29 GMT

Have you followed the online tutorial instructions? Also, what version did you download and install? There is a discussion forum for problems like this here: http://www.lotto649.ws/forums/forumdisplay.php?s= forumid=37This is where I keep all the program related bugs and such, it helps keep them in an easy to find place for me, and for the users. Also, you will find there these links to a help file for WINHunter. This help file is still being worked on and edited, but most of the meat regard... [ More ]

Reply #18

retxx — Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:23:51 GMT

to Andrew; I downloaded winhunter but find when I clicked on get prediction nothing happens. Is there something wrong there/ thanks

Reply #17

Sedertree — Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:17:38 GMT

Cash-O,Any random dvent will follow a normal bell curve over time. Statisticians actually use the existence of this curve to determine if a sample of data is indeed random.Dice is an exception only because of overall probability. There are more combinations of two die that equal 7.I believe you are taking the idea that lottery balls have a memory too literally. They do follow a distinct bell-shaped pattern. This is a proven fact.How do they know to follow this pattern? They are not sentie... [ More ]

Reply #16

CASH Only — Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:00:34 GMT

Lottery balls don't have a memory. Same with dice and roulette wheels.

Reply #15

Sage — Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:03:04 GMT

Thanks Andrew and well said. I will have to check out your site. Sage

Reply #14

Andrew — Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:02:18 GMT

Howdy Fine users of Lottery Post! It has been a long time since I have posted. My opinion goes without saying how I stand on this issue. I have been working on a new and different lottery software approach to predicting lottery numbers (did I say predict?) for many years now. Do I guarentee that it works, no way. But I can tell you that it can successfully eliminate 6-12 balls 50-75% of the time from a 6/XX lottery with the correctly optimized filter designs.WINHunter is not easy to learn,

Reply #13

CASH Only — Mon, 27 Jan 2003 01:09:25 GMT

Nobody beats the 'WIZ...as long as s/he chooses CASH

Reply #12

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:38:29 GMT

Well said I agree,because I never put down using QP's or said that systems were better, whatever works best for the player is what he should use,I just can't stand people who say RANDOM numbers can't be chosen using a system without really understanding the science behind it all.Yes picking the exact 3 numbers in the Cash3 not possible but picking a group of numbers too trap the winning cash3 numbers is possible.I use systems and software too select my numbers and enjoy doing so and do quite w... [ More ]

Reply #11

RJOh — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:30:01 GMT

Personally I prefer to use a system to pick my numbers because I not only play to win, but for entertainment and there is nothing entertaining to me about picking a lot of QPs and losing. When I lose using my system, I enjoy trying to adjust it in hope of picking better combinations the next time. The chance to win a large sum of money make playing the lottery more fun, but I know only a few of the millions of players will win, so I'm not planning my future hoping to win. I think if you enjoy... [ More ]

Reply #10

Sedertree — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:56:34 GMT

Thomas,I hear sooo many times that lottery balls do not have a memory .Random numbers ie; Lottery Balls do have a memory. It is called the Gaussian Bell Curve.http://www.dreamwater.net/biz/sedertree/gaussian.html....../George

Reply #9

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:50:08 GMT

Sage this guy says that it's impossible too predict the patterns there goes that word again PREDICT if I were trying too select a SINGLE pattern that is trying too predict but if I'm selecting a GROUP of patterns that's using strategy too TRAP that ever changing pattern.He's right that the patterns change from draw too draw that's why you select more of them and I'm not talking about the money aspect I'm talking about grabbing that winning combination using a SYSTEM not how much money I loss... [ More ]

Reply #8

Sage — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 09:40:34 GMT

You go Lottowiz!! I beleive that is StevePlayer.com You can call New hamshire to verify his winnings he won over $100,000 in one draw playing cash 4 straight and box bets using one of his systems the Money Map to be exact so there is proof! I know systems work because I use them everyday! Most of the time I like Lottowiz will trap the number. It's just i want to narrow down the numbers to about 10 really good numbers based on number activity, what's over due ect. I can post 150 numbers... [ More ]

Reply #7

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 09:18:34 GMT

The patterns change after every draw. It is just as impossible to predict the pattern as it is to predict the next winning number. Bad thing about wheeling systems is it costs a lot of money to play it correctly. You do win more, because of the simple fact you buy more tickets, but you lose more also. How can you say lottery systems work if you have lost money? Are you saying that lottery systems work because you haven't lost as much money as you would have playing quick picks? I saw Steve Playe... [ More ]

Reply #6

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 06:59:04 GMT

I don't need too prove anything too you my friend,if that's the way you see it then that's fine by me I pick numbers for me not for every state in the USA besides that's a job for a Lottery Expert I'm a Lottery Player I just do numbers for FL all states have different number activity but you wouldn't understand that or the difference between someone who studies numbers for all state games or just the state they live in.I just laugh at people like you and as for how much I lost I never said I mad... [ More ]

Reply #5

visiondude — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:24 GMT

thomas,so many great thi

Reply #4

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:26:03 GMT

i would like to see someone pick numbers based on the algorithym/oscillating/rotational spin moves that michael jackson is doing in the above post by thomas. there are some mathematical minds in here that could break down michael's moves into some sort of pattern. Ok, V-dude, I see a 424,456,737,458,532,234,562,223,993,251,129,657,608,200,883,345,776,658,219,323,336,258,212,999,664,625,325,666. Now this is for every state, both the mid and the eve drawing, for the next 4 years, not counting al... [ More ]

Reply #3

visiondude — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:16:16 GMT

i would like to see someo

Reply #2

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:31:00 GMT

How much have you lost playing Pick 3? You can't just say I won this and this and this without counting how much you spent. You say you have proof, so show me. Pick 10 sets of Pick 3 numbers for all the states that has Pick 3. Play for 1000 draws. Then we will add up all the money you won and substract it from all the money you spent. You will be in the red. You can find a pattern in just about any thing you look at. Do a pick 3 draw for about a million times and all the numbers will balance o... [ More ]

Reply #1

CASH Only — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:42:53 GMT

Has LottoWorld Magazine officially gone out of business? (I delivered NY's Lottery New$ from April 1993 until its demise in December 2001.

Lottery Systems Work Thomas Covenant

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:36:21 GMT

Well then you won't mind if I express the truth,and the truth is they do work and I have proof.First of all let me point out that I was a skeptic just like you until I stumbled upon LottoWorld Magazine in 1996 which introduced me too the science of number system play.And afterwards I quit using quick-picks and started developing my own and using other systems and later on Lottery Software.Now let me explain before you start tearing down my statements I'm not saying systems are better than quick... [ More ]