<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Quick-Picks versus Systems</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/66355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Quick-Picks versus Systems</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/99363</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/99363</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#x27;t care for systems-not even when I delivered  Lottery New$  magazine. It folded in December 2001.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/94815</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/94815</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gogo13</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>personally i like the idea of the leprechaun scenerio</p>]]></description>
			<category>gogo13</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/94786</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/94786</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Thomas Covenant</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have always said that any set of numbers has just as much chance of getting drawn as any other set of numbers. It doesn&#x27;t matter where you get them from. Quick picks, lottery systems, birthdays, the number of hairs on certain sections of my head(which would be a set of very low numbers) What I am saying is lottery systems do not increase your odds of winning. If I posted that I found $77,000 in my 15 year old son&#x27;s closet, and he made it by spamming, AND YOU COULD TOO!!, wouldn&#x27;t you question... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355/94786">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Thomas Covenant</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Quick-Picks versus Systems</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lottowiz34</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve read many post in the past where players debated on which is better buying quick-picks or using systems.There&#x27;s even been challenges between QP users and system user&#x27;s too see which worked better all in an effort to put down and discredit systems.This is totally ridiculous because whether you realise it or not a Quick-Pick is a form of system.A system as far as lottery playing is concerned is a method or technique used to generate or select lottery number combinations.Isn&#x27;t that what QP&#x27;s d... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/66355">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lottowiz34</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

