<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Doubles....the value?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/69067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Doubles....the value?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108172</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108172</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 20:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.......Ga doesn&#x27;t have front back pair ..anything. Think I&#x27;ll switch. Man ......we are getting the raw odds</p>]]></description>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108136</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108136</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 18:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>cplus</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I know Bluegrass plays that way. It does make more sense to me to play that way. Since it pays 400-1, I like those odds.I tried for a month or two playing only doubles last year and had my first hit ever!!!! It me me feel great, but then I switched over to concentrate on the pick-3. I have learned so much now about these games that I might switch back next month to see what I can do. Can&#x27;t be much worse.</p>]]></description>
			<category>cplus</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108120</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067/108120</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 16:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dolllie</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No I don&#x27;t use that system, but (to me) hitting 4 numbers is easier than hitting three numbers.Try playing front pair or back pair, if offered in your state.  It is real easy to get a hit on just 2 of the numbers by tracking them.Good Luck</p>]]></description>
			<category>dolllie</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doubles....the value?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/69067</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2003 20:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In pick 4 the doubles hit 50% of the time......so I ask ...why not play the doubles only. They are easy to track ..better than singles. Tracking the position would be easier.....and tracking the fourth number would be easier. I like having 50 % of the numbers automatically ....I like knowing on those days I will never have less than half the numbers. Just seems like the best way to play. Anyone out their play this system? The tracking  is the key. It&#x27;s just easier with the doubles.Win  d</p>]]></description>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

