New Lotto Cheatah awesome win performance

Reply #80

askjeeves — Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:28:36 GMT

L34:How old are you in real life? Not your mental age which I think is 4. Maybe I'm not old enough to drink but at least I understand the concepts that's being discussed. You, you're just another nut case.

Reply #79

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:00:40 GMT

Okay you asked for it Little Boy it's quite obvious when your RETARDED your BRAIN can't function properly it's okay though I understand what happened too you when you were a CHILD.

Reply #78

askjeeves — Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:21:57 GMT

L34:Admit it. You were wrong. Yes, you acted like a child. You don't have to heed my advice if you don't want to. Sometimes, you can't teach a 6 yr. old child to listen no matter how or what you try to do. Case over Mr. Voodoo Man.

Reply #77

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:14:55 GMT

Maybe it would help if you really understood that you didn't know what you were talking about and that it didn't really make any sense when you consider the fact that I wasn't even referring to you I was responding to VisionDude and you put your nose in where it didn't belong.I never asked for your advice I just stated that I didn't feel LottoCheatah was ripping anyone off or trying to purposely mislead people.That's my opinion concerning the matter your just MAD because I didn't agree with you,... [ More ]

Reply #76

askjeeves — Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:03:42 GMT

Lotto34:Talk some sense and mabye people will respond better. I didn't reply to insult you but I replied to correct you. It's good to correct someone esp. when they have no idea what they're talking about.

Reply #75

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:55:28 GMT

I only responded to your comment because you made it sound like I was just RANTING for no reason whether you like how I responded to there remarks is your businessand it does matter who started it because it shows that they just WANTED too start some trouble with me which I never have and never will but if someone starts something for no reason I will finish it.And finally you will notice that I censored all my harsh language out of respect to others so it's possible that's why Todd didn't CANCE... [ More ]

Reply #74

Rebeckah — Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:29:03 GMT

Clarence is responding to a post I made, then later deleted. Anybody who gets posts in their email will see my post, anybody who reads at the site {like me} won't see my post.....Basically, Clarence is refering to the comment I made that this thread has been rather polite especially in comparison to Clarence's cussing on another thread. Clarence, I didn't read all of that thread. Why should I ???? It's offensive, not informative. I try ignore name calling, cussing and bashing because it serv... [ More ]

Reply #73

visiondude — Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:00:05 GMT

lottowiz,even though i don't believe in systems , i still have an open mind about it. having said that i don't have a problem with ANYONE that sells a system as long as they are honest in their marketing of it. if they can give the player what they promise for the money they so willingly take, then i have nothing to say.if someone lies, mis-represents or makes claims that they cannot back up, then i will usually say something. VDQPLS

Reply #72

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:36:23 GMT

VisionDude glad your looking out for the Underdog,I've been around for awhile and know quite a bit about Lottery Software and for the past 6 yrs have never bought a program I didn't like.As long as it performs the functions I'm looking for it's okay in my book.Otherplayers shouldn't expect Lottery Software to do more than it was designed for,I learned that lesson the hard way and afterwards realised there only TOOLS to help make System Players job easier.

Reply #71

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:28:39 GMT

Well Rebeckah if you read all the messages between me AskJeeves and Orangeman you would have seen that AskJeeves started the whole thing.I was just responding to VisionDude's post about LottoCheatah and those 2 started raging on me.I don't bother anybody in here and never insulted or attacked anyone for no reason but I'm not going to sit back and let someone make wisecracks at me when I wasn't even referring to them.Calling me Illiterate,a Ditz and a child is not the way you make apoint with som... [ More ]

Reply #70

lottocheatah — Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:53:07 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottocheatah on June 01, 2003 The worlds most powerful lotto picker just got better with the release of Lotto Cheatah version 1.23. Six jackpots nailed so far this year, (maybe 7 by the time you read this.. it's due) and thousands of second prize hits.screenshot then download your own Lotto Cheatah (free download, no registration req) from the official Lotto Cheatah website (see below).Lotto Cheatah Jackpot Winning Lottery SoftwareCovers Powerball, Mega Millions, UK L... [ More ]

Reply #69

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:58:57 GMT

Your right this seems too go on a lot in here I'm glad I don't sell any software or systems if I did I certainly wouldn't mention it here.

Reply #68

emilyg — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:02:16 GMT

to all - this topic has been milked to death. what's next? or rather who's going to be torn apart next

Reply #67

visiondude — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:21:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on June 25, 2003Thanks for your concern VisionDude but I think your advice or opinion is best suited for those who are unfamiliar or inexperienced with purchasing or using Lottery Softwarethats exactly who i gear my comments to. the ones who have been around a while know better (or should). i fill in the blanks for those that are unable to. after that, it's their money , not mine (lol - sigh).VDQPLS

Reply #66

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:05:44 GMT

Don't get mad Jana2002 we are just voicing our opinionand it's only Bad if we feel that it is.Thanks for your concern VisionDude but I think your advice or opinion is best suited for those who are unfamiliar or inexperienced with purchasing or using Lottery Softwareas for those of us who are we'll keep on buying and reading other players complaints.Anyway GOOD LUCK too all no matter how you play the game as long as it helps you win.

Reply #65

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:28:31 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #64

visiondude — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:06:28 GMT

thanks jana.make s

Reply #63

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:55:25 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #62

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:53:00 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #61

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:49:49 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #60

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:47:38 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #59

visiondude — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:26:39 GMT

fill in the blanks part 3.i have ALWAYS stated that it is good that cheetah offer a free trial. i have commemnded him for that. i have also stated that i am glad that he is NOT as greedy as others are that charge $$$$ for the use of thier systems .i must however explain two points in order to clarify.(1) cheetah and i go back a ways. he knew that i have spoken out against people who sell systems that cannot produce in the past. the if you are going to make claims and charge people $$$ for it,

Reply #58

RJOh — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:40:12 GMT

The point I was making is that I think LottoCheatah could not be fairer than allowing a free down load and trial period. I agree with you that $12.50 not a big investment for anyone who would like to try the software longer. I purchased the file update for LottoPro every year because I like that feature. I've read some post of people here complaining about the numbers posted here. There will alway be those people you will think that they were cheated if they spent a little time or a little m... [ More ]

Reply #57

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:23:02 GMT

I have a friend that bought Steve Players Money-Map system for $395 and there are other players that have posted in here that bought his systems for $80 and up.I have many of Steve's systems and most are very expensive but I feel they are worth the price of admission so spending $12.50 on LottoCheatah is like getting a free ticket.

Reply #56

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:15:55 GMT

I'm sorry but I have too disagree with you Jana2002 I have LottoCheatah and it only cost me $12.50 even if it didn't work (which it does by producing 3,4 and 5 hits every now and then)everyone in here easily spends more than $12.50 on the Lottery games whether it's quick-picks or there own numbers.I have some software that cost me anywhere from $20-$60 the rest I got for freeI really don't understand why everyone is trashing his program when you have some players or system developersselling pape... [ More ]

Reply #55

RJOh — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:07:22 GMT

It should be noted that LottoCheatah download is free and it has 8 free updates. I down loaded it and tried it for the eight updates, I didn't buy any updates so I don't feel he cheated me. Many good software developers offer a free down load and trial period. I tried LottoPro and liked it, so I bought it, but I would have never bought it, it I had not liked it after using it for the free trial. Just because you can down load and try it, doesn't mean you have to buy it. If you buy somethi... [ More ]

Reply #54

Todd — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:53:08 GMT

jana,I agree that

Reply #53

jana2002 — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:22:05 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Andrew on June 25, 2003 LottoCheatah,From one developer to another, the proof was in the pudding. You had your chance at showing a win in the playoff, just as the rest of us predictors have a chance each and every day.Most players cannot afford the massive amount of lines that your software requires in order to guarentee a win from your overly abused Hit Parade . According to Gail Howard, I should be able to predict half of the numbers played, and still maintain th... [ More ]

Reply #52

Andrew — Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:37:03 GMT

LottoCheatah,From one developer to another, the proof was in the pudding. You had your chance at showing a win in the playoff, just as the rest of us predictors have a chance each and every day.Most players cannot afford the massive amount of lines that your software requires in order to guarentee a win from your overly abused Hit Parade . According to Gail Howard, I should be able to predict half of the numbers played, and still maintain the jackpot in those numbers. Do I need to start post... [ More ]

Reply #51

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:58:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on June 24, 2003 Quote: Originally posted by lottocheatah on June 24, 2003 Money?? Who mentioned money other than you? We didn't play for money. We played buy a scoring system using the odds. This is the only way you can play different games and keep a level playing field. Money had nothing to do with it.If you want to look at it from the point of theoretical money, then I probably would have taken the cup. You see, nobody came out [theoretically] ahead. Yo... [ More ]

Reply #50

visiondude — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:38:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottocheatah on June 24, 2003Money?? Who mentioned money other than you? We didn't play for money. We played buy a scoring system using the odds. This is the only way you can play different games and keep a level playing field. Money had nothing to do with it.If you want to look at it from the point of theoretical money, then I probably would have taken the cup. You see, nobody came out [theoretically] ahead. You would have to hit the jackpot or at least two 5/6 to do... [ More ]

Reply #49

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:55:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on June 24, 2003 cheetah,your subtle half truth that was misleading WAS that you finished first (for the canadian group). you forgot to mention where you finished overall and the fact that after 100 draws a day for 35 days ($3,500), you didn't even make your money back. you deliberately implied that you finished first. m i s l e a d i n gIt is only misleading to your confused state of mind. The point being made was that the current version of Lotto... [ More ]

Reply #48

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:23:06 GMT

I have your program Ron and don't see what all the fuss is about it's only $12.50 and if players feel your taking others for a ride then they shouldn't buy it or just ignore your program altogether.

Reply #47

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:52:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on June 20, 2003 Well here's what I got from the whole thing,LottoCheatahcan HIT 3,4 or 5 numbers but not as often as a player would like and you could lose more than you spent trying too do so.So my advice is too play strategicallyby using 5 different depth settings 10 combinations for each every month which is $50 each game.I have the program myself and in my opinion it's okay but I think it's quite capable of doing a lot more.Ron has added many feature... [ More ]

Reply #46

JAZZY JASPER — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:50:23 GMT

Hmmn

Reply #45

visiondude — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:36:27 GMT

cheetah,your subtle half truth that was misleading WAS that you finished first (for the canadian group). you forgot to mention where you finished overall and the fact that after 100 draws a day for 35 days ($3,500), you didn't even make your money back. you deliberately implied that you finished first. m i s l e a d i n g people can do whatever they want with their money and i won't have anything to say about it UNTIL someone either outright lies or they pull the half truth game. then i... [ More ]

Reply #44

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:20:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by jana2002 on June 24, 2003 Sorry that is the key number please email me the key number again thank u , u have the email address. All key orders are filled within minutes of the order being accepted, and I answer every Lotto Cheatah enquiry personally, almost always the same day.If you have placed a key order and have not received a key then you should immediately contact www.regsoft.com with your order number. These good people handle my key sales. They are a very goo... [ More ]

Reply #43

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:14:24 GMT

Again, sorry for the late reply to all the posts that accumulated since my last visit. This is one of my regular virtual stops, but I only seem to find time to get in here a few times a month. Busy, busy..To clarify a point on the last year's World Cup. All I have previous posted on this matter [or any other, for that matter] is the absolute truth. I can't help it if people do not understand what they read, or wish to interpret what I wrote other than the way it is written.As I recall, I stated... [ More ]

Reply #42

jana2002 — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:13:35 GMT

Sorry that is the key number please email me the key number again thank u , u have the email address.

Reply #41

jana2002 — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:08:19 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottocheatah on June 24, 2003 Quote: Originally posted by Rebeckah on June 22, 2003Anybody who reads RGL newsgroup frequently sees Cheeta posting the subsequent bashing of his sw by the regular members, who were also the people he was up against in that competition. Seems to me he's trying to get newbies to buy, but the lotto old timers know what a joke it is. It's basically a RNG {random number generator} if you're going to play picks of RNG, you might as well pl... [ More ]

Reply #40

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:42:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rebeckah on June 22, 2003 Anybody who reads RGL newsgroup frequently sees Cheeta posting the subsequent bashing of his sw by the regular members, who were also the people he was up against in that competition. Seems to me he's trying to get newbies to buy, but the lotto old timers know what a joke it is. It's basically a RNG {random number generator} if you're going to play picks of RNG, you might as well play a quick pick. If you're going to spend $15-20 a game,... [ More ]

Reply #39

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:32:30 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by askjeeves on June 21, 2003 LottoWhateverI ain't calling you lottowiz since you certainly ain't a wiz. If you can't clearly see the point VD made and why Chettah wasn't telling the whole truth, I have a Brooklyn bridge I can sell you for only $10 bucks. Maybe you should start collecting bridges as your hobbies. Let me try to explain the whole situation to you as if you're a 6 yr old kid:LottoCheetah was Bad . He lied. Bad Bad Bad.You can't fully trust his progra... [ More ]

Reply #38

lottocheatah — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:24:34 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #37

Rebeckah — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:03:43 GMT

Anybody who reads RGL newsgroup frequently sees Cheeta posting the subsequent bashing of his sw by the regular members, who were also the people he was up against in that competition. Seems to me he's trying to get newbies to buy, but the lotto old timers know what a joke it is. It's basically a RNG {random number generator} if you're going to play picks of RNG, you might as well play a quick pick. If you're going to spend $15-20 a game, you should be educating yourself on number selection t... [ More ]

Reply #36

visiondude — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:38:35 GMT

by the big V on

Reply #35

emilyg — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:25:32 GMT

vision dude - and how will i know it's you

Reply #34

visiondude — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:22:01 GMT

win D,i always suspected that you were in fact the IRAQI foreign spin minister.read ALL of this thread and the one that todd posted as a link (5 pages) and then if you have any questions, fire away.........VDQPLS

Reply #33

WIN D — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:04:55 GMT

VisiondudeBaby, People, ....what is all the fuss about? Here..........I am raising two hands

Reply #32

orangeman — Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:47:11 GMT

From the looks of the discussion string, the Cheateh is the author of the software . . .Orangeman

Reply #31

visiondude — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:45:46 GMT

thomas,i have violated #1 but i have never violated #2 when i was in sales.(lol).......................................................emily, you are funny. still looking to spot you in your camry. saw one that had an american flag but no fish and by the time i caught up with it, it was a man baby (lol).......VDQPLS

Reply #30

Thomas Covenant — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:20:37 GMT

Quote

Reply #29

emilyg — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:42:13 GMT

all who have never lied - rais

Reply #28

visiondude — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:08:48 GMT

financial tip of the day,

Reply #27

askjeeves — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:23:53 GMT

LottoWhateverI ain't calling you lottowiz since you certainly ain't a wiz. If you can't clearly see the point VD made and why Chettah wasn't telling the whole truth, I have a Brooklyn bridge I can sell you for only $10 bucks. Maybe you should start collecting bridges as your hobbies. Let me try to explain the whole situation to you as if you're a 6 yr old kid:LottoCheetah was Bad . He lied. Bad Bad Bad.You can't fully trust his programs.

Reply #26

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 04:00:32 GMT

Besides if you don't like his program don't buy it I collect programs as a Hobby as well as use them for selecting numbers for $12.50 it's well worth the price of admission.

Reply #25

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 03:58:08 GMT

I wasn't asking for any help my friend

Reply #24

JAZZY JASPER — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:37:05 GMT

Hmmn

Reply #23

visiondude — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:30:33 GMT

lottowiz,if thats what you got after reading those 5 pages and my first statement, i certainly can't help you. (sigh)VISION(i can see ) dudeqpls

Reply #22

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:49:17 GMT

Well here's what I got from the whole thing,LottoCheatahcan HIT 3,4 or 5 numbers but not as often as a player would like and you could lose more than you spent trying too do so.So my advice is too play strategicallyby using 5 different depth settings 10 combinations for each every month which is $50 each game.I have the program myself and in my opinion it's okay but I think it's quite capable of doing a lot more.Ron has added many features which I think are good but I would like itif a player... [ More ]

Reply #21

Todd — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:45:34 GMT

Boy, that was entertaining thread to read through. I really missed the boat on that one when it was first building. Here's the short version of the URL:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/63536

Highly recommended

Reply #20

emilyg — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:58:41 GMT

thank you.

Reply #19

hypersoniq — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:56:15 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/threads.asp?ForumID=5 TopicID=63536 SearchPagePosition=1 search=lottocheatah searchMode=allwords searchIn=TopicThread forum=0 searchSort=views ReturnPage=Search ThreadPage=1 there's a link...

Reply #18

emilyg — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:54:23 GMT

how about a link? please.

Reply #17

visiondude — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:36:52 GMT

to all,

i gave lotto cheetah a chance to respond but he hasn't.

so here it is. read it for yourself and decide for yourself if he was being truthful in his claim...

..........................................................

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/63536?q=lottocheatah

VDQPLS

Reply #16

JAZZY JASPER — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:34:06 GMT

Visiondude, I remember!A. Jeeves- I'm playing for real, the 'Lottery', won't accept, my, 'MONOPOLY- Money

Reply #15

askjeeves — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:20:49 GMT

Can't wait to know what Cheetah did.

Reply #14

visiondude — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:14:48 GMT

todd,you know that

Reply #13

Todd — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:18:50 GMT

OK VisionDude, it's been

Reply #12

visiondude — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:30:18 GMT

i am not advising anybody anything to do with lotto cheetah. you will have to make up your own mind how you spend your money.i will wait to see if he tells the WHOLE truth about the challenge that he participated in, not just a half truth.it was worded to make it purposefully sound like he accomplished something he didn't.if he doesn't......i will. but i will give him a chance to come clean on his own first. VDQPLS

Reply #11

urug2000 — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:50:19 GMT

Me too, I think! Don't think I should undelete or reinstall at this time.

Reply #10

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:54:58 GMT

Hey VISIONDUDE!! I want too know the truth I have a working version of LottoCheatah I would like too know what really happened.

Reply #9

visiondude — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:13:24 GMT

Quote

Reply #8

lottocheatah — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:45:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by urug2000 on June 06, 2003 For what its worth, I delected LOTTOCHEATAH from my computer several months ago, even with some 98 credits left on it.I could not make that sucker work and could not get downloads consistently. Lotto Cheatah has never missed a game or failed to post its draw results for downloads [normally within 1 hour of the draw]. If you could not get it to update then there must have been some other problem.. somewhere.Note that Lotto Cheatah is a Win9x a... [ More ]

Reply #7

lottocheatah — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:31:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ECRI on June 01, 2003 I have played the lottery for a very long time in many states and my experience was to get an accurate percentage of the number of times that number has played. For example, your 1.23 version establishes the number of times numbers 1-52 have appeared. However,it is highly unlikely that what you have statistically would be anything but accurate because you did not take into account the number of games played prior to May 17, 2002, commonly known a... [ More ]

Reply #6

lottocheatah — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:15:53 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on June 01, 2003 How many lines did you have to play per drawings to get those kinds of results? I remembered sometime back you posted 260 lines for a Powerball drawing and your hits amounted to less than $10 while the same amount of lines generated by a RNG hitted for about $45. Don't intend to rain on your parade, but the average player can't afford to play 1-2% of the possible combinations each draw.RJOhSorry for the late response. I don't get in here all tha... [ More ]

Reply #5

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:06:50 GMT

uruq2000 the way too play and possibly HIT using Lotto Cheatah is too use anywhere from 5 to 10 different Depth Settings playing 10 combinations with each one.If you notice the Hits it has on the Hit Parade page it's with more than 1 Depth setting if the Auto Depth setting gives you the best oneyou should also choose more along with it.That way you increase your chances of getting some kind of hit maybe3,4 or even 5 numbers.

Reply #4

urug2000 — Fri, 06 Jun 2003 20:22:48 GMT

For what its worth, I delected LOTTOCHEATAH from my computer several months ago, even with some 98 credits left on it.I could not make that sucker work and could not get downloads consistently.

Reply #3

ECRI — Sun, 01 Jun 2003 22:37:46 GMT

I have played the lottery for a very long time in many states and my experience was to get an accurate percentage of the number of times that number has played. For example, your 1.23 version establishes the number of times numbers 1-52 have appeared. However,it is highly unlikely that what you have statistically would be anything but accurate because you did not take into account the number of games played prior to May 17, 2002, commonly known as the Big Game. Note! nothing has changed. Inaddit... [ More ]

Reply #2

cotti47 — Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:51:49 GMT

LottochetahSounds really Great!Please post your picks for Mega Millions, Power Ball, so we can see for ourselves.Hope to see'em, plenty of time left to post'em.

Reply #1

RJOh — Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:23:03 GMT

How many lines did you have to play per drawings to get those kinds of results? I remembered sometime back you posted 260 lines for a Powerball drawing and your hits amounted to less than $10 while the same amount of lines generated by a RNG hitted for about $45. Don't intend to rain on your parade, but the average player can't afford to play 1-2% of the possible combinations each draw.RJOh

New Lotto Cheatah awesome win performance

lottocheatah — Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:00:56 GMT

The worlds most powerful lotto picker just got better with the release of Lotto Cheatah version 1.23. Six jackpots nailed so far this year, (maybe 7 by the time you read this.. it's due) and thousands of second prize hits.Check out these stats:Currently picking 15% money-winners (at default settings over last 10 games) on Lotto South 6/49, 11% winners on California SuperLotto Plus, 9% winners on Texas Two Step. Lotto Cheatah is virtually hammering every game on the menu!screenshot then download... [ More ]