Bigger jackpot or better odds?

Reply #21

fja — Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:37:56 GMT

Depends on the odds...1:25,000,000 are better odds but still a strech away...i'd rather have bigger jackpots.....

Reply #20

CASH Only — Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:27:21 GMT

Given the jackpot is out of reach , the odds (of winning a good lower-tier prize) has some weight.

Reply #19

visiondude — Mon, 07 Jul 2003 18:51:01 GMT

cash,i would like

Reply #18

CASH Only — Mon, 07 Jul 2003 06:42:07 GMT

V-dude:Just behind Todd with # of posts...

Reply #17

visiondude — Sun, 06 Jul 2003 00:15:46 GMT

billy,maybe with h

Reply #16

billy-loco — Sat, 05 Jul 2003 23:59:44 GMT

...golotto; Are u related to Visiondude? What u wrote is straight outta VD's line of thinking...LOL!! b i l l y l o c o

Reply #15

kbcherokee — Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:26:09 GMT

Hey gang...

Reply #14

CASH Only — Sat, 05 Jul 2003 15:10:33 GMT

Bigger jackpot? Better odds?Less filling? Tastes great

Reply #13

Calscorp — Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:29:04 GMT

GolottoThat was really something. And they did it on my birthday. Hmmmm. Should have been me!!!! lol

Reply #12

CASH Only — Fri, 04 Jul 2003 10:13:59 GMT

When there's a $200 million jackpot, it's probably the prize.

Reply #11

CASH Only — Tue, 24 Jun 2003 01:53:42 GMT

Who's gonna break the tie

Reply #10

CASH Only — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 05:51:06 GMT

I guess it depends most on the JACKPOT.

Reply #9

CASH Only — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 03:09:46 GMT

There are other decision-makers, like the prize return (one game still pays only 40

Reply #8

golotto — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:10:49 GMT

Reply #7

player nc — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:57:59 GMT

odds of winning jackpot are 1 in 135,145,920

Reply #6

player nc — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:56:10 GMT

just give me the 2nd prize (175,000) i'll take that wouldn't you

Reply #5

urug2000 — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:44:47 GMT

OK, now I know that I am 'fused'.So, who added the 'con' which, in turn, 'con-fused' me enough to think that I will win both the M.M jackpot tonight AND and the P.B jackpot tomorrow night

Reply #4

golotto — Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:58:45 GMT

...around 384.2 milli

Reply #3

Loops — Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:23:54 GMT

bigger jackpots

Reply #2

Greg — Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:53:41 GMT

I don't want a bigger jackpot, especially at the expense of the odds becoming worse than they are now!I can be content with $20,000,000 just as much as I could with $2,000,000. The jackpot bandwagon may see only dollar signs but I believe losing track of the odds is foolish. Increasing the jackpot does not help players' advantage, strategy, or skill. Instead, it taxes and depletes them, rendering them almost ineffective.I liked the Big Game back when the final number had a smaller number fie... [ More ]

Reply #1

Rebeckah — Sat, 14 Jun 2003 13:35:57 GMT

I want it all! good odds and a good jackpot.

Bigger jackpot or better odds?

visiondude — Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:34:28 GMT

size matters