Lotto synchronizer big test

Reply #197

lottoshlep — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 17:15:51 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #196

WILLSELL — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:23:29 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #195

Guru — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:20:08 GMT

LottoSynchronizer was

Reply #194

lottoshlep — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:15:03 GMT

Oh yes ... Bush beer from Belg

Reply #193

Guru — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:04:47 GMT

And have you already tasted

Reply #192

lottoshlep — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:59:46 GMT

Hehe ... seems like a lot o

Reply #191

Guru — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:27:07 GMT

Indeed it was. hmmm tasty

Reply #190

Todd — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:14:27 GMT

...And it was a Belgian who

Reply #189

visiondude — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:13:35 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #188

Timmer692002 — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:32:09 GMT

Quote

Reply #187

Guru — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 05:46:34 GMT

Do you know it was a B

Reply #186

WILLSELL — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:45:12 GMT

LOLI just figured it out Todd is posturing for a job with microsoft or sponsorship.The internet was around long before MS got into the picture.Most web servers are still Unix based. Fact, Check with any large ISP and you will find that the infrastructure is Unix based. MS is a new player in the internet arena. But I thought you knew that Todd.The java script battle still rages on. MS tried to put the cabash on that but industry fought back.

Reply #185

Todd — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:06:28 GMT

wilsel - still dodging the issue.hypersoniq - still dodging the issue.Littleoldlady - I agree, I thought I was at Lottery Post, at least I tried to throw in a lottery analogy in my last response! I just get my back up when people trash one of the companies that help produce some of the best things about the Internet today. It is because of Microsoft that we're able to do things like Lottery Post. While I have clarity of that fact, others are not so fortunate. Hopefully we're finished with th... [ More ]

Reply #184

WILLSELL — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:40:03 GMT

Todd,Setup a poll and let's here what the readers have to say or do you consider the consumers as wannabe's .

Reply #183

Littleoldlady — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:41:29 GMT

Gee, I thought I was at the Lo

Reply #182

hypersoniq — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:55:52 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #181

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:15:29 GMT

Wilsel,Again, you're missing the point. I do not care if you have differing views on something. It is your nature of viciously bashing a company even though you don't appear to be in a knowledgeable position to form a logical argument. That is what I define as a wanna-be.And yes, I question the IT experience of anyone who bashes something or someone without backing it up with facts. It's like someone bashing a lottery system here as being stupid without saying why. I have no problem with t... [ More ]

Reply #180

WILLSELL — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 21:33:18 GMT

Todd,This is going nowhere. You took exception to my views on Microsoft which has nothing to do with my IT experience. The problem was your trying to validate your opinion by questioning the IT experience of those that have differing views.I will not continue this dialog because it does not change my opinion.BTW I have 30 years plus in all facets of IT. There is not an area of IT that I have not been involved in. Wait I lied .... I have not spent a lot of time with security and SANS. Only becaus... [ More ]

Reply #179

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:54:58 GMT

hypersoniq,Sounds like you have a lot of gripes about the workplace. I haven't really heard anything from you which indicates that you're in good position to pass judgment on Microsoft.

Reply #178

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:53:21 GMT

willsell,You are wrong in trying to size up who I am or what roles I play. I am also not on a sensitive trip - I think you are though. I never brought up what you thought about my experience - I specifically made mention of YOUR lack of experience.It was a good try on your part to try and turn things around, but it didn't work.You didn't debate any of the points in question, but instead tried to take pot shots at me.Unless you can tell me about your experience in the IT world, I'm sorry, b... [ More ]

Reply #177

hypersoniq — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:05:27 GMT

All of my tools for lottery work are MS based also... MS office XP (Excel Access) and Visual Studio (6 and .NET).

Reply #176

WILLSELL — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:47:48 GMT

Hyper,I admire your efforts to do so much with so little and no budget.If I had to hire someone today, it would be someone with your backround because you have had to learn the nitty gritty details the hard way and that is what experience is all about.You are on the right track with terminal server but you don't have the horsepower to run it.We use two boxes to support local and remote users.The file server is the workhorse with 2 gig memory raid drives and tons of disk space. The other box is o... [ More ]

Reply #175

WILLSELL — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:31:22 GMT

Whew , At least you admit t

Reply #174

hypersoniq — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:25:43 GMT

I don't use 100

Reply #173

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:34:39 GMT

hypersoniq WILLSELL,Well you guys are definitely from the other side of the spectrum. (A bit of brainwashing here?)I think I said I use 100% Microsoft products, why are you questioning what other software I use? Was I not clear enough? (Perhaps you're accustomed to using a patchwork of buggy UNIX varieties all strung together with a zillion patches and bug fixes.)Microsoft is wonderful because they provide their patches and bugs fixes in a way that is very easy to administer - unlike UNIX/L... [ More ]

Reply #172

hypersoniq — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:08:49 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by WILLSELL on October 25, 2003 how many additional product or tools did you have to employ to make you web secure?A Linux Firewall... Not that MS doesn't have ISA server, it's just that the stuff is so expensive (Samba vs. TermServer from MS...MySQL vs MSSQL Server...)How many patches did you have to apply to close security holes?Sometimes it's just easier to wait for the next service pack.When was the last time that your OS burped?I'm happy if 2k server stays up a week... [ More ]

Reply #171

hypersoniq — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:02:48 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #170

WILLSELL — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:55:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Todd on October 25, 2003 WILLSELL:I've been using Microsoft products since the days that they developed the first version of DOS. Microsoft has been one of the best companies ever founded, and it has been through the creation of innovative products. Lottery Post runs on 100% Microsoft software. (With the exception of the Web site of course, which I wrote.)They get an unfair amount of bashing in the media, probably by the same people who wrote the upcoming The Reag... [ More ]

Reply #169

WILLSELL — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:34:50 GMT

Reply #168

Todd — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:20 GMT

WILLSELL:I've been using Microsoft products since the days that they developed the first version of DOS. Microsoft has been one of the best companies ever founded, and it has been through the creation of innovative products. Lottery Post runs on 100% Microsoft software. (With the exception of the Web site of course, which I wrote.)They get an unfair amount of bashing in the media, probably by the same people who wrote the upcoming The Reagans CBS movie. (For those who don't know about the... [ More ]

Reply #167

WILLSELL — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:01:12 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on October 24, 2003 Hi Luckycat:Trying to keep the mind open to just before the point my brain falls out and the cats nibble on it.I like to think there are pearls out there in some of those clams.My money stays firmly in my pocket until I reach the lottery counter.Long as I'm not paying it's hard to complain about the quality of the show. Who am I kidding, I love to complain . . .I'll usually pay to see what the kids have in the box, then try to get them to rel... [ More ]

Reply #166

WILLSELL — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 11:56:39 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Prometheus1 on October 23, 2003 Guru, I said it in the beginning of this thread and I will say it again. There is an obvious disconnect in your system. Normally I would say that this thread was a waste of time, but as long as you are entertaining us, that means you are leaving everyone else in the world alone. Your system is childish, and never takes in to account the natural discretizations of diffusion and any unit of time. Three draws! No! This is not funny, or e... [ More ]

Reply #165

luckycat — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:38:30 GMT

bob pok you sound reasonable/lets see what happens.

Reply #164

DreamLotto — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 02:28:26 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 23, 2003I think it is so cheap and easy to put a system down before LETTING it prove something.And WE find it so mean and difficult to uphold a system being put for sale even BEFORE it P_R_O_V_E_D even 65% of it's worth the claims that accompanied its intro on this forum all along!If you have REALLY decided to call it quits to more testing, than can we say, it was a COMIC beginning with a TRAGIC end?! By the way, seeing your enthu, I reckon that you mu... [ More ]

Reply #163

visiondude — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:45:18 GMT

so much for my ra-ra speech

Reply #162

BobP — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:01:21 GMT

Hi Luckycat:Trying to keep the mind open to just before the point my brain falls out and the cats nibble on it.I like to think there are pearls out there in some of those clams.My money stays firmly in my pocket until I reach the lottery counter.Long as I'm not paying it's hard to complain about the quality of the show. Who am I kidding, I love to complain . . .I'll usually pay to see what the kids have in the box, then try to get them to release it. Don't you want to see what the thing in the... [ More ]

Reply #161

emilyg — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:40:23 GMT

vision

Reply #160

Todd — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:29:03 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #159

Todd — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:26:50 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 21, 2003 Lotto Synchronizer is available from monday 27th at www.lottosync.comGuru, I suppose this message is not supposed to be talking people into buying your system? Give me a break.I think you still don't understand that people have caught on to you.

Reply #158

Prometheus1 — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:59:48 GMT

Guru, I said it in the beginning of this thread and I will say it again. There is an obvious disconnect in your system. Normally I would say that this thread was a waste of time, but as long as you are entertaining us, that means you are leaving everyone else in the world alone. Your system is childish, and never takes in to account the natural discretizations of diffusion and any unit of time. Three draws! No! This is not funny, or even entertaining. Mixed Finite Volume Difference discretiza... [ More ]

Reply #157

BobP — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:18:43 GMT

Done, however I suggest you start a new thread predicting for a randomly chosen game and don't reply to comments, let the predictions speak for themselves. BobP

Reply #156

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:56:22 GMT

I have a proposition.For those that are really interested in following how this test unfolds in the future.I invite you to send me a mail to(marco.de.ruyck@pandora.be) with a note that you want to follow the test by email. This test may continue for half a year or so.I'll always try to send the predicted numbers the day before each draw to your email adresses. (that's if nothing gets inbetween)Thank you,Marco

Reply #155

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:19:13 GMT

It is not me who let things get out of hand Todd. You should read all the previous posts attacking me. I never did anything more than defending my ideas and my system. I don't want to be called a fraud, because I am not a fraud !!! And the strong part is, that I never even tried to talk people into actually buying it. As some members can confirm, I even replied to some folks that if they have their doubts about this system, they should wait and think it over before they order it, or maybe not or... [ More ]

Reply #154

Todd — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:05:09 GMT

ants, that was perfect.

Reply #153

hypersoniq — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:02:14 GMT

Todd, I'm just itching to get into the .NET arena anyway.I might just start from scratch with C# instead of VB (if I can find a good For Dummies guide, that is...

Reply #152

ants — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:52:02 GMT

Mr GuruEver since you arrived in the lottery post I've been skeptical of your claims BUT like the other members in here I gaved you the benefit of the doubt and waited, thus I hardly commented on your postings. The statements I'm about to make is the truth not any attack on your character. The problem began when you tried to unload your unproven system to the members of lp for monetary gain after making outlandish claims you couldn't follow up with. Then you have the gull to accuse the members... [ More ]

Reply #151

Todd — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:07:36 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 23, 2003 I have made up my mind about this, and decided to stop posting numbers here on the forum, or on any other forum. I wanted to go on posting for a long time, since one can only evaluate things over a larger period of time. But I don't see the use of continueing a test in this manner. It cannot be conducted in a serious way here. I'm fed up argueing with those who distribute all the nonsense talk and only want to get things for free. I find it ex... [ More ]

Reply #150

hypersoniq — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:50:30 GMT

I have not been at this for very long, but I can vouch for the fact that the way my setup was going, it was taking many hours just to do the brute-force hunting for matching seeds... I ran a PII 400 with 384 megs of ram... took 11 hours to process 200,000,000 seed possibilities... I never did get to run my exhaustive 20,000,000,000 test... but I might, because I just got a brand-spankin-new FLAMETHROWER... P4 2.4 GHz (6x faster than the old one), 512MB DDR ram on an 800MHz Frontside bus... 120GB... [ More ]

Reply #149

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:14:38 GMT

I have made up my mind about this, and decided to stop posting numbers here on the forum, or on any other forum. I wanted to go on posting for a long time, since one can only evaluate things over a larger period of time. But I don't see the use of continueing a test in this manner. It cannot be conducted in a serious way here. I'm fed up argueing with those who distribute all the nonsense talk and only want to get things for free. I find it extremely childish that an honest and risky test of a n... [ More ]

Reply #148

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:30:16 GMT

dreamlotto,thats g

Reply #147

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:52:46 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 23, 2003 I want to continue, but only if I feel that's being appreciated. I don't have to jump thru hoops for you guys.I just don't like being called dishonest, because that's not how I am. who cares? what drives your passions in life anyway? other peoples opinions of you or you? despite the fact that you haven't proven anything there is still some people in here who are behind you. but that is not the point unless all you care about is relieving p... [ More ]

Reply #146

DreamLotto — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:49:55 GMT

Hi VD:649 Cheers to you!I must agree, VISION sure changes when one is drunk; I am neither a programmer, nor drunk...!GodgrantmethecouragetosafelyreachHOMEwithnomoreargumentswithdrunkdudesHope your vision clears soon and you reach home safely!GreenBacks To You On Your Way Home

Reply #145

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:30:18 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #144

DreamLotto — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:08:35 GMT

Dear Guru:I guess it's enough of verbowar! Let your subsequent posts/replies be in the universal 649 language! The language of Lady Luck! Calling off your test would be of little help, Guru. You have traveled deep inside a desert and just spotted the MUCH wanted water...will you STILL remain THIRSTY?! Think! Stand your ground! Get up! TASTE that cool, life-giving water, Guru! Here is a Grand Test for you...You may want to create a separate topic entitled Guru's Grand Test , away from this noisy... [ More ]

Reply #143

RJOh — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:06:52 GMT

If your work is any good, people will want to pay you to use it and if it isn't they still will have to pay you if they want to use it. It seem to me you are trying to convince people that they should want to use your work because it is better than other people work, but you are going to have to prove that.RJOh

Reply #142

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:47:07 GMT

I don't want to be paid for posting numbers. But I do charge money for using my work. If you can't handle that, then you should go live on an isolated island. Everything is for free there.

Reply #141

RJOh — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:44:17 GMT

I was under the impression you expected to be paid for your efforts not appreciated. Was I wrong?RJOh

Reply #140

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:41:21 GMT

I think it is so cheap and easy to put a system down before LETTING it prove something.

Reply #139

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:40:10 GMT

I want to continue, but only if I feel that's being appreciated. I don't have to jump thru hoops for you guys.I just don't like being called dishonest, because that's not how I am.

Reply #138

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:28:26 GMT

guru,quit the whin

Reply #137

DreamLotto — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:21:43 GMT

Dear Guru!No I Am NOT The Developer Of The Program! I Assumed That ID (The Brand Of The Software I Promote) As I PROMOTE OF That Program In Asia Region!Thanks

Reply #136

RJOh — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:19:17 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #135

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:37:29 GMT

Dreamlotto.Didn't

Reply #134

Guru — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:27:06 GMT

IF I say it is an intensive method to compute, then that's how it is!! I can now it, because I developed it, and you didn't. These past 3 draws have nothing directly to do with the computing time. You say this, because you don't understand the workings of this system at all !!If it wouldn't be doing much more than a random number generator because it only uses 3 past draws. Are you the ones who outlined how many draws are needed ?? Again, clearly, you don't (want to) understand the concept at al... [ More ]

Reply #133

DreamLotto — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:26:41 GMT

Hey Folks,While nb

Reply #132

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:59:53 GMT

oh BTW ; i ju

Reply #131

visiondude — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:48:28 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by luckycat on October 23, 2003 the proof has always been in the puddingthere is another saying S### or get off the pot. luckycat, you provide the sayings and i will provide the visuals ............. potty hall of shame casa de poo-poo if he doesn't back up his claims, he will reside in here. just like all the other big timers before him.he still has time to save himself from the potty hall of shame. he coul... [ More ]

Reply #130

BobP — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:05:33 GMT

I find it rather hard to believe software can burn out a P-II or that a P-II can't handle a prediction based on three previous drawings if there is enough memory on hand. Even the most intensive lottery software like Lotwin and Lottohat seem to run just fine on a P-266.If the average computer, say a P-III 450-600 with 250 megs of ram isn't going to handle the software, minimum requirements need to be stated prior to purchase.There could be a problem if the program dumps millions of combinations... [ More ]

Reply #129

luckycat — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:04:11 GMT

mark s

Reply #128

MarkS — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:50:56 GMT

People, i think you all getting a little impatient and overreacting. Guru clearly stated that he will continue to post numbers here so just wait until friday or saturday. Also as far as prove goes, i dont know how many of you remember that, but when Guru posted his prediction for the first time here, even though it only matched one number, in the next drawing those numbers that lotto synchronizer predicted the first time matched the 4 numbers drawn and Guru stated that sometimes it happens that

Reply #127

luckycat — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:38:18 GMT

the

Reply #126

RJOh — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:22:59 GMT

Guru,With only the last three drawings as data, your program will be operating with little more data than a random number generator. When you first posted your ideas, I thought you were trying to duplicate the random patterns of past drawings to predict future picks, now you say previous drawings have no effect on how number are pick so really all you are doing is picking 10 numbers randomly and wheeling them. Sounds like you are selling a RNG and a 10 number wheel which anyone can get for fre... [ More ]

Reply #125

JAZZY JASPER — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:39:45 GMT

Reply #124

Todd — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:21:30 GMT

WILLSELL, well said.

Reply #123

WILLSELL — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:14:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 22, 2003 It may sometimes have to run for a couple of days on slower computers. Think this is worth the trouble. We are trying to improve the speed for future versions. But more accuracy and faster computing mostly don't go hand in hand i'm afraid. Guru,I have worked with puters for 30 years. First you tell us that you do not collect history for the calculations. So there is no data intensive input to process. Then you tell us that it only requires the... [ More ]

Reply #122

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:13:18 GMT

Some of you really seem to

Reply #121

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:05:27 GMT

I never said we gave that 90% guarantee yet. I always said we were TRYING to get there.

Reply #120

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:03:09 GMT

Check you private inbox enzo

Reply #119

Enzo1 — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:01:30 GMT

if you guarentee 90% of the times, and 1 draw per week, this means that at least on the 6th draw it will come out your prediction!I'm sorry to keep insisting on this, but you CAN give a money back guarentee for 1 month or 2.Get my point

Reply #118

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:53:30 GMT

If you knew on what sl

Reply #117

Todd — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:32:34 GMT

Guru, are you saying that the $100 program you are selling crunches numbers for days on slower computers?The other question I have is why don't you just run it on the PC you're using to type your messages on Lottery Post? Just generate some numbers and post them, shouldn't be a big deal.Don't you see that you're generating more suspicion than lottery numbers

Reply #116

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:33:58 GMT

You should think about the program in this way.If you just guess numbers, a whole lot of blocks have to fall together to win a big prize (they may never fall together for you, even if you play your entire lifetime).If you use Lotto Synchronizer, you still need to wait for some blocks to fall together before you'll win a big prize. But the amount of blocks that need to match up are a lot less. It makes winning feasable in a reasonable amount of time.

Reply #115

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:19:40 GMT

I'm sure about the qualities of the methods we use. But we can not give 100% guarantees. If we give a 30 day money back guarantee. How do you think you are going to evaluate the program in that little time. And giving a 1 year money back guarantee would be stupid.No, those who order it, are those who believe we are pulling the right strings here. Anyone who thinks different should not consider buying it. We don't want to force anyone.

Reply #114

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:11:48 GMT

It may sometimes have to run for a couple of days on slower computers. Think this is worth the trouble. We are trying to improve the speed for future versions. But more accuracy and faster computing mostly don't go hand in hand i'm afraid.

Reply #113

Enzo1 — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:10:27 GMT

People.What I think about this is as fowlling:If GURU is so shure that his program works, so he should give a money back guarentee, right

Reply #112

RJOh — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:04:24 GMT

If Guru' program needs that kind of computer power to pick a few numbers, will it work fast enough on the average home computer to pick numbers before the next drawing?RJOh

Reply #111

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:58:39 GMT

I don't need a complete renderfarm for Lotto Synchronizer. But they were all occupied. When computers are rendering animation frames, it's risky to run other processing intensive programs. This may freeze our entire renderfarm or frames may be skipped. Don't want this kind of trouble when we are on a tight deadline.ps: We don't use massive historical draw files to process the numbers. We only use the 3 most recent draws. The time consuming factor comes from a completely different thing. I may ex... [ More ]

Reply #110

RJOh — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:55:40 GMT

BobP,Never buy a goose expecting it to lay a golden egg, such things are as rare as lottery programs that predict jackpot winners and neither will ever be sold.RJOh

Reply #109

Todd — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:48:28 GMT

Guru,I am confused by the amount of horsepower you feel is necessary to crunch lottery numbers. Even if you took a game with much more history, like Florida or New Jersey, you're talking about thousands of numbers, not millions. Even with millions of combinations (or whatever you're doing) it is not so difficult or time-consuming for a computer to process.Perhaps your programming should be refined? I don't mean to be too hard on you, but saying that you need a server farm for crunching lotter... [ More ]

Reply #108

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:39:13 GMT

I'm sorry again for disappointing you all. But all computers are Rendering animation frames this week. Maybe some of you know how time consuming and how much processing power is needed for that. Can't force Lotto Synchronizer inbetween that, since it also demands a lot from the processor.Still have to take that first (deadlines don't move). We're trying to run a decent animation studio here.

Reply #107

BobP — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:48:11 GMT

Hey, I'm not saying to run out and buy. I'm just saying to hang tight and wait for proof it works. I don't want to see any of those fake playing with the timezone kind of bogus tests either. Most draws are three or four days apart, more then enough time to run off a number of predictions for a dozen games at a time and post them days before the draw. If you want to sell the golden goose you have to demonstrate it laying the eggs.As for random number generators, I find they tend to cluster n... [ More ]

Reply #106

luckycat — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:18:11 GMT

I think we should listen to

Reply #105

luckycat — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:15:07 GMT

how can anyone buy a s

Reply #104

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:27:57 GMT

Sorry I was unable to post

Reply #103

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:22:56 GMT

Hypersoniq:the predicted numbers are not weighted or ordered on probability.They are ordered beginning with the smallest ending with the biggest number.

Reply #102

hypersoniq — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:13:58 GMT

Guru,I forgot to ask this before, but are your 10 picks weighted or ordered in any way, or are all 10 equal ? (like the first 3 are more probable to come up than the second 3, 1 thru 10 are based on some most likely order, etc...

Reply #101

visiondude — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:07:52 GMT

visiondude's tip of the day ... never allow yourself to get suckered in by nice and sincere . people that are selling things are marketing themselves first. that means that they use your first impression on whether their product is worthy, by gaining your trust via selling themselves. in the side door they come dressed all nice and pretty. promising the world, but delivering IRAQ. their ability to sell lay in the words and delivery and so far guru is excellant at it.43 pages wort... [ More ]

Reply #100

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:52:59 GMT

ToddI'm sure our program has been tested a lot more on past draws than some other developers did. We did not make a fancy tool with lots of flickering lights and dozens of buttons that can do no better than guessing. We created a method with te true intension that it should really work !!! And it will.Just wait, look and you'll dventually see it happen here right under your noses !!!This is the beginning, not the end.

Reply #99

Guru — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:44:28 GMT

I'm not running away of anything.I'll keep posting numbers here. I'm confident the program WILL PROOVE IT'S WORTH THE 87 Euro. But you cannot expect it to hit 5 correct withing the first 5 tests or so ????What did you expect guys, 1 Euro. We,ve worked for a year and a half intensively on this method. We are not going to charge a price that makes us feel ripped of ourselves.If you think it's not worth the money, then don't buy it. Simple as that.

Reply #98

Todd — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:16:34 GMT

BobP,I think the guy's basically run away from any tests after the first debacle. Also, the fact that he's throwing a completely untested system onto the market for $100 demonstrates his intentions pretty clearly. I wouldn't go holding out much hope at this point.I'll go head-to-head with the Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator against his system any day.