lotto synchronizer problems!!

Reply #11

BobP — Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:08:09 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on November 10, 2003 I'm not ashamed for having bought lottobuster or the vibration math cd, or lottohat, or the honest lotto system in the past too. Although overtime, these systems proved to me that they were not capable of winning me any money. I do think that those who developed these systems, did put a lot of work in it, and that's what I payed for. I think Lottohat and the honest lotto system have potential to win if the user is wise to the balances of lott... [ More ]

Reply #10

underdog — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:50:59 GMT

no you will not have to buy other software to wheel your numbers as a 10 number wheel is included in the software and a very good wheel i might add it is 10 numbers that generates 30 combinations!!! and guarantees 5 3 number prizes when 3 numbers are chosen!!! good luck

Reply #9

WILLSELL — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:41:34 GMT

Ok someone help me out.Guru's system only generates the selection.Does that mean I would have to buy something else to do the actual wheeling?Do all wheels yield the same results given a set of numbers

Reply #8

RJOh — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:35:31 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on November 10, 2003 I'm not ashamed for having bought lottobuster or the vibration math cd, or lottohat, or the honest lotto system in the past too. Although overtime, these systems proved to me that they were not capable of winning me any money. I do think that those who developed these systems, did put a lot of work in it, and that's what I payed for. I agree with Guru, when you buy a lottery program you aren't necessarily paying for something that works but... [ More ]

Reply #7

lottoshlep — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:52:31 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #6

Guru — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 06:23:25 GMT

Hmm, I read people are ashamed to admit they bought our system. I don't think anyone should be ashamed, since it is probably the only thing around, that could actually win them money on the lottos. When the first LottoSynchronizer users win with the system, a lot of others will smack their heads for not having it bought earlier. I'm certainly not ashamed for being the creator of it, and I'm not ashamed for having bought lottobuster or the vibration math cd, or lottohat, or the honest lotto syst... [ More ]

Reply #5

Guru — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 06:07:43 GMT

Underdog:Did you already notify me of your problem in my mailbox ? There is a faster beta of v1.6 available you know.But, since U use the handle Underdog. I don't know who you are??I've received a few remarks from others about the prediction speed of the original 1.5 version (mainly from those who are making predictions for lottos with more than 55 balls). All those people have received a significantly faster updated version for free. Send me a mail to me personal adress, and I will send you th... [ More ]

Reply #4

RJOh — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:58:52 GMT

Luckyhorse tried to sell several systems on this forum, so it's hard for me to believe that he would get suckered on somebody else's system. But I guess what goes around comes around.

Reply #3

lottoshlep — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:19 GMT

Luckycat,I did nbs

Reply #2

luckycat — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:49:44 GMT

I am suprised that anyo

Reply #1

lottoshlep — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:06:32 GMT

Hmmm ...may have

lotto synchronizer problems!!

underdog — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:22:10 GMT

hi guru! i recently purchased your lottosync software but having trouble running it! it seems my computer which is an older model pentium 2 cannot processs the info fast enough thus it takes a good 3 days just to get a prediction of 2 of the 10 numbers is there a way for me to use the program that will speed up the prediction process??? about how many string have to be built at 400 samples before the program will list the full 10 numbers