lottoking ousted

Reply #75

luckycat — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:10:53 GMT

todd> was just about to

Reply #74

fja — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:47:10 GMT

Oh, I didnt know that, I stand corrected, please disrecard.Thanks Todd

Reply #73

Todd — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:18:59 GMT

fja,The view counter does not count the number of people of viewed a thread, only the number of times it was viewed. If I visited the thread 10 times, it would increase the counter by 10. I also assume that many non-members visited the thread, so there's no way to measure what percentage of Lottery Post members saw the thread vs. voted in it.Luckycat, if you're looking for 100 members to vote on something, I don't think you'll get it with a negative topic like this. Needs to be something posi... [ More ]

Reply #72

fja — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:07:39 GMT

1350 people came through this thread, thats 45% of the lp population, 31 people found it had merit of one kind or another, 21 people found it had no merit and dicarded their vote....the rest just didn't care. So my guess is that it's just not that big a deal..

Reply #71

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:02:50 GMT

In realty the poll has changed some today,maybe it should run longer??11 people voted >he should leave on his own accord >and believe it to be a scam.12 people voted him to stay>of course on his own accord.still not a justified vote too little votes,if had at least 100 voters it would prob give a fairer opinion.

Reply #70

Calscorp — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:38:50 GMT

No, I am just defending the principle of the idea.

Reply #69

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:36:18 GMT

calscope:maybe you should have read> all his posts and maybe you would have understood better, as to 2 months of garbage,from LOTTOKINKthe poll was only a opinion poll. it can do nothing else just opinion.its up to LOTTOKINK to stay or leave, it always has and always will be his choice. the poll was not justified too low of votes. opinions .thanks for your reply,but in defending someone maybe you should have read all the posts first.best regards

Reply #68

Calscorp — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:35:01 GMT

As I do not follow lottoking and do not play their systems ; I do not need to be classified with them. Thanks.Calscorp

Reply #67

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:25:41 GMT

dream lotto:(you are following him to use on your selfpubweb site correct) so in essence you are useing him for your own purpose. GOOD.you and hypersong,bigmoney,ANTS,lottoshlep,irvin,dnynado,calscorp,four4 me> are tailing lottokink in hopes of finding the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. its fools gold. ( 9 of you aprx in all I am sure voted the stay, and that's ok. this is america, and I hold no grudges,I see thru his scam and did the poll to see how others looked at it. it was only a... [ More ]

Reply #66

Calscorp — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:08:23 GMT

Your health was only mentioned because your words come across with so much anger. And I had no intention of increasing your anger.I am not a lottoking follower. I read some of his posts. And I stopped.As I said before, I do not like the idea of polls being there to get people ousted off lotterypost. It is Todd's decisions when people are asked to leave or get kicked off.I have no fight with you. I only expressed an opinion.Deb

Reply #65

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:05:27 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #64

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:00:15 GMT

four4 meI BELIEVE YOU SHOULD SEE A SHRINK NOT ME> FOR FOLLOWING LOTTOKINKSPELLED CORRRECTLY> I AM IN GOOD HEALTH ANGRY YES TO SEE A SCAM AND TRY TO HELP OTHERS NOT FALL FOR IT.. I OVERCOME MY ANGER as I HOLD NO GRUDGES., AND KNOWING I HAVE AT LEAST TRIED TO HELP OTHERS NOT GET INVOLVED WITH THE SPACE CADET lottokink HAS BEEN MY PRIME GOAL.Your have been warned of the scam and still continue to followTHE FOOLS GOLD. but THATS YOUR CHOICE.THE POLL SPLIT 50%/STAY - 50% LEAVE AND BELIEVE HIM TO B... [ More ]

Reply #63

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:47:47 GMT

calscope:yes this is about dif opinions.yes this is about LOTTOKINK spelled correctly.NO THERE IS NOTHING WRONG ABOUT MY HEALTHY ANGER: BUT THANKS FOR YOUR CONCERN.EVIDENTLY YOU HAVE NOT READ lottokinks posts> he does nothing but attack other members verbly, swears, and d### people too, so don't give me that bit, go directly to the person who has been attacking everyone else daily LOTTOKINK.MY healthy anger, was the poll which 29 votes was a 50/50/ split.where 50% believe he should leave and... [ More ]

Reply #62

lottoshlep — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:40:31 GMT

I think you're addressing the wrong guy luckycat, I'm finished with this matter and haven't posted anything re: your healthHave a nicer day

Reply #61

JAZZY JASPER — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:39:10 GMT

Hmmm

Reply #60

luckycat — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:31:38 GMT

lottoshlep; IF you reread previous post regards spelling lottokinkIT IS NO MISTAKE ON MY PART as I explained to you on past post yesterday.HIS NAME IS TO ME LOTTOKINK kink not king is how I regard him.spelled correct.and ITS SPELLED THAT WAY ON PURPOSE IN MY BOOK>you are putting a false impression of me. I see a scam artist ,and wanted to set it straight as to all his leads leading to misleads. and because u are one of the followers,it appears you don.t care about his words or action's . th... [ More ]

Reply #59

DreamLotto — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 05:23:32 GMT

Wow F4M!That was really Four For Lucky Cat...! You Gave It Nicely To Her!I Now Really Wonder ...WHATEVER Stops Her From Blocking LottoKing, If SHE REALLY Dislikes His Posts?!You Are Also Right When You Say I Think You Really Like This LottoKing... , For We All Know...Friendship Stars With A Quarrel And Lasts Longer And Stronger...! Moreover, I Have Seen This Happen To Me Many A Times On Yahoo Chat...Two-Thirds Of My Lady Chat Friends Initially Quarrelled With Me And Denied Access To Their Web C... [ More ]

Reply #58

four4me — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 05:09:07 GMT

Luckycat I sincerely hope you don't have a heart attack I have been to lots of user groups and read many posts but this one takes the cake. I vote you stay because if you keep up like your going you'll be seeing the shrink soon. And I would pay to here you tell the shrink that you blew a gasket because of some guy that posted on a usenet. Promises that he couldn't keep. numbers that didn't hit, etc., etc. Listen to yourself are you actually that screwed up over this.I think you really like this... [ More ]

Reply #57

JAZZY JASPER — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:20:12 GMT

Hmmm

Reply #56

LaurainMass — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:12:48 GMT

Wow Wee...I just got here and people want to throw others out.I hope it's not over something someone said...Laurajean Watters

Reply #55

Calscorp — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:42:27 GMT

My vote was also discarded. I also agree that you don't have to continue this fight. This much anger is not good for your health, luckycat. I would have voted for lack of interest.I do not care for the idea that someone can get mad at someone and try to get them ousted off the lotterypost. Everyone has the right to their ideas and opinions. If you don't like them don't read them. I would hate for people on the post to start feeling they cannot express their ideas and opinions for fear of being... [ More ]

Reply #54

lottoking — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:08:26 GMT

Lets stop here ,luckycat.I think you are tired enough.lottoking

Reply #53

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:05:02 GMT

today sunday:the poll has not moved too much it will remain till 9 am mondayso far it seems to be almost same for both sides. aprx50% vote against lottokink saying he is a scam and think should leave on his own50% voted for him to stay the poll closes 9 am monday Dec 8thanking all that voted and hope more will vote to see true resultsthanks

Reply #52

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:48:54 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #51

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 05:04:57 GMT

lottoshlep:are you saying that my spelling lottokink who is a kink and they agreeand the other members believe that too, thats why a low turnout vote.,because they think he is a kink too????no I dont think so. or maybe so???but thanks for your nice reply.....I do have to take into consideration percentage wise as to the response to the members who voted in other negitive questions vs the stay question and it comes out aprx 50/50 split. stay- go but again its only a opinion poll,just opini... [ More ]

Reply #50

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 04:50:10 GMT

No disrespect intended luckycat, I am not siding with anyone but will say one more thing, then drop out of this discussion. There are only 2 important questions in the poll: vote him out? vote him to stay?All are opinions but only the two above matter should the administrator decide to act upon this poll, the rest are 'window dressing' at best. But even the minimal results speak for themselves, I think we know who placed the 1 'out' vote.Cheers

Reply #49

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 04:17:33 GMT

..... IT IS SPELLED PURPOSFULLY BECAUSE HE IS NO KING HE IS A KINK THUS lottokink. Hehehe ... exactly my point. Why do you think most members are not participating in your poll

Reply #48

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 04:02:00 GMT

LOTTOSHLEP:HIS NAME HAS NOT BEEN MISSPELLED IT IS SPELLED PURPOSFULLY BECAUSE HE IS NO KING HE IS A KINK THUS lottokink. THE ORIGINAl HEADING WAS WRITTEN should BUT IT DID NOT POST THAT WAY, THINK IT WAS A SPACE THING.however I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE HERE not likeing what lottokink does. as the poll shows its about 50/50 split. and really with so little votes not a trueresult. I am also trying to show the members that he truly is a hoax,'others agree with me as thru my private pms. bu... [ More ]

Reply #47

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 03:44:54 GMT

luckycat,there's t

Reply #46

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 03:22:25 GMT

irvin:supprised to see you: so farthe poll is almost 50/50 split > 50 % negative 50% positive must be raining out> out of 3000 voters only 26 voted a low turnout . so farbut what ever the poll's outcome at least we had the opinion and freedom to vote a voice in our choices. the final outcome will be justified,to show the truth.thanks for looking in Irvin. green bucks to you

Reply #45

lottoarchitect — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 03:18:41 GMT

CAN YOU STOP FIGHTING?????This is rediculous, if you keep going this way you are worse than what you allegate lottoking is. I haven't seen anyone else dislike so much lottoking as you do luckycat. I really don't get your point or what are you trying to prove. Do you hate lottoking? Did he steal money from you or whatever?? Calm down.Lottoking, don't push it either. I admire you want to share your knowledge/ideas with us. This is more than welcome. But keep using a low profile. Posting, all over... [ More ]

Reply #44

lottoking — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 03:17:18 GMT

I am ignoring a childish person,irvin.I think why less than 3000 ip members vote is simply because they are not even interested in her poll.hope that make any senselottoking

Reply #43

Irvin — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 03:00:38 GMT

Am I reading the wrong poll results here

Reply #42

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:55:34 GMT

LOTTOKINK ; you are startin

Reply #41

Irvin — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:50:18 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by luckycat on December 06, 2003it seems like the poll is split 2 ways,,,,so farvote stay 42%leave and scam believed 26%26 votes out of a 3000 membership. less than 1% of total members voted.If we just look at the Go and Stay figures we get 3.85% and 42%.I think that really tells it.PS. I hope you voted Lottoking

Reply #40

lottoking — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:40:56 GMT

hi dear fellowsI have not been watching how this poll is going on but when I wake up this morning,wow,I find there are some obvious changes 16 discarded!Better than I thought it could be.As for one thing we better be clear,it seems luckycat is yelling all way along being a little child.Why do you still waste your time talking to a native child only knowing playing those nonsense games?I will be willing to see more of your thoughts even though I knew it wouldn't be much better.for all my supporte... [ More ]

Reply #39

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:40:12 GMT

it seems like the poll is split 2 ways,,,,so far vote stay 42%leave and scam believed 26% 26 votes out of a 3000 membership. less than 1% of total members voted.

Reply #38

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:19:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by DreamLotto on December 06, 2003 Dear Todd,I am curious to know if LuckyCat is a shareholder/investor/partner of yours/companies owned by you!! She really seems to take a front seat whenever LottoKing falls, falters or fails! Who is she to oust/gather opinion about outsting anyone?!Hey now, friends, DON'T you think it's about time this CAT's claws are clipped and grinded to make her MORE friendly?!YOU ASKED IF I WAS A SHAREHOLDER?I AM SURE you are rediculius. However... [ More ]

Reply #37

fja — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:09:28 GMT

I disrecarded the vote: simply because this is what we are all about...the ability to shout your beliefs at the top of your lungs while those who oppose you stand right next to you and shout out their beliefs,,,I'm not voting...If Todd thought he was even close to crossing the line he would have fired a warning shot. No, freedom of speech is important, learn to live with it, learn to drown it out or ignore it, cause dventually if it doesn't have substance, it will always disappear.

Reply #36

luckycat — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:00:57 GMT

post members:this is just a poll to know how other members feel about the empty promises for the last 2 months, with no win, or true systems, that lottokink, has pursued that he can do , and in fact has done nothing except cause turmel with many here.the poll will only reflect that oponion.right now the poll is split almost same amount think he should leave on his own accord and believe he is a scam::::: and the almost same amount think he should stay.I can do nothing as to what the poll... [ More ]

Reply #35

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 23:20:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by DreamLotto on December 06, 2003 Dear Todd,I am curious to know if LuckyCat is a shareholder/investor/partner of yours/companies owned by you!! She really seems to take a front seat whenever LottoKing falls, falters or fails! Who is she to oust/gather opinion about outsting anyone?!Hey now, friends, DON'T you think it's about time this CAT's claws are clipped and grinded to make her MORE friendly?!Dream lotto: YOU MUST be dreaming/ you know better:I believe you are... [ More ]

Reply #34

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 23:08:45 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #33

Guru — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:52:21 GMT

Hypersoniq:I'm willing to continue a theory discussion. Somehow it was overwhelmed along the way.You should realize though that there are things I can not tell.

Reply #32

hypersoniq — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:35:10 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on December 06, 2003 You make it sound as if selling my program is a crime.No, but you have to admit (success or not) that starting a discussion that had the makings of a great thread on theory only to end up with a $$$ pitch does ring a bit of bait-and-switch... wouldn't you agree?I for one would rather toy with a formula (flawed or not) and draw my own conclusions for free than pay any $$$ for some black box technology. I voted in support of lottoking... nobo... [ More ]

Reply #31

DreamLotto — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:05:35 GMT

Dear Todd,I am curious to know if LuckyCat is a shareholder/investor/partner of yours/companies owned by you!! She really seems to take a front seat whenever LottoKing falls, falters or fails! Who is she to oust/gather opinion about outsting anyone?!Hey now, friends, DON'T you think it's about time this CAT's claws are clipped and grinded to make her MORE friendly?!Good Luck

Reply #30

Irvin — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:40:48 GMT

After reading more into this, especially Ants good comments, I have decided to vote for him to stay.The other reason being is that we have no right to say who goes or stays. So if we have to vote I vote stay.This is an open forum for ideas to be thrown around. If we dont like them we let it be known to that person I mean I have bought Lottosync and I still gave Guru a bit of a go in the begining.....I'm still back testing it though.As for ideas been thrown around let everyone do that. If you don... [ More ]

Reply #29

Littleoldlady — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:25:46 GMT

I voted for him to stay, too. His posts even though different are just like anyone else's...the luck of the draw...personally, I feel that anyone who bothers to post numbers deserves some props ..hit or not. Sometimes it takes hours and the hours can turn into days..just to come up with some numbers that may help someone else win..let us be grateful for ALL of the posters we have at the lottery post.

Reply #28

ants — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 19:51:07 GMT

lucky catI'm ending this conversation here because obviously you either don't get the point I'm trying to make about lotto king or you refuse to get the point I'm trying to make.Bottom line we are all indiviuals with wants and needs and we tend to make mistakes. We all want the same thing which is to master the lottery and I believe lotto king is a vital part of helping EVERYONE to learn more about the lotto period.

Reply #27

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:39:56 GMT

aga

Reply #26

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:37:26 GMT

bigmoney:no one is beating up on LOTTOKINK. we are just tired of all his empty promises for 2 months. and getting no where. If a person cannot do what they promise in 2 months, and a man is as good as his word..maybe that person should say he cant perform as promised, and stop leading people on.with one excuce after another.do you promise and don t do??I keep my promises do or die.

Reply #25

bigmoney — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:28:17 GMT

Stop beating up on lottoking. He gave what he thought were winning #. IT S CALLED GAMBLING! NO GUARANTEES!! I'm sure if lottoking had the psychic powers to pick winning # all the time, he would be laying on the beach in the islands sipping on a drink, basking in the sunshine. Better yet, he would be would not be playing #. He would be in Vegas, sitting at the tables where there is real money to be won.

Reply #24

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:27:38 GMT

thanks nbs

Reply #23

Guru — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:17:12 GMT

Ants:You make it sound as if selling my program is a crime. You too have a job I suppose. And I think someone is paying you for that work too.At least some people already won with my LottoSynchronizer system.Underdog matched 5 out of 10 and won 10 times 4 and 10 times 3 in his canadian lotto.I believe it was vick who hit 8 out of 10 in his keno game, and just missed out on a 9 out of 10.Another forum reader who wanted to stay anonymous has hit 3 times 4 out of 10 in only four tries in the NY lot... [ More ]

Reply #22

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:51:06 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by luckycat on December 06, 2003 ants:most of all your posts in past have supported LOTTOKINK.ON oct 28th you said you have a tecnique winning you 4 out of 7 several times.why dont you share that with LOTTOKINK cause he has not given or shared NOT one good draw winning number. only empty promises and lots of time wasted, keeping people on a high to only get repeatedly downs.maybe you and he can come up with proof of the pudding a win draw that all of us can share

Reply #21

hypersoniq — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 16:52:40 GMT

For whatever faults may seem apparent, lottoking DID post HOW he got his picks, even if it doesn't make sense to most. MATH is a universal language, ignore the words and just look at what the formula is... now, I don't agree with throwing any bonus balls like PB or MB in the main mix, and I don't get the WHY of it... but how often to people post formulas? hats off...I DO think one coherent post would be more appealing than a chain of 20 to get 1 message across, but maybe he reads alot of Stephen... [ More ]

Reply #20

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:52:26 GMT

ant:I really believe that many members would enjoy to win even smaller prizes.as you say your technique does. but you said several times you have won. soo lottokink has not produced even 1 small dollar win.. read past posts.so I say that if u care to share your technique of getting several small wins as they do add up as u say. why dont you.? or like I said tell LOTTOKINK and maybe you 2 can improvise. so far now LOTTOKINK is a big fat ZERO no predicts that have or can win since he ca... [ More ]

Reply #19

ants — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:42:50 GMT

By the way couple weeks back I did remember lottoking matching 3 out of 6 numbers in the ohio 6/49 lotto. I don't bother with powerballs or follow them because they are a lot more difficult to predict, maybe thats where lotto king has a weak point and why many of you attacked him. His strongest points are with the regular lottos like pick 3,4,5 and 6. If he sticks more to his strong points like regular lottos he may very well make winners out of all of us, as well as believers out of his crit... [ More ]

Reply #18

ants — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:31:12 GMT

You have a good point lucky

Reply #17

lottoarchitect — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:18:57 GMT

It's not matter of nationality I think. Otherwise you wouldn't talk to me neither. It's just the way lottoking tries to make most of us pay attention to him. I really hate posts stating I'll win for you, just tell which lottery you want . Althought there is nothing wrong by this statement itself, lottoking does this by an annoying and offending manner to our intelligence. I'll not vote him to leave as he gave away a formula of his own, I read it, I liked it and it seems he has a lot to offer he... [ More ]

Reply #16

fast eddie — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:17:18 GMT

We all have a Lottoking in our lives...............................

Reply #15

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:52:41 GMT

ants:most of all your posts in past have supported LOTTOKINK.ON oct 28th you said you have a tecnique winning you 4 out of 7 several times.why dont you share that with LOTTOKINK cause he has not given or shared NOT one good draw winning number. only empty promises and lots of time wasted, keeping people on a high to only get repeatedly downs.maybe you and he can come up with proof of the pudding a win draw that all of us can share in HOW YOU DO IT.

Reply #14

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:23:24 GMT

proof will b

Reply #13

ants — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:16:32 GMT

Hello allI haven't been around for awhile, being on a hiatus and all. I see lucky cat is sharpening her claws in lotto king's head, lol. I usually dont vote on polls and this is my first pool participation actually. I think this is an important poll however, I voted for lotto king to stay because I still believe in the method to his madness, king you still have my support. Lets cut lottoking a break, I can tell hes really trying and wants to help pl members win the big one and as one of his... [ More ]

Reply #12

Irvin — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:58:39 GMT

I have to admit I have not taken much notice of Lottokings posts. Infact I dont know what you guys are on about.I very rarely visit other posts on LP outside of lotto systems.And as stated earlier by others if they are offensive or full of crap then just ignore them.

Reply #11

dvdiva — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:16:24 GMT

i used to think he was just a spammer now i think he's just insane although his posts have been getting funnier and weirder with time.of course it could be that he's not human

Reply #10

emilyg — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:12:04 GMT

rjoh - no free lunch, eh

Reply #9

RJOh — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:07:34 GMT

Believe it of not, posts like those of lottoking may be a lot of B.S., but they get a lot of attention. There are entertaining and they are free. Most of us posters and readers are old enough to know you don't get much for nothing. RJOh

Reply #8

Tx_Mega_Player — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:06:59 GMT

Luckycat, Too bad I can only vote once. I voted that he should stay, but I also think he is a scam. But I guess you can't be a scammer without someone that willing to be your scammee....

Reply #7

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:42:50 GMT

tx mega playerif u want big bucks better stay away from lottokink's predicts as his have been cow pies. better to pick out of a hat maybe.blessings and green bucks to you

Reply #6

Tx_Mega_Player — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:36:42 GMT

Todd, I ususally don't check my numbers until the next day, so tomorrow will tell if I won anything. I'm just happy that I will be able to pay for jackpots higher than what Lotto Texas usually offers. I'm chasing the big dollars - the very big dollars. Maybe for the nexct drawing I'll play one of lottoking's sets (ha, ha)....

Reply #5

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:30:41 GMT

please vote if you post a r

Reply #4

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:29:28 GMT

yes I do intend to some day

Reply #3

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:25:11 GMT

thanks TODD appreciate your

Reply #2

Tx_Mega_Player — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:22:19 GMT

I absolutely disagree with you luckycat. I don't think that lotto king should be ousted. I do think that everything he posts is a bunch of bulls#*t, but the only reason he keeps posting is because you and others like you keep responding to his post. If everyone justed ignored his post, he would stop posting - or at least he would only correspond with those that want to hear what he has to say. So instead of trying to control what he does, just use the control that you already have - and that is... [ More ]

Reply #1

Todd — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:16:57 GMT

Don't worry, luckycat. I don't think we're divided at all. These things happen from time to time (ask any of the long-timers here), and it always sounds worse than it is. Hang in there and don't let it get to you

lottoking ousted

luckycat — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:03:25 GMT

lotto king has corrupted the lottery post/ members against one another, a house divided will soon fall. I think he should be a guest only not allowed any posting privilages.I feel we would all calm down better without all his antics/ and empty promises/ we should be using our talents more usefull in time and money.I wonder how other members feel.are you all fed up yet.