question for guru!!

Reply #6

Guru — Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:59:37 GMT

Vick:I know the effect you describe. It is no bug or memory problem, it has to do with the starting point in random space. Illustration of what happen. Suppose the numbers below are steps in random space. Step 46 Contains a solution from wich LottoSynchronizer picks 1 or 2 numbers.When you start the prediction, this could happen:5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47...Or this could happen:41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4... [ More ]

Reply #5

vick — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:53:14 GMT

Guru i find that sometimes the program gets bogged down and takes along time to predict, like the string count getting real high sometimes in the 1000's, then i would exit the program reboot the computer and i would find that it would sometimes predict MUCH FASTER after the reboot. Is there some kind of memory hog clitch or affect etc??.

Reply #4

Guru — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:12:21 GMT

There is no simple mathematical way of recalculating the odds when using LottoSynchronizer.Your odds of winning will improve significantly, but it is impossible to stick a number on it. It varies from draw to draw.

Reply #3

BobP — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 04:42:50 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by underdog on December 08, 2003 using lottosync what do you feel our odds have been brought down to??? without lotto sync = 1 in 13983316 with lottosync in use 1in ???? do you have the answers??? The odds using LottoSync or any other method that picks 10 number to play out of 6/49 assuming we were fully wheeling the 10 numbers improves the odds of winning, to . . .6 if 6 1 in 66,589.605 if 6 1 in 422.854 if 6 1 in 89.863 if 6 1 in 12.752 if 6 1 in 3.78It takes 210

Reply #2

RJOh — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 01:13:46 GMT

In a 6/49 lottery, there are 13,983,316 possible combinations, thus odds of 1:1393316. I have run tests using a RNG that pick combinations at random and it has matched all six number many times in less than 25,000 picks, but that didn't mean the odd were reduce to 1:25K using a RNG and I've read that many times when someone wins the 649 lotteries, 70% or less of all combinations were covered, but that doesn't mean the odds were actually 1:9788321. If the odds could be reduce to even 1:200000 u... [ More ]

Reply #1

patricia — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:50:38 GMT

if anyone has the answer to the lottery we would not be on the web if i have that software i would like to hit asap need some money

question for guru!!

underdog — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:39:53 GMT

using lottosync what do you feel our odds have been brought down to??? without lotto sync = 1 in 13983316 with lottosync in use 1in ???? do you have the answers