could this be conspiracy??

Reply #26

BobP — Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:02:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by underdog on January 07, 2004 thats what i thought thats why i dont play the bc/49 and stick with the national because i feel the computer can be adjusted to perform slightly less than random and a drum machine with balls can be tampered with but it would have to be the balls and they are checked frequently i believe every draw they do a preliminary draw before doing an actual draw!!! anyway i'am running my lottosync right now for the next can 6/49 draw with samples s... [ More ]

Reply #25

hypersoniq — Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:50:44 GMT

I have said this before and I'll say it again... it's too long to fit as a sig or I would do that too......Quote Me...I would never sell a system... but if I did... I would market it as such...1. Post some specific picks to PROVE it worked, not broad horoscope-style 100 numbers for 40 states while explaining that they are the result of a new system. And not for lotteries that the potential customers cannot play. and a manageable field, say $10 or less...2. Do it again... to rope in the doub... [ More ]

Reply #24

Guru — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:48:23 GMT

Paul:I'm too occupied with running our company and creating our soft that I really don't have the time to put energy in something else.+ I get so much mail from people presenting me their challenges and systems

Reply #23

paul762 — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:39:21 GMT

hi guru, could you tell me why you didnt take up this guys lotto challenge, i understand that he should not be entered into the chase but you didnt mention why you didnt participate in his lotto challenge

Reply #22

Guru — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:13:41 GMT

Rjoh:LottoSynchronizer is not only for the canadian lotto !!!!It works on every pick 6 lottery. Let that be clear.I don't know Vick and Underdog personally. They are just happy customers of our software. (well, at least I hope they are happy with it)It's so easy to search for a scam plan behind everything that seems to work.

Reply #21

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:40:39 GMT

thats what i thought thats why i dont play the bc/49 and stick with the national because i feel the computer can be adjusted to perform slightly less than random and a drum machine with balls can be tampered with but it would have to be the balls and they are checked frequently i believe every draw they do a preliminary draw before doing an actual draw!!! anyway i'am running my lottosync right now for the next can 6/49 draw with samples set at 650 it should be done by tomrrow night lol!!!! [pe... [ More ]

Reply #20

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:26:45 GMT

your right underdog, i think BC's making a BIG mistake, you should complain.Here in Ontario it's all balls in the machine expect for daily keno which is electronic.

Reply #19

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:21:16 GMT

the funny thing is they think if they double the jackpot and make it $2,000,000 every draw this will encourage people to play more but you know what it wont!!! if you want to get people to play more then give them more prizes back like for example make it cost $2 but give people a free play for having 1 number or for having 2 numbers award them $5 its all psychological really if people think they can win anything even small amounts they will play

Reply #18

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:11:37 GMT

yeah thats what i'am saying! does your ontario lotto use electronic or drum to select numbers

Reply #17

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:07:30 GMT

ya something doesn't seem right in the BC lotto, no other province is raising their provincial lotto's prices in May [including lotto mad Quebec Ontario] + from what i understand they use a computer to pick the twice weekly BC 649 ?underdog so your saying that in the new May Bc 649 if there is no winners they won't carry it over to next draw? That sucks man. It sure ain't worth the $1 ticket i would complain if i were you guys either way Best of Luck

Reply #16

RJOh — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:07:16 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on January 07, 2004 Mostly Vick and Underdog post their numbers before the draw and afterwards report their winnings. The comments I made was a response to this statement after I checked to see if it was true and found it misleading. I don't play the Canadian lotteries so Guru's program isn't something I can use. Good luck to you fellows.RJOh

Reply #15

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:05:44 GMT

imagine having your own lottery where a jacpot isnt guaranteed to be won and you do not have to increase it in the next draw if it was mine!!!!! i would be getting rich really faaaaast

Reply #14

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:02:13 GMT

yeah i know !!!! now theres a conspiracy my feeling on this is thats fine but if they do not want to carryover the unwon jackpot then the person with 5 out of 6 plus the bonus should be the jackpot winner otherwise the b.c. government has a complete ripoff scheme being set in place

Reply #13

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:54:20 GMT

sounds like a plan underdog, it's too bad that your BC lotto is gunna raise their BC 649 to $1 in May when Canada 649 goes to $2, luckily here in Ontario it stays at 50 cents a crack

Reply #12

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:53:32 GMT

hey vick lets start swapping predictions i will give you can 6/49 you give me ont 6/49 through private message as i have a friend in ontario that plays regularly sound good

Reply #11

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:50:02 GMT

in fact i just won again tonight, in my provincial 649 4/10 {using 300}+ 3/10 [using last weeks numbers{ used 650}] !! will check my keno shortly

Reply #10

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:38:10 GMT

no kiddding its amazing the number of people that want to be spoon fed

Reply #9

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:34:46 GMT

haha you guys crack me up, it's almost childish heheheh.I have bought many lotto programs, not only Guru's. You gotta pay to play. You gotta take a chance, it's only a $100 or so, i have bought lots of other programs and i'll probably buy other's future programs as well.Goodluck All

Reply #8

underdog — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:30:24 GMT

oh give me a break!!!! if you want to know what happens after the drawing do the research yourself i only posted this sight over and over again www.bclc.com if you can read you will be able to research! furthermore why cater to you???? buy the program yourself!!!!! as i did if it doesnt live up to its expectations return it i think guru will gladly refund your purchase price

Reply #7

RJOh — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:20:51 GMT

I am still looking for those wins that were posted before the drawing. I see a list of numbers posted before drawings but no follow-up as to what happen during the drawing or after just another list for the next drawing. Nobody getting rich with lottosych, that for sure.RJOh

Reply #6

Thomas Covenant — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:59:00 GMT

Quote from Visiondude>>>it wouldn't matter if vick was here before guru as that does not negate a pre-planned line of marketing.<<<<Quote from Guru>>>>I believe some folks can also testify that Vick and Underdog were already here on the forum before me, thus they are a reliable source of information.<<<<Actually Guru joined on Sept 2, 2003Underdog joined Nov 9, 2003Vick joined Nov 23, 2003 Is there anyone here that has been here at least a year, and is having great success with Guru's program... [ More ]

Reply #5

underdog — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:48:05 GMT

one thing is for sure is that my picks are real and so have been my winnings and losings i think i'am due to hit something bigger tonight stay tuned

Reply #4

visiondude — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:33:42 GMT

i have been wondering about this for awhile now... in the vein of keeping things honest, does vick really post his numbers pre-draw? in my observation he hasn't. seems like some of the wins were claimed after the draw. now i may be wrong to some degree as i have not been privy to every post, just that i have noticed on occasion that it has happened and wondered to myself if vick was a plant . it wouldn't matter if vick was here before guru as that does not negate a pre-planned line of mar... [ More ]

Reply #3

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:14:38 GMT

ha,This rings a bell. I read the post at the www.talkaboutgambling.com website.Indeed, this guy contacted me. He wanted to convert the soft to macintosh. I told him we were not interested, since we know people (we can trust) who can do this for us. I had the feeling he was really pushing us only to get his hands on the code. He offered to sign a non disclosure contract, but we refused this. (we can not check what someone on the other side of the planet is doing with our code).Guess he is pissed

Reply #2

paul762 — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:14:10 GMT

hi guru, here is the what i read:www.talkaboutgambling.com/group/rec.gambling.lottery/ messages/55319.html

Reply #1

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 13:17:34 GMT

Hi,What thread are

could this be conspiracy??

paul762 — Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:28:05 GMT

just read a thread on www.talkaboutgambling.com saying that someone issued lottosync a lotto challenge and they have not heard from them since and they also think there is a plant on the board talking up the softawre with all the wins!!!hope this isnt the case as i was looking forward to the keno version!!!all the bestpaul.