<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Garett&#x27;s double&#x27;s prediction theory</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/80171</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/80171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Garett&#x27;s double&#x27;s prediction theory</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Garett&#x27;s double&#x27;s prediction theory</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/80171</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/80171</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:29:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>garett1983</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>People have been asking so here it goes,1.  Take a sample any sample, preferably 100 of the past draws to determine if the next will be singles or doubles.  I usually take 10, 100, 200, and maybe 300.2.  Determine how many doubles are in that sample.  There are 270 doubles from 000 - 1000.  In theory doubles will occur in a sample 26.97% of the time.  I don&#x27;t remember the exact percentage, but divide 270 by the 1001 possible numbers.  It has to be exact.3.  Now, for a 100 number sample the theor... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/80171">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>garett1983</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

