Longest skips and the PA midday...

Reply #8

hypersoniq — Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:30:15 GMT

1998 to 2002 were slow years, I think we're in the next HIT cycle...dventually I plan on checking the 2nd and 3rd longest outs too, then 1-2-3 and 3-2-1 longest outs... to get a test of the tic-tac-toe system... but that will be MONTHS in the making.any opinions, comments, ideas?anyone using anything better for the PA pick 3

Reply #7

hypersoniq — Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:46:46 GMT

current hot pick is 2-9-0 for evening (and 3-3-3 for mid-day

Reply #6

hypersoniq — Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:44:08 GMT

Longest Out analysis, PA lottery Daily Number 1977-2004Well. what started good got worse as time went on... this system passed 2 years of back testing, but could not beat all 27 years... The system sits at a net loss, but not as bad as I have seen other systems put you out...Here is the rundown...1977 str.(771)1978 str.(086),1 box1979 1 box1980 str.(674),3 box1981 str.(300),1 box1982 -0-1983 str.(295),1 box1984 -0-1985 1 box1986 1 box1987 3 box1988 1 box1989 1 box1990 str.(991),1 box1991 str.(78... [ More ]

Reply #5

hypersoniq — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:02:47 GMT

2002 only had 3 BOX ONLY hits, that year would have been a net LOSS of $427.50your 2 year plan for 2002+2003 is still a profit, but now it's only $265.still not bad for 2 years of playing every day... I think I will wait until I am completely done for the next update

Reply #4

hypersoniq — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 22:33:23 GMT

working backwards on the pick3 evening chart I got to around Nov 2002, but have enough data for the year 2003...Total cost using the $1ST + .50 Box method... $547.50 (this is provided that you play every day... hopefully when I have all 27 year's worth of data processed there will hopefully be some indicators as to when, thus saving initial investment... this works out to spending 10.50 per week... IF the system holds true for each year (still TBD) this means you can play a $5 card for each draw... [ More ]

Reply #3

hypersoniq — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:43:02 GMT

you go back far enough in history to get the appearance of each number in each position to get a pick... I go back to day 1 for backtesting, just to see how well it worked.If you use Microsoft excel, this link describes how to set it up to count skips for you... but the LOOKUP function doesn't work right so the combo needs to be entered by hand...https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/80235.htmto set it up on paper, it would look like this...#---pos1---pos2---pos31---063----000----0152---019----011... [ More ]

Reply #2

inetgineer — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:27:29 GMT

How far back do you go to calculate the most out? Does that mean that you change your 3 digits according to an updated history?Looks cool, I am asking because it sounds very promissing and I would like to give it a Wirl in VA.

Reply #1

hypersoniq — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:05:15 GMT

BTW, as of right now, 6-3-0 is the current pick based on skips...

Longest skips and the PA midday...

hypersoniq — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:01:11 GMT

Here's an interesting bit of information... something finally passed backtesting...payoff to date summary...1. .50ST+.50BX, cost to date = $361, wins to date $660, profit $2992. $1ST+.50BX, cost to date = $541.50, wins to date $1,160, profit $618.503. $1ST+$1BX, cost to date = $722, wins to date $1,320, profit $598Apparently if you have a 1 number system, the best way to play is $1 straight and $.50 boxed...This is an accurate check on playing the MOST OUT number in each position only... keep in... [ More ]