Lottosync v1.7 bug report !

Reply #68

Guru — Tue, 11 May 2004 06:51:09 GMT

Reddog:It's funny, but always when I read your posts, it's as if that mad dog avatar is talking to me.You'll find your answer in the new thread LS1.8 feature list

Reply #67

reddog — Mon, 10 May 2004 21:58:59 GMT

Guru, we NEED a program that we can pick how many numbers from what ever. example,,,,,,, currently you have it set up for pick 6 plus bonus ball. Needs to be set up for any size game. Let the user decide what game they chose to play. Number of balls ??? Up to 80 so Keno can be included.With Pick 5 games you don't need 10 balls predicted. 8 is sufficent.Customer service needs to be improved greatly.Guru, please don't take a week to respond.

Reply #66

LANTERN — Mon, 10 May 2004 15:17:08 GMT

Oh! By the way, 10 balls might be too many for games that have 4 and 5 main balls, maybe for a game with 4 main balls 6 or 7 predicted balls might be best.And for a game with 5 main balls, 8 predicted balls might be about right, I think that the number of balls per position that the game has, would have a lot to do with this, for example: A 5-54 game might need more predicted balls or numbers than a 5-37 game.I said 5-54 because LottoSync would not work on the bonus ball for this game, so basica... [ More ]

Reply #65

LANTERN — Mon, 10 May 2004 14:57:12 GMT

I don't want to offend nobody in particular, nobody at all really, but a person has to be soft in the head so to speak, not to see that Lottosync does and can do much better than most or all of the other programs out there, people just have no patience at all.What I need is a program that I can use for lottery games that have 4 and 5 main balls, no matter if they also have bonus balls or not, because Lottosync so far does not workwith bonus balls that come out of a separate container like on the... [ More ]

Reply #64

Guru — Mon, 10 May 2004 14:13:12 GMT

Sorry Win D. Didn't see the quote.So my last mail was adressed to prometheus

Reply #63

hypersoniq — Mon, 10 May 2004 08:17:14 GMT

WIN D was quoting Prometheus...

Reply #62

Guru — Mon, 10 May 2004 07:24:38 GMT

Reaction to WIN D:Obviously windy is just throwing in big words he does not understand. I don't bother my system being an object of much debate here, but I do bother when someone tries to confuse other members by using seemingly smart terms that apply to the system as much as my dad's socks do.------------------Glad to be back at the forum after a stressy 2 months of non stop working!I've seen too many people requesting 1.8 to ignore. So we are going for it. Currently we are planning everyth... [ More ]

Reply #61

dragon — Mon, 10 May 2004 06:41:37 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by WIN D on May 08, 2004 previous quote from Prometheus 2003 . LOLStandard MemberUnited StatesMember #1370April 06, 2003110 PostsOfflineGuru, I said it in the beginning of this thread and I will say it again. There is an obvious disconnect in your system. Normally I would say that this thread was a waste of time, but as long as you are entertaining us, that means you are leaving everyone else in the world alone. Your system is childish, and never takes in to account

Reply #60

hypersoniq — Sun, 09 May 2004 13:33:25 GMT

use the good old Linux major/minor revision rule of thumb...Wait for an even major number and an odd minor number... like 2.1should be stable by then...

Reply #59

WILLSELL — Sun, 09 May 2004 07:09:59 GMT

Wow windy!So. If I can program what you have just articulated, then we may have a winner

Reply #58

WIN D — Sat, 08 May 2004 17:30:15 GMT

previous quote from Prometheus 2003 . LOLStandard MemberUnited StatesMember #1370April 06, 2003110 PostsOfflineGuru, I said it in the beginning of this thread and I will say it again. There is an obvious disconnect in your system. Normally I would say that this thread was a waste of time, but as long as you are entertaining us, that means you are leaving everyone else in the world alone. Your system is childish, and never takes in to account the natural discretizations of diffusion and any un... [ More ]

Reply #57

paul762 — Sat, 08 May 2004 11:34:13 GMT

according to the website we

Reply #56

reddog — Fri, 07 May 2004 23:04:45 GMT

Guru, you sure are quite. What's up?? Are we going to give any kind of mission statement any time soon?Now I look it this way, If I went out and bought a new car and the dealer told me it would take TWO months to fix, I would be one unhappy camper.Now it's been two months and the car dealer hasn't said what he is going to do. Give me back my money for the lemon he sold me, fix it, or replace it with one that works.Does anyone see parity in this

Reply #55

lottoshlep — Thu, 06 May 2004 07:19:40 GMT

... and by the time we're f

Reply #54

LANTERN — Thu, 06 May 2004 06:21:26 GMT

But, if he works on 1.7 it will then take longer to get 1.8 and many of us don't have any use at all for 1.7 no matter if it's fixed or not, some of us still don't and can't use it at all, but with 1.8 we will have a program that we can use, some of us can't play 6-49 lotto and other such lottery games, we have to play games that have 4 and or 5 main balls and if they have a bonus ball it is from another container so we can only use a Lottosync that is good for 4 and 5 main balls since it doesn... [ More ]

Reply #53

lottoshlep — Thu, 06 May 2004 01:14:31 GMT

Yeah but the longer you w

Reply #52

reddog — Wed, 05 May 2004 21:36:16 GMT

Well 1.7 has been a dead fish in the water for the past two months. I'm just tired of not making any money using this program like EVERY one else. So if 1.8 is going to do Keno and Cash 5 games and Lotto 6 games then I say go for it. At least that is what we have been told months ago that it would be able to do.

Reply #51

lottoshlep — Wed, 05 May 2004 20:37:50 GMT

Maybe the question should be How long are you willing to wait? No need to start a poll for this. I'll be in a major minority here so far if I vote for 1.7 ... reason being that if it doesn't take too long to de-bug then we'll have 1.7 to kick around while waiting for 1.8 (which as Guru mentioned will take a considerable amount of time to put together).

Reply #50

spock — Wed, 05 May 2004 18:29:12 GMT

1.7. didn't get off to a great start.Lets move on.

Reply #49

vick — Wed, 05 May 2004 16:53:33 GMT

I'd say go for 1.8 and hopeful

Reply #48

paul762 — Wed, 05 May 2004 12:49:47 GMT

if its possible for y

Reply #47

reddog — Wed, 05 May 2004 10:08:46 GMT

1.8 would be more useful to me than 1.7.

Reply #46

Guru — Wed, 05 May 2004 06:59:42 GMT

Lantern:I'm aware of that. Hmm. Let's see what other folks think is the best to do.

Reply #45

LANTERN — Tue, 04 May 2004 17:21:22 GMT

GuruWhy don't you trash 1.7 and instead start working on 1.8?That's what everybody wants anyway.

Reply #44

Guru — Tue, 04 May 2004 06:56:05 GMT

Hi folks,I have been extremely busy the last 2 months with a big 3d animation job. Been working 7 days a week sometimes more than 16 hours a day. Our deadline is tomorrow. After that I'm going to spend a few nice and quiet days with my family here.I will tackle the LS 1,7 bug after that.Dreamlotto.The wheel building feature will also be incorporated in LS 1,8. Programming 1,8 will take a considerable amount of time since we are gonna have to rebuild the LS structure from the ground up.

Reply #43

DreamLotto — Tue, 04 May 2004 05:26:12 GMT

Guru,I note that Lotto Synchronizer uses wheels ONLY from Dr. Illya Bluskov's book. In addition, do you have 'write a wheel' feature (like they have in Windows Lotto Pro) whereby users can feed/maintain a collection of wheels from other sources in a format compatible with LS?!Thank you

Reply #42

BobP — Mon, 03 May 2004 04:58:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by WILLSELL on May 02, 2004What is the GH software and have you made money with it?GH refers to Gail Howard's Smart Luck Advantage Plus Lottery Software. You can find a link to it here: http://www.lotto-logix.com/lottosoft.htmlFor the average to expert lottery player who has various theories on how to win and wants software with reports helpful to research their ideas the Gail Howard software is one of the best there is. While the software is no great shakes in the pre... [ More ]

Reply #41

WILLSELL — Sun, 02 May 2004 23:57:33 GMT

What is the GH software and have you made money with it

Reply #40

paul762 — Sun, 02 May 2004 14:02:19 GMT

its all looking rather sh*te and random to me, according to GH, in my lotto i should be hitting 3 numbers on average once every 13 draws with a group of 10 numbers, well i can tell you im very close to that number and i still havent hit a 3 number win, but my GH software has hit several, so at present i wont be getting too excited, still want to see keno version though, and if thats just as shizer, then its being removed from my pc.

Reply #39

reddog — Sun, 02 May 2004 12:50:31 GMT

Well, May 3 is tomorrow. I'm hoping for the best.

Reply #38

WILLSELL — Sat, 01 May 2004 22:46:52 GMT

I have some prime real estate that I will auction off in a lottery.The trick will be to guess the 6 numbers in any order.Perhaps you can use lottosick to increase your chances.One play will cost you $5 bucks.You can get a panoramic view of the land err property, if you cross the golden gate bridge.No the bridge is not for sale! I sold that to buy the lottosick software.Now once again who has made money with lottosick

Reply #37

plumbusa — Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:53:33 GMT

Looks like we got a bum deal!!Already waited a long time for an much hyped update, then wegot a faulty one at that!Sorry Guru, just disapointed to have to wait longer

Reply #36

WILLSELL — Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:09:55 GMT

OK OK who has made mucho dinero with LS

Reply #35

reddog — Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:10:43 GMT

Big OUCH

Reply #34

lottoshlep — Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:43:57 GMT

Ouch

Reply #33

Guru — Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:36:05 GMT

Some good news

Reply #32

paul762 — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:18:53 GMT

thanks guru, but wont

Reply #31

Guru — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:27:20 GMT

Paul:My research w

Reply #30

paul762 — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:50:38 GMT

guru: would it make any difference if the machine is electronic or with balls eg. would lottosync be better at predicting pseudo randomness or ball and machine randomness

Reply #29

lottoshlep — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:35:09 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #28

Guru — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:58:44 GMT

Paul:The above the

Reply #27

Guru — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:51:11 GMT

Possible explanation for (Vick's) keno succes:Why does LottoSynchronizer seem to pick better numbers for keno than for lotto ?Well, it doesn't, but in keno there is one advantage that may have a big impact on the results.You could see keno as a lottogame where multiple draws are being drawn at once. (more than 6 numbers are picked per draw)This means that the expected random progress in keno has a much better chance of actually being drawn in the next kenodraw and not the second next or dventual... [ More ]

Reply #26

vick — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:03:45 GMT

Here in Ontario we

Reply #25

lottoshlep — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:32:12 GMT

Couldn't hurt to try at least

Reply #24

paul762 — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:30:58 GMT

our keno is called rapido a

Reply #23

lottoshlep — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:15:07 GMT

Hey Vick, that sounds good

Reply #22

vick — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:01:10 GMT

Just looking at my Keno, fr

Reply #21

lottosyncman — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:16:32 GMT

recouped in the first month $800 have been winning consistently 3 numbers but not last draw hit a dud

Reply #20

WILLSELL — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:11:21 GMT

I guess knowone has cashed any tickets judging from the responses.Just curious how long do you oners think it will take to recoup the cost of the software

Reply #19

vick — Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:11:31 GMT

Yes email us when the fix i

Reply #18

Irvin — Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:39:16 GMT

Guru,Can you please let us know when the bugs are ironed out and then I'll send you my info for the updated version.Thanks,Irvin......I'm still running 1.6

Reply #17

reddog — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:58:21 GMT

Mine also has gone no higher than 36 on a the 49 LotoSouth Lotto.

Reply #16

lottosyncman — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:36:55 GMT

guru how can your copy tested be so different from the ones you sent us??? and what was your winning results like in your tests before you released 1.7??? thanks and great work

Reply #15

lottosyncman — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:33:37 GMT

well so far with this system the results havent been to bad i have landed 3 numbers 2out of 4 times played lucky? maybe only time will tell if after the next couple draws i will have a clearer evaluation

Reply #14

WILLSELL — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:14:45 GMT

Ok we have all been around the bush on this software. So, the proof is in the pudding How about posting some of the winnings from this system

Reply #13

lottosyncman — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:28:07 GMT

yes same here on the probability table

Reply #12

EXCALIBUR — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:15:00 GMT

I just took a look at my numbers and yes you are all rightI got too many low numbers and no high numbers also and on the probability scale the few winning numbers seem to be coming out on the far right 20% and on the far left 50%and some-times around the middle 35%, but mostly on the far right 20%.What about you all, got do you get

Reply #11

Guru — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:35:30 GMT

whoosh.something seems to have gone very wrong with the final 1.7. Did some tests and also got way too many low numbers with the version supplied to our customers. My last testing version seems to perform ok. (strange, they should be identical ??!!??). Something must have slipped from my attention.Well, I'm going to find out and supply you all with a patch to fix it.

Reply #10

lottosyncman — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:56:48 GMT

yeah but my low numbers are winning me money he! he

Reply #9

vick — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:39:35 GMT

yes it's picking WAY to many LOW numbers

Reply #8

lottoshlep — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:40:00 GMT

Hey synch players, a couple of

Reply #7

spock — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 08:52:47 GMT

I tried an experiment changed from 6/42 Irish lotto to UK 6/49 to see if LS would pick higher numbers well 11 hours later the numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,7,9,19,23,30.now on the Irish low numbers looked due that is not the case on uk lotto.Something is very wrong withLS1.7.

Reply #6

vick — Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:32:51 GMT

spock, hehehe, i have 2 computers, and their both pretty fast takes about 1.5 to 2 days to run em all, but i' concentrating on keno more these days, waiting for next keno version to come out

Reply #5

spock — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:04:00 GMT

Vick how do you get time to do all them runs is the computer ever off..

Reply #4

spock — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:02:11 GMT

Well tonight 6/42 lotto running 40000 samples one number right again? One of the numbers was above 32.which probably didn't help if it wont pick above 32.Low numbers due but it picked balls in 1 to 10 range in draw it was 14 to 20 range.

Reply #3

lottoshlep — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 18:47:29 GMT

Same here, predominantly low preds in 01s and 10s so far. Often 2 decades missing, one of the last sets had 3 decades missing which can happen but is very rare. Sent some latest examples via PM.

Reply #2

vick — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:31:02 GMT

i've never noticed that in 649 games, but i have notice this in 649 games =there seems to be ALOT more numbers falling under 25 !!! here's some examples =Draw 1=sample = 50000 1 2 3 5 7 15 16 17 19 43 = 9 numbers below 25sample = 25000 1 2 5 6 8 10 16 18 24 41 = 9 numbers below 25sample = 40000 1 2 4 7 16 18 21 27 40 48 = 8 numbers below 25sample = 20000 2 3 5 6 14 15 16 17 29 47 = 8 numbers below 25sample = 30000 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 16 20 35 = 9 numbers below 25sample = 12000 1 2 3 5 18 22 26... [ More ]

Reply #1

spock — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:20:51 GMT

same here 32 highest number picked

Lottosync v1.7 bug report !

Guru — Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:17:38 GMT

Hi,I received an email from a user that was unable to get numbers higher than aprox. 32 in his predictions.If anyone notices this behaviour too, please report it in this thread or send me an email.I suspect there may be a bug left in the code that in some occasions kicks in and ignores higher numbers. (although it never showed up in my original testruns)I'll have a close look at the code next week to see where this comes from.