Ill Little Lotto

Reply #3

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:53:34 GMT

Sounds to me like you are s

Reply #2

qutgnt — Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:00:46 GMT

I know that they sacrificed the 4 out of 5 prize to accomodate the 2 out of five prize. To me the 3 out of five prize was basically left the same as you are getting double your money but your odds were sliced in half on getting 3 out of 5. I just wish that they would raise the 4 out of 5 back to at least 200. In this jackpot run the 4 out of 5 was hit by probably 1000 people. So then the jackpot would only be 1.4 million tonite, what is the difference. I am just saying they didnt need to fol... [ More ]

Reply #1

Rick G — Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:56:08 GMT

Gutgnt,I agree with you, they have sacrificed the 4 of 5 payout to accommodate the 2 of 5 and 3 of 5 payouts. BUT the bottom line tonight is that you have 575,000 to 1 odds of winning 1.5 million.I wasn't going to play, but have found myself doing so. My lottery agent says sales have vastly improved with the changes.And there's usually only one winner...but with tonight's jackpot I would expect a few winners to be sharing that prize since it's three times more than the odds.... [ More ]

Ill Little Lotto

qutgnt — Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:23:16 GMT

The jackpot hasnt been hit in a while and we now have a huge jackpot. I am not a fan of this game though as it used to be refresing to have a way to go after a 20-60k win a day and have a realistic shot at winning it. Now if you hit four out of five your are really screwed. They should increase that prize to 250 bucks and they would stil have a jackpot at this point that would be over a million. And how bout instead of trying to hoodwink the players by changing the game and leading the playe... [ More ]