<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Betting Planner</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/84264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Betting Planner</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/193565</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/193565</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 08:41:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bilhar</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In lottery bets you will more than regain your losses if you ever win,  compound bets are foolish with such odds,    This system was created for Black Jack,  where it works, if they let you stay on the table.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bilhar</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/192805</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/192805</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 19:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>casual gamblers would rather buy a few extra tickets with the money saved on any system... Unless of course you collect systems... I don&#x27;t... I&#x27;ll passI agree with Todd, Jackpot games are too stacked against you to chase losses.Also added to the fact that you don&#x27;t actually give out numbers to play... what exactly are you charging for</p>]]></description>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/191981</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/191981</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2004 02:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TuSuerte</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ToddThanks for your note. It is our opinion that a  professional gambler  knows the risks that are present when using a progression method in any game, but it is also a fact that a  professional gambler  frequently wins, thus this system is a criteria for programming earnings.Regards,TuSuerte.com</p>]]></description>
			<category>TuSuerte</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/191594</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264/191594</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please let us know when the page is translated to english.  You should also do the money management to break even playing Pick-5 and Pick-6 assuming an average return for a 3# win.  BobP</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Betting Planner</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/84264</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MikeK</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear TuSuerte,I just received an email from you with the same contents: That smeels like  Severe Push of Advertisemnt Mega-Garbage  to me, or is it SPAM?Good Luck</p>]]></description>
			<category>MikeK</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

