Lottosynchronizer 1.6

Reply #18

paul762 — Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:11:59 GMT

ive been using 490 sample v1.6 with no luck as of yet

Reply #17

stoopendaal — Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:40:12 GMT

Yes,Version 1.6.

Reply #16

vick — Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:54:46 GMT

550 samples? that's the old version 1.6 your using stoopendaal

Reply #15

stoopendaal — Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:21:07 GMT

3 from 6 n

Reply #14

paul762 — Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:03:22 GMT

well lottosync fails to del

Reply #13

stoopendaal — Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:06:17 GMT

apagogeas,here an url with the results of the dutch lotto : http://www.winnu.nl/LOTTO.txtThe most recent draw - 3 april 2004 - is at the top of the file...

Reply #12

stoopendaal — Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:56:27 GMT

apagogeas,here the link for the dutch lotto..... http://www.lotto.nl

Reply #11

lottoarchitect — Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:13:28 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #10

paul762 — Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:47:31 GMT

only 1 number again last night on lotto plus i have played 8 numbers for the last 50 keno draws and only managed a maximum of 4 numbers, starting to worry a little about this.

Reply #9

spock — Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:08:13 GMT

I do recall Guru saying the more samples the better.(i think he was taking about1.7.)But then some one on this forum said they got good results from lower samples 300 with 1.6. as i remember? so which is it? until this sample question is sorted i think LS will not live up to hype..

Reply #8

paul762 — Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:28:07 GMT

when i hit 5/7 i played multiple samples of 27 after 150 eg. 162 was my first sample 189 was my second sample, 216 my third, after i had finished, my last sample was 1998 and out of all the tickets only 1 line had the 5 numbers. when i used that same sample for the next draw it produced 0, so my thoughts are now stick with the one sample and play, i think guru said there were certain hotspots in the lottery where lottosync will perform best, but i also think this is from sticking to one sample.

Reply #7

spock — Tue, 06 Apr 2004 08:41:34 GMT

He did but i think he was referring to LS1.7. at the time? I have tried using varied samples 500,600,700, etc plus using numbers on next draw still get 2 numbers right.Must be trying to hard.

Reply #6

paul762 — Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:18:06 GMT

i am playing v1.6 using the predicted numbers in the next draw also, i am using bluskov system#115 which guarantees 3x4 if 6 from 10 in 5 lines at total cost of 10 to play. im sure guru said to play lottosync predictions in the next draw also, i cant remember.good luck all

Reply #5

spock — Mon, 05 Apr 2004 08:46:09 GMT

I keep getting 2 numbers right using 1.6. so i think i will give it a rest till 1.7. is put right

Reply #4

BobP — Mon, 05 Apr 2004 02:26:08 GMT

If the cost of the included Lottosync wheel is keeping you from playing, here is my 10 number wheel in 10 lines that guarantees 3if3, 4-3if4, 4if5+8-3if5 and 6-4if6+4-3if6 prizes with an 84% chance of 5if6. 1 2 3 5 7 8 1 2 4 5 7 9 1 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 5 6 7 10 1 3 4 5 6 9 1 3 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 6 7 9 2 3 5 8 9 10 3 4 6 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 10If 10 lines is beyond budget, the following three lines will guarantee 2-3if5 and 4if6+2-3if6 with a 97% chance of 3if4. 1... [ More ]

Reply #3

lottosyncman — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 17:39:23 GMT

i'am trying version 1.7 on this next draw as my results seemed better than average i sure wish the bias toward low numbers didnt exist as it affects the final outcome

Reply #2

RJOh — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:50:10 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #1

paul762 — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 14:59:01 GMT

1+bonus on uk lotto last night 6/49. lottosync numbers were: 2-5-6-9-10-13-19-43-44-47drawing numbers were : 3-9-12-28-29-38-(5

Lottosynchronizer 1.6

stoopendaal — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 14:19:51 GMT

Again a 4 out of 10