Reply #1

Clipper — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:34:42 GMT

Didnt work like I expected it....but at least it was less then 6 in the 2nd. Just did a 2 digit repeat that I wasnt able to see coming :( At least was right on the 8 and 9 being eliminated.The even entry I was seeing in my charts must have been the 2 digit repeat instead of 0 digit repeat.

SC Evening 4-16-2004

Clipper — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:17:16 GMT

Been looking at the Combined Database again. Have ruled out digits 7-8-9 and with a No Digit repeat of the 667.....the 6 would be included.Positional charts are indicating something less then 6 in the 1st, less then 6 in the 2nd and less the 7 in the 3rd.Either 0-1-4-5 in the 1st, 0-1-4-5 in the 2nd with 3rd position unclear. With as few digits used cant rule out possibility of a Double although there is no clear indication a Double will play.Figure the 1 is a sure number....probably the 2 an... [ More ]