Powerball no-repeat combination base

Reply #2

waynr — Mon, 03 May 2004 00:31:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on May 02, 2004 <FONT color=green size=2>waynr,<FONT color=#008000 size=2>How do you define range? Range in other posts have been defined as the different between the lowest and the highest numbers in a combination and you defined a wide range as 1-21 and a narrow range as 3-48. The actual range of PB combinations in the last 164 drawings, according to the traditional definition has been 8-52 with less than 5% in the 1-21 range.<FONT color=#008000 size=2>RJOhRJ... [ More ]

Reply #1

RJOh — Sun, 02 May 2004 23:26:59 GMT

waynr,How do you define range? Range in other posts have been defined as the different between the lowest and the highest numbers in a combination and you defined a wide range as 1-21 and a narrow range as 3-48. The actual range of PB combinations in the last 164 drawings, according to the traditional definition has been 8-52 with less than 5% in the 1-21 range.RJOh

Powerball no-repeat combination base

waynr — Sun, 02 May 2004 16:48:40 GMT

Can everyone here at least agree that to make a prediction based on probability rather than whim or dogma there has to be input of some sort? Does it square with logic that the more credible the input then the more credible the predictive results will be? In lottery error is easy in both hacking and gambling, the two most important aspects - IMHO. Grasping ever bigger pictures of the true nature of the game seems to get harder with each picture. Things get harder to explain and harder to follow.... [ More ]