Sequentials, using 0

Reply #2

garyo1954 — Wed, 05 May 2004 05:41:28 GMT

Thanks! I have been searching, reading, and trying to reconstruct quite a bit of what I never knew about this game. I'll ask plenty of questions. There appears to be so much more data available and so many more people interested in deciphering the phenomena than a decade ago. Some of these ideas are completely new to me so Ill be hanging out to learn more. Hope it helps us all win more.Thanks again!G

Reply #1

cadl — Wed, 05 May 2004 04:44:35 GMT

since the randoms represent 2/3 of the total combinations (4 out of 6) the data you provide doesn't show any distinct advantage or disadvantage of one type over another (65% randoms in the sample you mention). there are 10 of these consecutive combos (890, 901, 012, etc.) and they seem to occur about one in every 18 draws in tx the last time i checked. actually they are a good play now in the night game--if you consider its draws independent of the day game--59 draws since there last occuran... [ More ]

Sequentials, using 0

garyo1954 — Wed, 05 May 2004 02:42:54 GMT

After going through the Texas Pick 3 history looking for sequentials, meaning consecutive numbers that hit in the same drawing, I began to wonder if using zero as the upper limit and as the lower limit would not diminish the results.AS I see it, there are three types of sequentials, ascending (0-1-2), descending (2-1-0), and random (1-0-2).Ascending sequentials occur only 31 times in 3287 draws. Descending sequentials occur 28 times in 3287. Random sequentials occur 108 in 3287 draws, using zero... [ More ]