<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Analysis SC Combined Doubles/Repeat/No R</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/87339</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/87339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Analysis SC Combined Doubles/Repeat/No R</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Analysis SC Combined Doubles/Repeat/No R</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/87339</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/87339</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 19:22:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Clipper</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just completed an analysis for the SC Combined database I have here for the Doubles/Repeat/No Repeat happenings.In the SC Combined database I have that goes back to 10-1-2003, there doesnt seem to be a strong balance leaning one way or the other.  This might be different according to Individual database standings, however, by the Combined database play there was a 69-62 ration with more Double games coming from when there is a Repeat digit of previous game.If anything, there is a stronger possib... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/87339">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Clipper</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

