Some stupid eBay system I purchased...

Reply #34

BobP — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 05:44:16 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ccbrown33 on June 12, 2004Thanks....I've used Windows Lotto Pro 2003 but no luck with it... I've got to come up with some strategies for picking numbers... Iike I ask I'm new at this... CarrieThe old Windows Lotto Pro broke the numbers into Hot, Cold, Due, and Prior Draw and picked randomly from those fields based on the percentages of winning numbers coming from those fields in the game's history.For a lotto software author this was rather brillant as everyone got so... [ More ]

Reply #33

Darron L. Smith — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:31:46 GMT

windows lotto pro isnt that great... I mean it is pretty good for keeping track of stats and hot and cold numbers but thats as far as the program has ever worked for me. It never really predicted a winner. The trick in picking the right numbers is to pick some numbers that no one else is using. If everyone just simply started up a lottery program and wheeled numbers im sure there would be hundreds playing the same numbers. thats why systems which are solely on paper are best. everyone has a diff... [ More ]

Reply #32

ccbrown33 — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:33:07 GMT

Thanks....I've used Windows Lotto Pro 2003 but no luck with it... I've got to come up with some strategies for picking numbers... Iike I ask I'm new at this... Carrie

Reply #31

Darron L. Smith — Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:13:57 GMT

keep in mind even if you do choose a system, you ultimately decide what numbers you play in the draw. If something is giving you a gut feeling or a certain number stands out to you, then you should probably play that number or combination. systems can only get you so far, but you have to make the step. thanks

Reply #30

ccbrown33 — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:58:36 GMT

Darron, Thanks I'll give your brother's system a try.... I've tried several system and so far no luck.... I'm new at this, so I'm trying to find something that works...Carrie

Reply #29

Darron L. Smith — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:42:34 GMT

yes, please do. thanks.

Reply #28

vick — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:18:52 GMT

I tried your brothers system on my Keno 10/70 and find it works better than in my 649 lotto !!! i'll keep you posted

Reply #27

Darron L. Smith — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:30:07 GMT

nope, he does not do pick 3 or pick 4. nor does he do pick 10. you are correct, he only does 'lotto' type games.

Reply #26

Sandy K — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:12:34 GMT

So Darron, does your brother have a Pick3 or Pick4 system or am I missing something? I downloaded it and it seems to be geared toward the lotto type of lottery.

Reply #25

Darron L. Smith — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:12:39 GMT

I think lottery software can be beneficial to some extent. FAR more than such a lottery system which is only on paper. Reason is you can use it to keep track of various stats without doing a lot of calculations immediately. Anyone can see a benefit in this, even the most professional player.As far as 'Paid' Lottery systems go, I dont think youll find anything new in them at the moment. The market is saturated with such garbage that it seems everyone is copying off eachother. Take 'Ken Silvers' f... [ More ]

Reply #24

hypersoniq — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:09:15 GMT

there would be immediate tangible benefits to an LP subscription as Todd is describing it... but for the other stuff, why pay for what you can do yourself (with roughly the same results) for free? Sure, I bought Excel, but it has other uses... Lottery history analysis was an afterthought...It just seems that the majority of software for lottery has less of a service provider-customer relationship and more like predator-prey... easily witnessed on e-bay

Reply #23

BobP — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 03:10:12 GMT

I don't believe in lottery systems with a price tag... not even if it was me turning the profit... Just to play around with the concept: Is there any point in the flow of lottery information from source to you it would be worth paying for? Buy a software, a book, a magazine subscription, or should all authors put lottery off the radar as a topic? What about when Lotterypost offers subscription upgrades? Me, I don't mind paying to learn something new lottery wise, trouble is I rarely do anymor... [ More ]

Reply #22

hypersoniq — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:29:00 GMT

BobP...

Reply #21

Darron L. Smith — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:43:32 GMT

your completely right Bob. I agree with you 100%. I am pretty sure that many people who actually buy the systems do not keep track of the losses because there is probably a lot of them and the wins motivate them to play more. A professional lottery player might do that though.I personally think the fact that lottery systems are for sale just says that people are trying to cash in on them just for profits. It has nothing at all to do with whether they care about making people win or helping peopl... [ More ]

Reply #20

BobP — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:13:15 GMT

I am beginning to wonder how much of the success of a system in the buyer's mind is dependent on the promotion that sold it? Take a simple system like adding and subtracting a 1 from each digit of the prior draw, then a 2, then a 3, then 1-2 and 2-1, then 1-2-3 and 3-2-1. A simple system, yet we've all seen draws where this would have been a source of the winning number.Post such a system here in a matter of fact and it gets little notice, not something people are going to put money on, yet mak... [ More ]

Reply #19

Darron L. Smith — Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:46:52 GMT

for pick 3 try sal's 'stack' system. not too sure about the inner workings of it, but i think it has been getting many hits. mabe you should try it out.

Reply #18

Darryl — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:13:20 GMT

I would like to say thanks to most of you, I have been looking in at Lotterypost for some time and have been looking for a better system for Pick three. I had purchased the Lottery Director System a number of years ago and have played and tinkered with the filters but have never been consistent with winning the Pick Three. I guess I am looking for a better system to play say $5.00 to $20.00 per day. I have looked at Sums,Odd even, Positional movements,deltas etc etc and have yet to come up with... [ More ]

Reply #17

Darron L. Smith — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:39:03 GMT

good luck

Reply #16

vick — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:24:51 GMT

ok i see now, it has promise,

Reply #15

Darron L. Smith — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:37:40 GMT

yes, thats exactly what I meant. If the calculated ball's are not in order, do not play the system.

Reply #14

vick — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:45:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Darron L. Smith on June 11, 2004My brothers system will ONLY work when all the ball's calculated are in order. When its in order the chances the numbers will hit are very high. This occurance happens mabe twice a year. I will surely pass your suggestions to him. Thanks again.you mean when the calulated balls are in numerical order ie, after ball 1 calulation is say = 3, ball 2 = 10 etc BUT if ball 2 was say lower than ball 1 say ball2 = 1, then it has a low chance of... [ More ]

Reply #13

Darron L. Smith — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:45:30 GMT

Yes, I HATE ambiguous systems. If people actually hit any money with these systems, then it has to be the luck of god, not science.

Reply #12

MrSteel01 — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:23:27 GMT

try gail howard what do expect 4 $ 20 my was sent for nothing no reply or what did you try it or not? It supose to give you humbers but wher do they come from the sky or a generatd group or a specific area? Sums, reapeating sets, groups or columns

Reply #11

Darron L. Smith — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:54:48 GMT

ok, he said that the adjustment process is somewhat difficult and he has never been able to nail it down that often. It is the core of the system and takes quite some time to master.This is only one of the systems he uses, I think on the bottom of the second page he gives a glympse of another system which makes use of pi as a number in relation to the lottery drawing. This method is so complex even I could not understand it. But it does work sometimes.thanks again

Reply #10

Darron L. Smith — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:40:10 GMT

thanks BobP! nope I do not have professor Jones book. I was angry at first, but now I'm not because I see that he is a lowlife for making some outrageous claim he was featured in Dateline NBC and those 5 business mags. Leads me to believe hes just a 12 year old or just plain not that smart.My brothers system will ONLY work when all the ball's calculated are in order. When its in order the chances the numbers will hit are very high. This occurance happens mabe twice a year. I will surely pass you... [ More ]

Reply #9

BobP — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:23:40 GMT

The Lotto Guy ebook pretty much paraphrases (badly) the cheaper Professor Jones book (The Basics of Lotto/Lottery ISBM 0-940685-18-3) you can find used for a couple of bucks on Amazon. I think the nonsense about Quick Picks and needing to play every draw to get a refund was original. I did need to copy and paste the link into the address bar to get the download. If you have the Jones book you've already seen it . . .

Reply #8

vick — Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:55:49 GMT

Darron it's a complex system, especially when making different columns, for instance my 6/49 lotto, so i use 1- 8 for 1st column etc to 49.some numbers end up being greater then the maximum ball, ie greater than my 49 example 52 etc.the triangles seem simple enough, until he starts talking about+ or -1 if the triangle diagram is even or not? or pointed to the left? other than that it seems interesting, i tried it and only 1 number hit BUT 4 were off by only 1 !!!!!!!can u ask your brother about... [ More ]

Reply #7

Darron L. Smith — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:57:20 GMT

ok, this is the link to the paper copy which I scanned in from my brother's system. This system is FREE and open to suggestion like I said. Also, I should remind you that the self extracting zip file is in fact about 4 mb because it is a high quality scan so people can read it properly. If anyone would be willing to type up the information, that would also be helpful as well. The method takes a more mathematical approach to the lottery rather than statistical means. I would guess its worth a rea... [ More ]

Reply #6

reddog — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:40:29 GMT

I will be looking forward to it. Thanks for your team contribution.

Reply #5

Darron L. Smith — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:47 GMT

on a side note, I will be putting up a lottery system which was created and founded by my brother who is an avid lottery player unlike myself. I am scanning his original writing now, and will put up the link to it later in the day. It is completely free and open to suggestion. Doesn't guarantee any 'winnings' per se, but he has won over 3 grand when he has used it. Unlike other lottery systems, this one does not require you to play every single drawing, in fact you can by using this system tell... [ More ]

Reply #4

Darron L. Smith — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:07:43 GMT

yea, thats what i figured. however, he made that assumption based on the fact that many winners in the past who have chosen quick picks and won come from certain states. In other words, just because there has not been a jackpot winner from x states, it is safe to assume that there will never be such a one from those states. Therefore, its all the work of some 'mystical chip' which predetermines the winner ahead of time. What total rubbish. I am working on filing a false advertising claim against... [ More ]

Reply #3

Darron L. Smith — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:03:02 GMT

thanks, well I get a broken link if i click on it. guess it works for some people

Reply #2

Todd — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:03:02 GMT

By the way, the guy who wrote the e-book is wrong about Quick Picks. He indicates that Quick Picks are generated by a shared computer chip among all lottery machines. This is not true. Each lottery machine generates its own random numbers.

Reply #1

Todd — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:00:22 GMT

Darron,It works fine if you click the link.Welcome to Lottery Post, sorry about your wasted purchase.

Some stupid eBay system I purchased...

Darron L. Smith — Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:33:05 GMT

Hi! Just like to say that I am a long time reader and first time poster on this website forum, and glad to be here. For all those wanting to win the lottery with some outrageous system which claims it will win 100% of the time, I have a PURCHASED system (which costs $20) for you that is available from me FREE of CHARGE! Why? Because I want all the people who are even remotely thinking of buying some type of system to see how stupid the systems actually are and that there is nothing really in the... [ More ]