Lottery Director slightly ahead!!

Reply #32

RJOh — Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:44:39 GMT

UCI1,Glad I could help, but everything on your charts agreed with what I have. I've just written some routines to search my files and I'll use your charts to check my data. Your charts should come in handy for any SuperLotto player that doesn't track the drawings. Good luck to you.RJOh

Reply #31

vanm — Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:20:22 GMT

I had a friend who did something like this with the drawings. The next step is to graph each position. It came out a positive peak of a sine wave sine wave. It kind of give you a range of nbrs that drew most in each position . You can position wheel these nbrs.

Reply #30

UCI1 — Sat, 10 Jul 2004 04:33:12 GMT

RJOh,I just wanted to thank you for your response, it got me to go back over my files and find some mistakes and errors that I had made. I like it when other people post their views, it helps me think and and see things that I have previously missed plus, it sparks new ideas.I have a chart that I have just started working with, it can be viewed at http://psl.4mg.com . I updated some of the information thanks to you helping me see some flaws.Thanks again,UCI1

Reply #29

UCI1 — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:47:57 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #28

RJOh — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:23:59 GMT

UCI1,My SuperLotto file shows it(4 numbers in previous 3 drawings) has happen a total of 41 time which includes the 12 times it happen in the previous 2 drawings. It also show that on 08/03/02 the number 10 finally hit after 61 no-shows.RJOh

Reply #27

Guru — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:20:59 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on July 09, 2004GURU,Let say you invented a system where you took the numbers of the last three drawings and used them to pick combinations for the next drawing. In the last Ohio Super Lotto drawing, you would have won the $17M jackpot. 415 07/07/04 08 11 27 31 35 38 +32414 07/03/04 01 31 32 35 38 48 +26413 06/30/04 05 08 27 37 41 42 +07412 06/26/04 02 11 25 27 30 47 +15Does this mean the system is valid??? NO absolutely not, but wh... [ More ]

Reply #26

UCI1 — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:41:57 GMT

Starting at drawing 392 to 415, 24 drawings there were only 6 that had 4 or more numbers out of the last 3 drawings.Draw 395 4#'s out of draws 394, 393, 392 = 19#'sDraw 403 4#'s out of draws 402, 401, 400 = 19#'sDraw 405 4#'s out of draws 404, 403, 402 = 18#'sDraw 407 6#'s out of draws 406, 405, 404 = 20#'sDraw 410 4#'s out of draws 409, 408, 407 = 18#'sDraw 415 7#'s out of draws 414, 413, 412 = 20#'sI try to follow such activity and getting 4#'s out of the last 3 drawings happens about 25% of t... [ More ]

Reply #25

LANTERN — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 18:49:48 GMT

RJOhIt might mean that if it did, then it might again, it also means that if you had seen it the first time and thought that it might again and had been wheeling (Full wheel) all 18 numbers for every draw there-after and playing them, you would had won the big-one.But not really, because the bonus ball was not there the second time.And even if it had been, it might not have been wheeled into the proper position. But with a partial wheel (And maybe some filters) you might had made some money.

Reply #24

Guru — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:25:37 GMT

RJOH:This is an example of extreme curve fitting !Afterwards it is easy to find a so called system that won along the way albeit ridiculous, but the future is something different I'm afraid. That's where uncertainty kicks in.When you hear a story in the news that someone survived crossing the ocean on a plank, this does not mean we all have to start travelling that way. Right ? Ok, it happened, the guy survived, but for ship designers and builders it is an isolated case without any value.If yo... [ More ]

Reply #23

RJOh — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:13:58 GMT

That means there are a lot of non-valid systems out there that have already seen their best days and when someone tells you they won a jackpot using a certain systems, it doesn't mean much but it is interesting.RJOh

Reply #22

LANTERN — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:43:35 GMT

That is one of the big reasons why filters and wheels are used, because they only have to work right once to get the big-one and untill then you can win smaller prices.It all has to do with the statistics of the game.

Reply #21

RJOh — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:33:47 GMT

GURU,Let say you invented a system where you took the numbers of the last three drawings and used them to pick combinations for the next drawing. In the last Ohio Super Lotto drawing, you would have won the $17M jackpot. 415 07/07/04 08 11 27 31 35 38 +32414 07/03/04 01 31 32 35 38 48 +26413 06/30/04 05 08 27 37 41 42 +07412 06/26/04 02 11 25 27 30 47 +15Does this mean the system is valid??? NO absolutely not, but who cares, the system only have to work once and yo... [ More ]

Reply #20

Guru — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 11:08:37 GMT

Paul:It was just an example.

Reply #19

paul762 — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:24:03 GMT

GURU, does this mean V1.8 averages 3 from 9 every 5 draws now and not every 3 as previously posted? or was that just an example

Reply #18

Guru — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:37:28 GMT

The law of large numbers !often people rave over systems or techniques that have short term success. The fact is that we should look a lot further than that. Let's say I invented a system where we take the numbers of the last draw and multiply the odd numbers by 2 and divide the even by 2 to obtain the numbers to be drawn next. Or a system where I paint numbers on a wall, and throw darts at the numbers blindfolded in order to know what will be drawn next. (I've seen people enthousiastic abou... [ More ]

Reply #17

BobP — Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:22:15 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on July 08, 2004LANTERN - I'm giong to see how the new lottosync V1.8 performs, and if it's no better than my own selections I'll forget about lotto software. got 3 from 6 last night + 4 from 7 two nights before, this from the minimum 6 + 7 numbers, GH=2 numbers and LD=2 numbers, they also hit 1 number each the two nights before, these were using 8 numbers not 6 + 7.good luck.Forget Gail Howard predictions. Using about 200 past draws F3 set F4 clear V chart t... [ More ]

Reply #16

LANTERN — Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:48:09 GMT

Yes, but working with software teaches us a few things, that we might not have thought about otherwise and with software you can do some things that you can't without it, software can give you many ideas that you can start with and you can take it from there.Also as Pick-4 master says, proper use of the software is very important, it might not give you the right numbers by itself, but with help from you, it might or at least give you some help that you need, that together with something else mig... [ More ]

Reply #15

paul762 — Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:21:42 GMT

LANTERN - I'm giong to see how the new lottosync V1.8 performs, and if it's no better than my own selections I'll forget about lotto software. got 3 from 6 last night + 4 from 7 two nights before, this from the minimum 6 + 7 numbers, GH=2 numbers and LD=2 numbers, they also hit 1 number each the two nights before, these were using 8 numbers not 6 + 7.good luck.

Reply #14

LANTERN — Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:45:11 GMT

Paul is right, there is nothing better than your mind.

Reply #13

ify911 — Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:56:54 GMT

You need to leave the lotto director and try using lotto buster. i down the free trial last night . i am very impress with the software . it gives your good reads on the numbers. cold numbers, hot number , partern number , it even gives a mixed of cool,hot and partern numbers (super pick) i general will not play the all the numbers given in the cold, hot , partern, . i pick my numbers based off them.you can pick hot, cold, pattern Numbers in evens, odds, high low numbersi am play for the m... [ More ]

Reply #12

lottoshlep — Wed, 07 Jul 2004 01:23:59 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #11

BobP — Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:43:43 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottoshlep on July 06, 2004Quote: Originally posted by BobP on July 04, 2004If anyone knows of any worthwhile lottery software not on this list please name it and post its link here, no ads please. Thanks BobPLottoStatisticsXL LottoSelectorXL by Nick Koutras , http://www.geocities.com/socratiou/index.htmIt's free ... I didn't see it on your list BobIt's there between Lotto Sorcerer and Lotto Stat. BobPhttp://www.lotto-logix.com/lottosoft.html

Reply #10

lottoshlep — Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:20:19 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on July 04, 2004If anyone knows of any worthwhile lottery software not on this list please name it and post its link here, no ads please. Thanks BobPLottoStatisticsXL LottoSelectorXL by Nick Koutras , http://www.geocities.com/socratiou/index.htmIt's free ... I didn't see it on your list Bob

Reply #9

paul762 — Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:25:47 GMT

it makes me laugh really as my own method beats the averages of both these programs together, and its not even on a computer!!brains- you gotta love em

Reply #8

MikeK — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:42 GMT

I would be interesting to see.......a sample selection of Lottery Director and Gail Howard, used in this comparison ...how much was won by the programs.Is that data available?Good Luck

Reply #7

paul762 — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 13:46:12 GMT

decision was based on both programs auto picks facility using the same amount of history for both.

Reply #6

Irvin — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:02:36 GMT

Oneday,I agree with you. lotto-logix is excellent.

Reply #5

ONEDAY — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 05:11:12 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on July 04, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Kristin on July 04, 2004I never heard of that program before, I have always used Gail Howard. I will have to check it out, have you won any thing recently by using this program? Lottery Director is a good program and the demo is fully functional and free. From people I've talked to, you tend to like or go with Lottery Director or Gail Howard depending on which you tried first. Lottery Director has more stuff and you f... [ More ]

Reply #4

Kristin — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 04:10:43 GMT

Thanks, I am always worried about any program I download. I have heard and read a lot of people win 3 or 4 numbers several times using the program. I tried downloading it, nothing came up though. I purchased Gail's book, but not the program. I never won very much using her book, but I wonder if her program works better? Has anyone won with it

Reply #3

BobP — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 03:52:18 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Kristin on July 04, 2004 I never heard of that program before, I have always used Gail Howard. I will have to check it out, have you won any thing recently by using this program? Lottery Director is a good program and the demo is fully functional and free. From people I've talked to, you tend to like or go with Lottery Director or Gail Howard depending on which you tried first. Lottery Director has more stuff and you find more the deeper you dig, but Gail Howard is... [ More ]

Reply #2

MikeK — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 03:14:23 GMT

What's Gail Howard's Lottery Post Id, do you know?Good Luck

Reply #1

Kristin — Mon, 05 Jul 2004 02:33:54 GMT

I never heard of that program before, I have always used Gail Howard. I will have to check it out, have you won any thing recently by using this program

Lottery Director slightly ahead!!

paul762 — Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:33:14 GMT

I have found lottery director to be outperforming gail howard software, even when using just the minimum amount of numbers for the draw,anyone else finding this also