Lottoarchitect and Lottosync

Reply #12

vick — Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:14:56 GMT

no i don't use ver 1.7 anymore just for those limitations you mentioned, BIG LIMITATIONS ie.1. can input 7 numbers instead of 202. input output numbers don't go upto 703. only 10 numbers outputed, i would like to see upto 20, ie variables outputs upto 20, like say 6 or 8 or 16 or 20 etc etcwaiting for 1.8 to hopefully fix these problemsi'm experimenting with other keno methods at the moment, just testing etc

Reply #11

Raziel — Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:14:55 GMT

VickI have read the archives on your dealings with Keno and your innovative ways of coming up with Keno numbers.......especially when all you can enter is only 6 or 7 numbers from the 20 drawn. How di you choose which numbers to use.I understand Marco(Guru) mentioning that 1.8 will allow us to input Keno's 20 numbers pulled......personally i think lottosync would work wonders on Ontario Keno. I plan on purchasing a copy of his program and toying with 1.6 and 1.7I also read in your posts that y... [ More ]

Reply #10

vick — Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:06:32 GMT

Raziel i had some success with both versions 1.6 1.7 with Ontario Keno, but 1.8 should be much better i think

Reply #9

Raziel — Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:38:28 GMT

VickYes I would love to play keno here in Ontario with LS 1.8 or Lottoarchitech.How have you found LS 1.6 and 1.7 to work on KenoRaziel

Reply #8

vick — Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:26:05 GMT

i'm waiting for ver 1.8 to get

Reply #7

lottoarchitect — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:09:59 GMT

p value has an important role in predicting future outcomes. This assumes we use it on a truly random dvent where the expectation matches the actual outcomes when large statistical data gathered. This also means p value can be effectively used in lotteries too, as long as these are truly random dvents. Do we have any good proof of this? Or the existance of trends, bias (even lottery cheats if they happen) etc shows something different?Still p value will be the same when we analyse same type lott... [ More ]

Reply #6

Guru — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:52:48 GMT

Apagogeas:I don't really agree with your point of view that one 6/49 lottery compared to another is so different, even if the machine or whatever means are used to produce the draws are completely different !!If you determine the p value for let's say a group of 10 numbers randomly chosen to match 4 numbers drawn in a 6/49 lotto. You will see that every 6/49 lotto, nomatter what machine they use will obey (with a certain degree of freedom ofcourse) to the expectance of that p value. Then tell me... [ More ]

Reply #5

lottoarchitect — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:47:03 GMT

Guru, different ideas produce different outputs. This is normal as everybody has his own ideas.Lotteries are rather difficult subjects to say that someone can produce good results without the need to modify anything. The ability to modify things is a solution to this. I want to be able to search for properties that possibly lead to better results and this can be seen in my program too. But, the options are not unlimited . They are exactly those needed to let all those tools function to their be... [ More ]

Reply #4

relowe — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:19:54 GMT

And I shall probably have a go at Guru's Synchronizer when it is released but at the moment the heat seems to be on the Lotto Architect. Now I have only had this a day or so - read the help file - seems to cover the topic pretty well. Is the program complicated? - don't think so but all software takes a while to get used to and for one to be able to navigate their way around with ease and confidence.Lotto architect has history files as most other programs doIt has an abundance of wheels which i... [ More ]

Reply #3

Raziel — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:08:06 GMT

Well said GuruI do plan on purchasing your soft and giving it a test run at some point......looking forward to that 1.8 version.....and i do agree with you about trying to keep everything behind the scenes and making sure it is maximal as you say........for me that is perfect because it makes my life easier.....however there are people who like to tinker with the software and that is what architect allows...and that's goign to require a lot of tinkering.But if 1.8 works like your 1.8 odds report... [ More ]

Reply #2

Guru — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:58:33 GMT

Hi,I want you all to know that I'm not trying to write a complex program with unlimited options that the average user will drown into. Instead I'm trying to make Lotto Synchronizer as streamlined as possible and have it work at best with just a few clicks on a button. I don't believe lotto software has to offer virtually unlimited possible strategies that the user can fit and puzzle together. I'm trying to create 1 complete strategy that will make it cutting edge for everyone (not only lotto ana... [ More ]

Reply #1

Irvin — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:42:59 GMT

I have 1.6 and put it on the back burner. The results were not that great. Well try 1.8 when it is ready and back test it.

Lottoarchitect and Lottosync

Raziel — Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:36:00 GMT

hello everyone.....I've been lurking this site for a long time but have never posted......I'm from Ontario Canada and like 'Lottosyncman' am trying my best to get an edge in winning the 649, O49 or the super7 and lately pick 3 and Keno. Anyways I've just downloaded the lottoarchitect demo.......and right now I'm sifting through it trying to figure it out....what i've seen so far makes this an excellent program....it's a lot different then many other programs I've purshased some good most bad. I... [ More ]