South Lotto Test

Reply #63

RJOh — Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:54:28 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottery_Analyst on October 16, 2004Hi RJOh,Well ironically I did the best on my last drawing test. ..... I will add up the final totals tomorrow........................Anyway, it was fun. Thanks for participating....John - LAI assume your final tally wasn't worth posting. I see another system competition is starting in another thread, it will be interesting to see if any of those systems do any better.RJOh

Reply #62

RJOh — Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:09:19 GMT

FILE NAME REC.NO. DATE NUMBERS LOTSOUTH 324 10/16/04 20 23 27 29 39 41 _________________________________________________________ LA 99 10/16/04 23 29 37 39 41 47 90 10/16/04 14 23 27 29 37 42 86 10/16/04 13 26 27 29 32 39 84 10/16/04 13 17 27 39 41 46 46 10/16/04 06 13 23 27 38 39Your system is starting to click. I agree,it is more funto use your own specially picked numb... [ More ]

Reply #61

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:20:53 GMT

Hi RJOh,Well ironically I did the best on my last drawing test. I hit 3 of 6, four times and had one 4 of 6 winner on line 99. I will add up the final totals tomorrow but I think the only way my system could have won was if I had hit 5 of 6 tonight or hit 4 of 6 two or three times.Anyway, it was fun. Thanks for participating....John - LA

Reply #60

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:25:07 GMT

3 4 6 29 35 36 3 4 9 11 24 38 3 4 19 23 24 32 3 6 8 16 26 29 3 6 8 32 38 46 3 6 9 10 19 29 3 6 11 24 29 48 3 6 14 29 46 47 3 6 16 27 29 42 3 8 13 17 26 38 3 9 23 32 36 48 3 10 11 23 32 35 3 10 24 28 36 38 3 13 27 28 37 39 3 17 28 37 41 42 3 23 27 42 47 49 3 26 38 39 41 47 4 6 10 26 48 49 4 6 19 24 26 37 4 8 9 10 19 49 4 8 9 11 27 41 4 8 10 39 42 48 4 8 35 36 48 49 4 9 11 23 29 32 4 9 11 13 42 47 4 9 11 14 17 39 4 9 14 16 24 47 4 10 11 16 39 41 4 10 13 14 41 48 4 10 17 27 47 48 4 10 37 46 48 49 4... [ More ]

Reply #59

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:22:28 GMT

RJOh,Here goes my last 100 picks. If I don't do well tonight, I might begin playing random myself. LOL Just joking. I will still pick my own numbers. More fun for me that way, even if I lose. At least I feel like I have a little control. LOLGood luck to you too...John - LA

Reply #58

RJOh — Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:42:13 GMT

LA,Glad to check, I'm just as interested in the results as you are. Good luck on your picks for tonight.RJOh

Reply #57

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:35:47 GMT

Hi RJOh,Thanks for double checking. I didn't think I matched anything. LOLYep, Saturday is my last shot at this. You know last night in my Lottery Club I tried something different. We purchased 50 tickets and I selected just 2 numbers on each ticket and let the computer select the remaining 4 numbers. I think we hit 3 or 4, 3 of 6 wins using that method. LOL Anyway, we will see what happens on Saturday.Thanks,John - LA

Reply #56

RJOh — Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:07:49 GMT

You matched three one time, better luck this Saturday. FILE NAME REC.NO. DATE NUMBERS LOTSOUTH 323 10/13/04 09 18 31 35 42 49 ___________________________________________________________ LA 97 10/13/04 03 09 13 35 42 47RJOh

Reply #55

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:45:39 GMT

My numbers for 10/13/04 - drawing test # 5 1 3 4 6 42 35 27 2 14 4 17 42 35 13 3 24 6 8 42 35 40 4 33 6 28 42 27 13 5 14 8 28 42 27 40 6 24 17 28 42 13 40 7 3 8 17 35 27 13 8 44 6 17 35 27 40 9 44 4 28 35 13 40 10 33 4 8 27 13 40 11 12 4 7 35 27 11 12 24 4 13 35 27 38 13 25 7 9 35 27 41 14 43 7 40 35 11 38 15 24 9 40 35 11 41 16 25 13 40 35 38 41 17 12 9 13 27 11 38 18 33 7 13 27 11 41 19 33 4 40 27 38 41 20 43 4 9 11 38 41 21 12 2 4 27 11 46 22 24 2 26 27 11 49 23 22 4 6 27 11 32 24 39 4 42 27

Reply #54

RJOh — Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:56:40 GMT

Hello John - LA,I noticed your last one hundred numbers didn't include 13 numbers, 3 or which were among the winning numbers. Such a selected bias can serve you well when all the winning numbers are in your group, however having all 49 numbers seem to have served the random group better over time. Having all 49 numbers in the random group an equal amount is also a bias that might not happen in 100 QP's from a terminal. That bias was introduced into the group by the way the RNG was used. It's... [ More ]

Reply #53

Lottery_Analyst — Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:41:28 GMT

Hi RJOh,Looks like random selections is winning hands down. I have two more drawings to play. This little experiment should be over by next Saturday. Unless I win big these next two drawings, I might start playing random picks myself. LOLTalk to you soon....John - LA

Reply #52

RJOh — Sun, 10 Oct 2004 03:25:58 GMT

The best the random numbers could do is match 3 three times. I think the above group match 2 twelve times, but no match 3's or 4's. Better luck next time.RJOh

Reply #51

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 10 Oct 2004 02:38:42 GMT

My numbers for 10/09/04 - not in numeric order...sorry....no time..1 46 35 4 9 42 13 2 46 35 4 19 49 10 3 46 35 9 19 43 244 46 32 4 9 49 245 46 32 4 19 43 13 6 46 32 9 19 42 10 7 35 32 4 9 43 10 8 35 32 4 19 42 249 35 32 9 19 49 13 10 35 27 4 7 39 13 11 35 27 4 44 29 1012 35 27 7 44 41 3813 35 16 4 7 29 3814 35 16 4 44 41 13 15 35 16 7 44 39 10 16 27 16 4 7 41 10 17 27 16 4 44 39 3818 27 16 7 44 29 13 19

Reply #50

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:05:43 GMT

Hi RJOh,You have done with your Random picks, what I was hoping Trance and I could do with system picks. In 5 drawings you have won 4 of 6 twice, and you have one more drawing to go. I have three more drawings to go and I will need to win big in order to catch up to or pass what your Random picks have done. We will see what happens. Regardless, this has been a fun test. Please let me know if you see any errors to my calculations below?Thanks,John - LAHypothetical Lotto South Experiment DateA... [ More ]

Reply #49

RJOh — Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:29:27 GMT

L.A.None of the numbers you didn't play came up. These are the results. FILE NAME LOTSOUTH 321 10/06/04 03 10 13 24 28 38 _____________________________________________ LA 89 10/06/04 09 11 13 24 37 38 62 10/06/04 04 13 24 35 38 47 60 10/06/04 04 13 24 32 35 38 33 10/06/04 03 10 14 35 38 49 32 10/06/04 03 10 14 17 24 46... [ More ]

Reply #48

RJOh — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:11:36 GMT

I hope none of the winning numbers are among 01 12 15 18 20 21 22 34 45, good luck to you.RJOh

Reply #47

Lottery_Analyst — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 22:10:01 GMT

Hi RJOH,It's 6:08pm so this should be early enough. LOL Hope my numbers do well. If not, I will try 3 more times anyway. Good luck with your random picks.Thanks,John - LA######27819414427193336372723283644282633364429112632402911243035292432374121124262937211293235412192326364121926283744224293032403581314263514174447352326294736814162736112732373614233247378143846371035394237141743493723363948372435464937374247483810434649382627444738273239473916234247391637384339263538473101123424831014172... [ More ]

Reply #46

RJOh — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:06:17 GMT

Lottery Analyst,I hope you will post your next numbers at least a half hour before the drawing, as you are probably aware, posting your numbers at 11:00pm gives you the option of editing them until about 11:10pm which is well after the drawing is done. I know as you wrote to Trance, you don't want this test to be a joke right? Good luck on your next picks, I'm hoping your system can do better than those random picks.RJOh

Reply #45

RJOh — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 04:10:08 GMT

LOTSOUTH 320 10/02/04 08 17 23 25 35 37_____________________________________________ LS092204 76 09/22/04 08 23 29 35 37 46I checked the file and it only matched four once. Just use your late list for the next drawing or do you pick your numbers based on the last numbers drawn? Apparently Trance didn't know what he was talking about when he said it was impossible for the random group to match 4 again with in the six drawings and it could not do better than a system.... [ More ]

Reply #44

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 03:17:02 GMT

RJOh,I just glanced through your numbers and you would have won 4 of 6 at least once. Looks like your random system is working well. LOLI will check your complete set later and my numbers just out of curiosity.Thanks,John - LA

Reply #43

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 03:09:49 GMT

RJOh,I tried to get my numbers posted before 11:00pm but I had problems again. I was in such a rush to post them that I did not have the time to sort them. Since I did not get them posted until 11:04, this test set of numbers does not count. I will try and post numbers for Wednesday.Good luckThanks,John - LA

Reply #42

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 03:04:21 GMT

15 3 6 24 29 38 39 3 16 24 29 49 35 6 7 24 29 47 42 6 19 24 38 49 39 7 19 24 38 47 35 16 19 24 49 47 15 7 16 29 38 49 41 6 16 29 38 47 41 3 19 29 49 47 42 3 7 38 49 47 13 4 6 23 27 32 35 4 17 23 27 47 39 6 8 23 27 46 45 6 16 23 32 47 35 8 17 23 32 46 39 14 16 23 47 46 13 8 14 27 32 47 24 6 14 27 32 46 24 4 16 27 47 46 45 4 8 32 47 46 13 3 4 26 27 38 30 3 16 26 27 48 39 4 7 26 27 42 40 4 10 26 38 48 30 7 10 26 38 42 39 16 10 26 48 42 13 7 16 27 38 48 14 4 16 27 38 42 14 3 10 27 48 42 40 3 7 38 48... [ More ]

Reply #41

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 03:00:41 GMT

15 3 6 26 29 32 30 3 14 26 29 46 35 6 8 26 29 42 40 6 17 26 32 46 30 8 17 26 32 42 35 14 17 26 46 42 15 8 14 29 32 46 19 6 14 29 32 42 19 3 17 29 46 42 40 3 8 32 46 42 13 4 7 23 26 38 35 4 16 23 26 46 30 7 9 23 26 48 42 7 14 23 38 46 35 9 14 23 38 48 30 16 14 23 46 48 13 9 16 26 38 46 27 7 16 26 38 48 27 4 14 26 46 48 42 4 9 38 46 48 13 2 6 28 24 37 35 2 11 28 24 47 39 6 9 28 24 42 40 6 14 28 37 47 35 9 14 28 37 42 39 11 14 28 47 42 13 9 11 24 37 47 48 6 11 24 37 42 48 2 14 24 47 42 40 2 9 37 47... [ More ]

Reply #40

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:11:54 GMT

Hi RJOh,Thanks for the info. I will continue to post my predictions for the Lotto South drawings. Hopefully I do better than I have so far. Thanks,John - LA

Reply #39

RJOh — Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:37:55 GMT

FILE NAME LOTSOUTH 319 09/29/04 13 15 30 35 39 40______________________________________________ LS092204 26 09/22/04 10 11 13 21 30 39L.A.,Tonight, the random file only matched 3. Since Trance is only a guest and can no longer post, you'll be the only one posting numbers. Good luck to you.RJOh

Reply #38

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:49:09 GMT

Hi RJOh and Trance,Sorry I did not post my numbers tonight. I did not have time. I just got home from my class about 15 minutes ago. I will definitely post numbers for Saturday's drawing.Good Luck.Thanks,John - LA

Reply #37

RJOh — Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:35:25 GMT

Lottery Analyst,Glad to hear you plan to continue to post for all six drawings. I'm a system player too and I prefer to think that a player that picks his numbers with a thoughtful strategy has an edge on the players that pick their numbers randomly. Good luck to you and I'm sure our guest Trance(Goose) will be watching the results also.RJOh

Reply #36

RJOh — Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:47:16 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on September 22, 2004Trance,You're starting to sound like a former Lottery Post member that went by the names Lotto King, Goose, Desperado and others. He also claimed to know some lottery secrets and posted a lot of BS that proved nothing. Time will tell if you are any different.RJOhLotto King, Goose, Desperado and etc. had his act together for two months until he restarted his old habits on Sept 22. Then it was just a matter of time before he was outed. You... [ More ]

Reply #35

RJOh — Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:17:22 GMT

L.A.,I've been reading yours and Trance's posts in another thread and I had hoped this test would continue as planned. As I expressed in my PM to you, Trance of Iowa acted and posted like the Goose of China and with his style of posting he would expose his real identity and lose his member status. I see he is now only a guess. I had hoped one of you would prove that numbers picked using a thoughtfully designed system would do better than the dumb luck of an equal amount of randomly picked num... [ More ]

Reply #34

Lottery_Analyst — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:02:47 GMT

We will see......I am more concerned with how well you and I do with our system picks. LOLGood luck.....John - LA

Reply #33

trance — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:01:01 GMT

since RJOH's random picks have hit 4 one time,it would be almost impossible to hit 4 again in the next 3 draws.

Reply #32

Lottery_Analyst — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:32:11 GMT

RJOh,Trance is correct. You won $115.00 on 09/25/04 instead of $105.00. Good job.Trance,Thanks for catching the $10.00 oversight....John - LA

Reply #31

trance — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:09:12 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on September 26, 2004 FILE NAME LOTSOUTH 318 09/25/04 01 20 28 36 38 41____________________________________________________ LS092204 85 09/22/04 01 03 09 38 39 41 83 09/22/04 01 28 33 36 42 48 72 09/22/04 01 15 18 20 41 43 24 09/22/04 06 20 25 28 36 38LA, check my file again, I show that line #24 matched 4 which paid $90 in Kentucky. That would put my rando... [ More ]

Reply #30

BobP — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 05:38:58 GMT

For what it's worth:A wheel to guarantee a minimum of one 3# prize in a 6/49 game requires at least 163 lines for a split wheel consisting of a 22,6,3,3,77 and a 27,6,3,4,86 wheel placed side by side. A straight up build without splitting the fields would take about 300 lines. Code for wheels, first number is the Pool size, second is Ticket or Play size, third is Prize or Match size, forth is Hits winning numbers in our Pool to guarantee Prize, fifth is how many lines it takes to do it. CoverMa... [ More ]

Reply #29

trance — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 05:04:03 GMT

and I am sure that day wo

Reply #28

trance — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 04:52:21 GMT

No bother.when the system could make a 5 of 6 winner one day,the advantage will be very clear.

Reply #27

RJOh — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:50:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottery_Analyst on September 26, 2004Trance, You and I really need to get our act together or this little experiment is going to prove that random picks are better than your system or mine, and we can't have that. Lottery Analyst,I agree, having played the Ohio649 lottery over the years, I expected the random file to just match the *lowest prize odds.6 of 6 of 49 = 1 : 13,983,8165 of 6 = 1 : 54,201*4 of 6 = 1 : 1032*3 of 6 = 1 : 57During 6 x 100 or 600 plays that wo... [ More ]

Reply #26

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:26:04 GMT

Hi RJOh and Trance,RJOh, you are absolutely correct and I apologize for the oversight. Guess that is what I get for looking at the numbers at 2:57am. LOL Big congrats to you.Trance, You and I really need to get our act together or this little experiment is going to prove that random picks are better than your system or mine, and we can't have that. LOLPick some good numbers for Wednesday and I will do the same.Thanks,JohnNew Updated Performance stats:Trance - Tickets played 268 - Amount won... [ More ]

Reply #25

RJOh — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 06:56:20 GMT

FILE NAME LOTSOUTH 318 09/25/04 01 20 28 36 38 41____________________________________________________ LS092204 85 09/22/04 01 03 09 38 39 41 83 09/22/04 01 28 33 36 42 48 72 09/22/04 01 15 18 20 41 43 24 09/22/04 06 20 25 28 36 38LA, check my file again, I show that line #24 matched 4 which paid $90 in Kentucky. That would put my random file ahead of both of you.RJOhP.S. Those match 3's we... [ More ]

Reply #24

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 06:37:41 GMT

Hi Trance and RJOh,Well, looks like our systems or methods did not fair very well again. At least RJOh's random picks won 3 of 6 three times. Trance, neither your system or mine has been impressive at all thus far. Hopefully we both do better with the next 4 drawings.Good Luck,John - LAExperiment Summary thus far:Trance - Tickets played 268 - Amount won - ($0.00)RJOh - Tickets played 200 - Amount won - ($12.00 to $15.00)John - LA Tickets played 200 - Amount won - ($12.00

Reply #23

trance — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:47:47 GMT

Good luck

Reply #22

Lottery_Analyst — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:46:32 GMT

Hi Trance and RJOh,Here are my numbers for tonight's drawing. It is now 10:43 pm EST so I just made it. ;-)Good luck.....John - LA 2 4 17 20 23 38 8 22 24 26 27 35 2 5 13 17 20 29 8 26 33 38 42 43 2 6 14 35 37 47 9 11 13 28 43 46 2 7 13 20 21 36 9 11 13 16 20 42 2 9 11 35 42 49 9 11 14 16 47 49 2 11 14 31 32 35 9 11 18 35 37 41 2 14 16 18 37 49 9 13 16 19 24 49 2 14 16 17 23 36 9 23 27 32 38 41 3 4 16 24 28 43 9 27 29 31 42 48 3 6 12 26 27 32 10 17 33 37 39 46 3 6 27 35 38 42 11 12 14 23 27 32... [ More ]

Reply #21

trance — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:01:47 GMT

the odds of a 3 of 6 is 1:57.So john's $15 winning has just matched the odds a bit more.lets see If theres going to be a consist odds matching of a $15.To break the odds,100 lines should produce a 4 of 6 at least.The odds of a 4 of 6 is 1:1032,and the odds of a 5 of 6 is 1:54,201.Also we will see if anyone of us will make a 5 of 6 winner within all 6 draw tests.

Reply #20

trance — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:56:46 GMT

the odds of a 4 of 5 winner is 1:3,387.my 317 lines making a 4 of 5 has improved odds 10 times and more.

Reply #19

trance — Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:28:52 GMT

100 tickets for Lotto South drawing on 09/25/04 4 6 14 23 45 49 5 8 17 35 42 4810 19 23 34 35 3914 19 23 34 35 3912 18 25 34 35 3816 18 25 34 35 3816 18 21 30 35 3813 17 26 34 35 3817 18 26 30 34 3510 18 23 27 30 4714 18 23 27 30 4716 19 24 26 35 3612 16 23 25 32 3816 17 23 25 32 3415 16 25 27 31 35 4 8 16 25 43 48 4 8 17 25 41 4512 16 25 33 34 4613 17 27 31 33 4313 17 25 33 43 4414 17 26 34 35 3813 15 27 34 35 3913 15 27 34 35 3615 16 21 34 35 3810 14 23 30 34 3510 14 23 34 35 3914 15 23 33... [ More ]

Reply #18

RJOh — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:21:05 GMT

LA,That is correct. My picks weren't effected by what hit in the last few drawings or the most popular numbers, so a different set of numbers picked the same way should have the same mix. I haven't tried to develop a system for Lotto South, but I do play Ohio SuperLotto which is a 6/49 game but draws an extra ball as a bonus.In my experiences, similar games work differently in different areas. As I explained in another post to Trance about his picks in the Georgia Fantasy5. What was a $19 lo... [ More ]

Reply #17

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:51:21 GMT

Hi RJOh,So if I understand you correctly, you want us to use your same 100 number sets from this last drawing, in the next 5 drawings? I think we agreed to test our numbers on a total of 6 Lotto South drawings.Thanks,John - LA

Reply #16

RJOh — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:43:43 GMT

People who regularly play 1-2-3-4-5-6 probably didn't think those numbers were weird. Since my 100 lines were random, they will be just as good/bad in any future test. Good luck to both of you on Saturday.RJOh

Reply #15

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:19:39 GMT

Trance,It does not matter. That will happen in a Lottery drawing. Any effective system should take that into consideration. If there were no (weird ones), it would be easier to predict the numbers. LOLLet's see what happens on Saturday. Good Luck....John - LA

Reply #14

trance — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:28:29 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/lottery-results-history.asp?i=44If you check past 10 south lotto draws,you will find wed's number is a weird one.

Reply #13

Lottery_Analyst — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:57:20 GMT

Hi Trance and RJOh,Guess we are all off to a slow start. According to my figures, Trance and RJOh did not match anything and I did not do much better. I did match 3 of 6 three times for a big win of $12.00.So on paper:Trance played and lost $171.00 - I gave you credit for all 171 tickets you posted. -$171.00RJOh played and lost $100.00 -$100.00John - Lottery Analyst played $100.00 and won $12.00 -$88.00OK test draw number two. 100 tickets each for the Lotto South drawing on 09/25... [ More ]

Reply #12

RJOh — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 03:31:23 GMT

To night's winning Lotto South numbers were 04-05-06-31-40-41. There were no match three's in my list of numbers. The winning numbers had matched three four times in the previous 316 drawings. The odds of a match 3 = 1:57, I didn't even match the odds.Match 0 = 43Match 1 = 39Match 2 = 18Match 3 = 0RJOh

Reply #11

RJOh — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:08:18 GMT

When Trance first posted only 49 lines, I posted the first 50 lines of this group to keep the comparison meaningful. Now that he and you have posted 98 and 100 lines I am posting the whole group of 100 randomly picked lines to make the comparison more meaningful. 07 12 15 30 48 49 03 08 10 31 40 43 04 08 20 23 31 39 17 18 20 30 33 39 05 13 17 25 29 42 06 19 21 22 41 47 10 18 24 27 32 37 13 24 36 37 38 44 16 19 28 33 34... [ More ]

Reply #10

Lottery_Analyst — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:05:12 GMT

OK Trance and RJOh,Here are my 100 selections. Would be awesome if one of us predicted all 6 numbers. On second thought, that would suck because we are not playing them in reality. LOLBest of success to us all tonight....Thanks,John - LA23919274047132329372315273336471423262824711344347163238402473540414738434649241329434648141939432416324144481826283727919464848232642472711133846491623294627123240444923273537271423284641013232746272032384141014263747291723284841113213843292123344641113344649... [ More ]

Reply #9

twisted — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:11:19 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on September 22, 2004Quote: Originally posted by trance on September 22, 2004These 98 lines are my predictions for south lotto on wednesday. ..........the results of these 98 lines and your 50 quicks and my 100 quick picks will have a battle now.let me reveal the lottery mystery tonight! Trance,You're starting to sound like a former Lottery Post member that went by the names Lotto King, Goose, Desperado and others. He also claimed to know some lottery secrets... [ More ]

Reply #8

RJOh — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:46:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by trance on September 22, 2004These 98 lines are my predictions for south lotto on wednesday. ..........the results of these 98 lines and your 50 quicks and my 100 quick picks will have a battle now.let me reveal the lottery mystery tonight! Trance,You're starting to sound like a former Lottery Post member that went by the names Lotto King, Goose, Desperado and others. He also claimed to know some lottery secrets and posted a lot of BS that proved nothing. Time will... [ More ]

Reply #7

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:59:44 GMT

John,these are my 98 lines of prediction(those 26 lines dont count)3 7 25 27 42 44 1 7 23 25 42 48 5 7 23 25 42 48 7 8 25 27 42 49 3 7 25 28 42 48 3 8 23 25 41 45 7 8 23 25 41 45 4 6 25 27 42 45 6 8 25 27 42 45 2 6 20 27 41 45 1 8 23 27 41 45 5 8 23 27 41 45 7 8 25 27 42 48 1 7 23 27 42 48 5 7 23 27 42 48 3 16 23 25 43 44 7 16 23 25 43 44 4 17 22 27 42 48 8 17 22 27 42 48 4 14 25 29 42 45 8 14 25 29 42 45 2 8 23 33 42 44 6 8 23 33 42 44 1 9 23 30 42 44 5... [ More ]

Reply #6

Lottery_Analyst — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:57:18 GMT

Trance,This is a joke right? We originally agreed on 55 sets of numbers, then I said ok to 100, now you posted 172 sets. Anyone should be able to at least win 4 of 6 with 172 sets. In order to properly test a system, you need to agree to the controls set and work within those controls. RJOh posted 50 sets. Comparing 50 sets to 172 is not fair or accurate. Let's see what happens with everyone's numbers tonight. But for Saturday's drawing, let's please agree on an amount of sets and stick with... [ More ]

Reply #5

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:33:56 GMT

These 98 lines are my predictions for south lotto on wednesday.It took the computer two and twenty minutes to have produced the 98 lines result., 3 7 25 27 42 44 1 7 23 25 42 48 5 7 23 25 42 48 7 8 25 27 42 49 3 7 25 28 42 48 3 8 23 25 41 45 7 8 23 25 41 45 4 6 25 27 42 45 6 8 25 27 42 45 2 6 20 27 41 45 1 8 23 27 41 45 5 8 23 27 41 45 7 8 25 27 42 48 1 7 23 27 42 48 5 7 23 27 42 48 3 16 23 25 43 44 7 16 23 25 43 44 4 17 22 27 42 48 8 17 22 27 42 48 4 14 25 29 4... [ More ]

Reply #4

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:25:55 GMT

These 26 lines are produced from the system working.we will compare the results generated by quick picks generator from those from the system.It took 30 seconds before all the 26 lines come out. 3 7 25 27 42 44 2 14 20 27 41 45 6 14 20 27 41 45 1 16 23 27 41 45 5 16 23 27 41 45 1 15 23 27 42 48 5 15 23 27 42 48 4 14 25 37 42 45 8 14 25 37 42 45 3 14 25 33 42 48 7 14 25 33 42 4810 15 19 30 34 4214 15 19 30 34 4210 15 17 33 42 4414 15 17 33 42 4412 17 19 30 34 3816 17 19 30 34 3813 16 17 33 35 39... [ More ]

Reply #3

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:11:42 GMT

You are damn right.The numbers I posted this time is generated by my own quick pick generator.Next time I will post numbers from the system.

Reply #2

RJOh — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:51:12 GMT

Here are 50 lines selected randomly. The 50 lines include all 49 numbers. 07 12 15 30 48 49 10 11 13 21 30 39 04 08 20 23 31 39 14 31 32 34 40 42 05 13 17 25 29 42 16 26 27 30 35 43 10 18 24 27 32 37 09 10 12 29 38 44 16 19 28 33 34 44 02 05 08 17 24 47 01 06 11 14 43 45 01 04 22 37 48 49 02 03 09 22 36 47 04 09 14 18 30 36 21 35 38 40 41 46 18 23 38 43 47

Reply #1

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 06:44:28 GMT

The test is just a test.I have to let you expect less in order to let you expect more if some people could understand what I mean.This time I can hit 3,and hit more and more afterwards.Good luck to you all too!Trance

South Lotto Test

trance — Wed, 22 Sep 2004 05:40:49 GMT

Wed,sep 22,2004 South Lotto 100 LINES PREDICTION7 8 20 24 42 455 7 21 25 44 457 8 22 23 42 457 9 20 23 44 455 7 22 23 45 467 8 22 25 41 455 7 22 23 44 485 7 22 26 44 457 8 23 25 41 455 7 21 24 45 497 8 23 25 44 456 8 24 26 44 457 9 22 27 44 457 17 23 24 41 427 8 23 27 44 457 16 20 23 42 467 16 22 25 40 445 15 24 26 40 456 8 26 29 41 457 8 23 26 45 465 7 25 26 46 471 15 25 33 41 427 8 24 33 42 446 8 25 27 44 488 15 24 26 41 457 8 23 32 44 457 17 25 26 41 446 8 27 37 40 428 15 23 26 42 467 8 23 32... [ More ]