<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>lottoblaster</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/96866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: lottoblaster</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/263101</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/263101</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Fenix on October 01, 2004Quote: Originally posted by BobP on October 01, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Fenix on September 30, 2004Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on September 30, 2004thanks bob, I had a feeling it was a dud, but your confirmation just sealed it for me.thanks. Just interested, why do you think it is a  dud ?Because the split field makes winning a jackpot physically impossible in almost every draw.  If you want to get really technical the odds of</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262986</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262986</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Fenix</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by BobP on October 01, 2004 Quote: Originally posted by Fenix on September 30, 2004 Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on September 30, 2004  thanks bob, I had a feeling it was a dud, but your confirmation just sealed it for me.thanks. Just interested, why do you think it is a  dud ?Because the split field makes winning a jackpot physically impossible in almost every draw.   If you want to get really technical the odds of winning when you finally do get all the numbers</p>]]></description>
			<category>Fenix</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262984</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262984</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Fenix on September 30, 2004Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on September 30, 2004thanks bob, I had a feeling it was a dud, but your confirmation just sealed it for me.thanks. Just interested, why do you think it is a  dud ?Because the split field makes winning a jackpot physically impossible in almost every draw.  If you want to get really technical the odds of winning when you finally do get all the numbers on one side make it all equal, but after you still lose w... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262984">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262621</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262621</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:53:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Fenix</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on September 30, 2004 thanks bob, I had a feeling it was a dud, but your confirmation just sealed it for me.thanks.Just interested, why do you think it is a  dud</p>]]></description>
			<category>Fenix</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262611</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262611</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks bob, I had a feeling it was a dud, but your confirmation just sealed it for me.thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262596</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866/262596</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: O</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>lottoblaster</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/96866</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>anyone know anything about this method by maclean publishing</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

