Lottosync

Reply #32

paul762 — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:15:38 GMT

so running it for 20 hours would probably have given the same 4 numbers plus it could have brought the other 2 numbers into line also, I know you say it would make only a small difference but 1 number off on 2 numbers is a small difference so you never know-marvellous

Reply #31

LANTERN — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:36:42 GMT

Thanks a lot very much, Guru.It's just what I wanted to hear.Good Luck.

Reply #30

Guru — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:14:52 GMT

I'm working on a better way to predict the bonus balls independently.In the final version you will be able to predict the bonus balls seperate from the main balls.I believe this will allow virtually any type of lottery game to be forecasted.

Reply #29

Guru — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:12:14 GMT

Answer to the running it more than 10 hours question.Well, the difference between running it 10 hours or 20 hours will most likely be very small. I'm talking about maybe 0.05 value differences or so. It depends a bit on the conditions.The difference between running it 1 hour or running it 4 hours, will most likely be a lot bigger. These results could differ more than a value of 3 up or down.Basicly, it will not harm the prediction (thats with the 1.8 engine) if it runs for 20 hours or more, but... [ More ]

Reply #28

LANTERN — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:54:42 GMT

VickI don't think that Paul was talking about running LottoSync twice, but about running it past the 10 hours up to about 20 hours or so, maybe past the point of optimum prediction, would LottoSync keep on running forever if you let it, or would it have to stop sooner or later after a given number of hours or when it reaches the maximum point of accuracy?As to wheeling all 10 numbers for both main and bonus balls, that is taking too much of a chance, it would be like choosing a random or quick p... [ More ]

Reply #27

vick — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:58:20 GMT

i think running it longer ie higher sample rates increases the accuracy, but according to guru the program usually never gives the exact same predictions, so if you had run it again after this 1st 10 hr for anither 10hr it would probably be different.Bonus numbers? i mean i would just let lottosynch predict 10 numbers and wheel em hopefully the bonus is also there also with the others

Reply #26

LANTERN — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:52:40 GMT

Yes, Guru said that LottoSync could be used with pick 3 and I think that maybe also pick 4, 5, 6, but not any good at all for separate bonus ball(s) and power ball(s), just for the main balls.Here on Texas we have the pick 3, Tx2Step, TxCash5, TxLotto and the MegaMillions.I hope that I can use LottoSync for all of them.I wish that I could play Keno online., Somewhere?Paul's question is very interesting. Is there any such thing as over-doing the time with LottoSync?Probably not. (?)Vick wants an... [ More ]

Reply #25

paul762 — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:19:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 04, 2004Paul:It ran 10 hours on my 2gigherz laptophi guru, what would have happened if you had ran it for 20 hours, would the 4 numbers still have stayed the same, and the other 2 got even closer perhaps? or would it have given you a different set of 6 numbers

Reply #24

vick — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:48:25 GMT

well you could use ver 1.8 for pick 3 and 649 too right

Reply #23

LANTERN — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:34:23 GMT

Yes, I know what you mean, I can't wait for it either, but here on Texas we have no Keno lottery games at all, I sure wish that we did, if you all are doing so well with it out there.

Reply #22

vick — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:23:25 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #21

LANTERN — Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:05:15 GMT

No, I think that 25 euros is more like it for the limited version plus whatever ammount you want for prediction credits which will be extra of course, about 20 to 30 euros, but no more than 30, 25 seems about right.As to the beta, I am sure that all of us who have 1.5 to 1.7 wants it and really bad, but best with the pick 3 and up options and the filters and wheels.

Reply #20

vick — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:29:05 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #19

lottoshlep — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:18:37 GMT

Do I hear 30 euros?! ..

Reply #18

vick — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 18:21:08 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 05, 2004We are thinking about also releasing a less expensive version of Lottosync 1.8A version (all features included) where you can buy prediction credits. This would allow you to try the software for X number of times for a fairly low price tag. When your credits are all used, you can decide to leave it at that or buy new credits. Or ultimatly you can decide buying the unlimited version (at the current price) wich also includes unlimited future upgr... [ More ]

Reply #17

LANTERN — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:08:07 GMT

A very important thing is to always be open to new ideas and possibilities and of course to have an unbending will to learn and win and to never never give up.

Reply #16

Guru — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:13:35 GMT

Paul:as an origina

Reply #15

paul762 — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:43:09 GMT

so what do original purchasers of 1.6 receive? and what about future upgrades? what more are you likely to be able to do , prediction wise anyway

Reply #14

Guru — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:12:16 GMT

We are thinking about also releasing a less expensive version of Lottosync 1.8A version (all features included) where you can buy prediction credits. This would allow you to try the software for X number of times for a fairly low price tag. When your credits are all used, you can decide to leave it at that or buy new credits. Or ultimatly you can decide buying the unlimited version (at the current price) wich also includes unlimited future upgrades for free.Our current customers would ofcourse r... [ More ]

Reply #13

Guru — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:00:20 GMT

Paul and others:The majority of predictions with all numbers landing so close is a little utopic. If that could be established I would win the lottery 20 times or more in a year simply by deviating the result a little up and down and playing all possible combinations with the base and deviated numbers.No, you can expect to encounter very close results with so little numbers predicted reasonably frequent, but certainly not all the time.

Reply #12

spock — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:36:28 GMT

Reply #11

paul762 — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:28:07 GMT

if the majority of predictions end up like the one you posted, who can ask for more.

Reply #10

lottoshlep — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:02:17 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #9

Guru — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:50:55 GMT

Breaking even in a lottery game is not good, it is excellent. This is because all lotteries are designed for the majority to loose a lot of money on the long run. Lotteries handle at least a 1 to 36 chance of winning the lowest prize. It's even worse in most big jackpot lotteries. Guessing will most probably not bring you even close to breaking even unless you get extremely lucky and win a top prize.Think about it, you are gonna play lotto anyway. What do you prefer, breaking even or loosing you... [ More ]

Reply #8

RJOh — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:00:27 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LANTERN on October 04, 2004If I just wanted to break even I would not bother to play at all, by not playing, I would already be breaking even.Breaking even when playing a lottery to me means you are playing for nothing. Not playing at all means you are not even in the game. Do you really believe that playing for millions of dollars at no cost is the same as not playing at all? RJOh

Reply #7

LANTERN — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:48:10 GMT

Yes, time will tell, but I sure hope that it will be able to do better than just break even, I would like it to do a lot lot better than just break even, if it just breaks even then it is no good, just wasted time and effort, after all, it will keep your PC tied up for a very long long time.Breaking just even is no good, take as long as you want making it, but make it very very good, please.If I just wanted to break even I would not bother to play at all, by not playing, I would already be break... [ More ]

Reply #6

spock — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:18:16 GMT

Lets keep our feet on the ground this time round.1.6. and 1.7. cost me plenty in lost bets.Time well tell if 1.8 . can break even anything else will be a bonus.

Reply #5

Guru — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:28:05 GMT

Paul:It ran 10 hours on my 2gigherz laptop

Reply #4

paul762 — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:19:25 GMT

guru, great result! how l

Reply #3

vick — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:49:04 GMT

wow that's REALLY GOOD Guru, EXCELLENT results [ you just missed all 6 numbers by off 1's] HOLY COW !!!!!can't wait to try it, can we play with the beta around mid november then, luv to try it on keno.Again congrats on the GREAT Belgian results !!!!Lottosynch has already brought me alot of money, and i just have this feeling that it's just gunna get better for us lottosynch users

Reply #2

Guru — Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:33:12 GMT

Hi,1.8 is coming along well. A beta should be available somewhere half november.Last saturday I ran the prediction on the belgian lotto. Just 6 numbers predicted. This was the result.Lottosync prediction 7 10 19 20 21 39the draw was 7 9 19 20 21 38 +bonus 404 correct and two numbers just 1 too high. With just 6 numbers predicted, it was very close.When the beta is released, I plan to restart the live test here at the forum.

Reply #1

vick — Sun, 03 Oct 2004 23:48:48 GMT

I would be willing to be a guinea pig and test a pre-beta version for my keno

Lottosync

Raziel — Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:34:57 GMT

Guru: It's a new month and I was wondering how 1.8 is coming along...is it closeRaziel