Search

Chaos TheoryReply
Half the numbers right does not get you a win. Actually, this is half right and wrong...with respect to your assessment. If the number drawn lies within the 1/2 you consider 'correct' then, you'll get the win. If not, then you lose which is in line with the typical margin of error. The truth of the matter is that there are specific principles to follow when trying to trap the next winning combo, and, especially when severely limited to an anemic set of picks. and misleads you on the r
Feb 11, 2018, 2:30 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Some lottery winning streaks have defied beliefReply
This kind of activity has been reported here before but it doesn't amaze me that the LP brain trust still can't figure out how people like Steve Player could have established their golden reputations without having to win a thing. For now let's just stick to the subject and discuss whether it makes more sense the Mass Lottery cheated so 10 players could all cash at least 100 winning tickets valued over $600 (three cashing over 1000 tickets) or more likely the majority of those tickets were
Jul 22, 2014, 3:26 pm - Stack47 - Lottery News

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
The odds are posted on the Texas Lottery website and only you know why it was necessary to calculate and show them here. You really don't want to understand. If there really are two jackpots, There are, stop nagging. From the lottery's point of view, they know only one three digit number will be drawn and there are 990 other unplayed numbers by the player believing they improved their odds to 100 to 1. The odds stay the same, I suggest that you stop drinking alcohol. The amount of
Aug 8, 2013, 3:54 am - SergeM - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
I pasted the correctly calculated odds above. The odds are posted on the Texas Lottery website and only you know why it was necessary to calculate and show them here. Jackpots are paid for the extremes, so there are 2 jackpots. If there really are two jackpots, someone is ignoring the fact one ticket can only win one jackpot and believe it or not none of the other prizes with two chances to win can't win twice either. The odds are correct on the website (1 in 2,704,156) because once
Aug 7, 2013, 1:24 am - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

Ion SaliuReply
As a general reply, I'd like to share a few things regarding the game. First of all, there is such a thing as spending not enough money in this deal because numbers is money, and, money is coverage. When you don't have enough coverage, your chances are lessened by that much more. When you really think about it, players are already starting out with only 1/2 the numbers which is why there's a $500 payout for $1.00 per number...that's 500 combinations people.There's a total of 1,000 possible combi
Aug 5, 2012, 10:06 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Steve Player SystemsReply
Man, I'm so glad that you can see right through all the hype! Most of these people are so hung up on what he's claimed to have won along with the supposed regularity of it. Give me a freakin' break!!! If it were that easy, Steve Player and Peter St. Pierre wouldn't be the only (2) people in the world making such money on Pick3/4! This is especially if he's marketing the exact same system that he's using to date. Surely, someone would've adapted his way of thinking and applied it the same way and
Jul 22, 2012, 8:11 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Man wins Fla. Lottery jackpot for 7th timeReply
SPARE CHANGE I think with any of these systems you have to spend a shipload of money to improve your chances. But remember the woman who just won the powerball jackpot in florida, she said she just bought one ticket. Unless she's lying, although it is possible. Every once in a while I hear of people stopping in a gas station to fill up their tanks and buy a few dollars worth of tickets on a whim, win millions, then there are people with systems who systematically lose more than they win, spe
Aug 18, 2010, 10:57 am - LotteryTechInc - Lottery News

Murphy's LawReply
and may still be, something(s) outside of our universe The current theories is our universe is expanding so if there is something outside , it was there before the big bang. The easiest explanation for the big bang and the universe is that there was some predecessor, whatever that might have been that caused it. Roger Penrose proposes that the universe undergoes an eternal cycle of expansion and contraction, with each cycle resulting in a new big bang and the creation of a new univ
Dec 29, 2023, 5:34 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Murphy's LawReply
Space and time were created by the Big Bang so there should be nothing beyond the universe. Our space and time, as well as laws of physics and probability, were created by the big bang. Or was possibly the end of a former universe The easiest explanation for the big bang and the universe is that there was some predecessor, whatever that might have been that caused it. That demands that there was, and may still be, something(s) outside of our universe. Despite its immense size our u
Dec 29, 2023, 1:28 am - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Has Steve Player gone out of business?Reply
Got an e-mail from them yesterday: ================================= Hello Nikki: We are still here. Steve Player has been working on computer updates and refining his mathematical algorithms. We expect to have his updates soon. You will be notified by email of any new systems as soon as they become available. Thank you for your continued patronage and Good Luck in all of your Lottery pursuits. Jodi Mae Customer Service - Opcom Inc.
Feb 25, 2023, 3:17 pm - Nikkicute - Lottery Discussion Forum