Search

California & Mega MillionsReply
No way will the odds revert. Not with Powerball increasing their matrix as well. Why is it unconstitutional for California to be in a multi-state game?
Aug 25, 2005, 12:47 pm - ryanm - Lottery Discussion Forum

Retro LottoReply
Once again, this game does not exist. It's not multi-state. It's not in-state. Do you believe everything you see?
Aug 23, 2005, 7:04 pm - JimmySand9 - Lottery Discussion Forum

CT Powerball?Reply
The news said that CT is going to stay with PB. If CT had left PB, I know that they'll join MM. Either way, CT wins by going to any multi-state jackpot game [PB or MM].
Aug 20, 2005, 4:29 pm - Just6ntlc - Jackpot Games Forum

Connecticut likely to stick with PowerballNews Story
Connecticut gaming officials are ready to approve changes to the Powerball lottery, including steeper odds and back-loaded jackpot payments, despite concerns raised last month by Gov. M. Jodi Rell.Paul A. Young, executive director of the Division of Special Revenue, wrote to the governor late last week, saying that the alternative is for Connecticut not to participate in the multi-state lottery game.Young also wrote that the changes, which already have been approved by the other participating st
Aug 16, 2005, 7:51 am - Todd - Lottery News

CT Powerball?
I was surfing the web when I came across this story for powerball on a yahoo search engine in the www.journalinquirer.com out of Manchester. It was talking about how the governer is going to have to let powerball make its changes or leave powerball and have no multi-state game. The other choice is to try and join mega millions with worse odds then powerball.
Aug 15, 2005, 8:12 pm - weshar75 - Jackpot Games Forum

Oklahoma Lottery to compare vendorsReply
I hope the lottery commission in Oklahoma plays MM or PB. I prefer PB because their sales are still dropping. I think they should join a multi-state game because of the huge jackpots.
Aug 9, 2005, 12:33 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery News

What's So Great About Lotto South?Reply
It sounds like some people just play the multi-state games when the jackpot reaches a specific threshold. Having more large jackpot games means they play more frequently. I don't want to see every over-million game be reduced to where the odds are 100 million to 1 or worse. I think a broad selection is desirable. How boring to just play for 100 million dollars and lose continuously... It's like playing with yourself, and never getting an arousal.
Aug 8, 2005, 1:01 pm - lchoro - Lottery Discussion Forum

Hooray! NC Gets a Lottery!Reply
I'm pretty sure it will take at least 6 months to get something in place. Yes, I would like to see the multi-state game too. I'll be glad if they just get anything. It is criminal the way we have to sneak and play the lottery.Tenaj
Aug 6, 2005, 10:37 am - Tenaj - Lottery Discussion Forum

Have you ever bought more than you shouldReply
I have found that I spent far more on state lotteries when they got a really high jackpot then MM or Powerball. By not playing multi-state games until it hits 300 million the odds of it rolling past that are incredably low since it has never happened. With state games you really never know what it can roll to. I can say that Washington and Oregon have both saved me money by switching to computer drawings since then I spend far less on any game.
Jul 30, 2005, 1:28 am - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum

Schwarzenegger to replace Calif. lottery directorReply
I know Arnold Schwarzenegger is named the Terminator. I hope that CA terminates Mega Millions by winning a lawsuit preventing them from playing a multi-state game. What do you think Todd of my story?
Jul 28, 2005, 10:54 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery News