Search

'Lottery Secrets" from the Cryptic Vault...Reply
Yes mazk, that's what it is all about. Kola makes that very clear in the beginning of the post. I find that most people don't have problems understanding the concepts of systems, methods, etc. however, the main problem is with basic reading skills.
Oct 30, 2006, 9:05 pm - LAVERNE MALONEY - Lottery Systems Forum

The Odds Are The RealityReply
Other than the winning numbers being a random event, you've just described a big problem with most systems, and with wheels in particular. Playing all of the combinations based on the numbers 1 through 7 guarantees a winning combination if all of the numbers drawn are from 1 to 7, but guarantees losing if even 1 number is outside that range. Picking 1% of the possible combinations gives you a 1% chance of having the winning combination regardless of the method used to pick the combinations. The
Jun 28, 2006, 5:35 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

SoniQ BOOM, a new P3/P4 system (Excel)Reply
Don't start thinking of retirement... ...well, not quite yet anyways. The triple digit system works just like the double digit system; both systems being the versions after we found the errors. So they are both only hitting very infrequently. But the good news is that the numbers the double digit system and the numbers the triple digit system hit on only overlap some. Meaning 1 system gives numbers the other system doesn't and vice versa. Another problem arises though one system may give you 2 n
Jan 6, 2006, 9:58 pm - Pogo - Lottery Systems Forum

Where have all the posts gone??Reply
We don't want to rule out V-tracs. There's lots of people who use and hit from that system. And I'm sure I'll hear from them in this thread. So before you start ---- CONGRATULATIONS!We just don't want it to dominate the forum. There's lots of other systems that people use and hit from as well. For a while there, when the lessons were going on you would have thought LP was a V-trac site. It totally dominated the threads. It's Ok if it can be done without overdoing it.Didn't we have this pr
Jan 6, 2006, 8:20 pm - Tenaj - Lottery Discussion Forum

Box Play
I am new to this site and live in western Canada I would like to know if anyone has a good pencil paper work out for box plays. I am interested in using 5-6 numbers for a box play. Playing 10 number combinations for a 5 number play or 20 combinations for a 6 number play ( no doubles ).I have always had a problem in getting that 3rd winning number in the 5 or 6 numbers that I pick for the box play.I have even tried pencil and paper systems to pick the non winners and play the rest but that did n
Nov 23, 2005, 11:41 am - evangeline - Pick 3 Forum

Dynamic or flexible system(s).Reply
the biggest problem I encountered when I tried to develop systems was that just when I thought I had identified a pattern or rule of thumb , the next few draws would undo it.my last effort was a combined attempt to meld a long-term system (full draw history) with a short-term system (last 3 draws) and that short term data provided the dynamic factor... not to any great result tho.you are most definitely right with the need for a dynamic system... my stat system proved to static even with a shor
Oct 16, 2005, 11:34 pm - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

Good lotto websitesReply
I agree, and I sympathize with this. The problem is that I live is a world were as soon as I say OK to one link, there are people just waiting for that to happen so they can post their horde of links. And most of those links will be to places looking to sell systems are other spam ads.And then when I delete those spam ads, the people who posted them write me nasty PMs saying Why can't I post my links, when you let Xyz post their links? And then I explain, but it's never good enough, and t
Oct 13, 2005, 8:27 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Wasted $300 on Steve Player Moneymap!Reply
People continue to buy systems and come to LP see if anyone else has bought the system and got it to work (meaning winning some money). The problem isn't that the system isn't working and picking numbers like it was designed to do, but that it's not picking winners which the confused customer thought it was designed to do. The person selling the system should had told them that they still have to be lucky enough to beat the odds to win something and that means playing more than a few lines at
Oct 8, 2005, 4:29 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Is it possible....Reply
I have a lottery program that I wrote in GWBasic and it high-lites the winning numbers in a list of combinations 20 lines per seconds or better, most programs can do even better. As long a the tickets are in the same order as the file there's no problem finding the winning tickets. A problem might exist if some one made a mistake while making out the tickets. As I said in an earlier post, some States require the tickets be made out by hand. but there are printing programs for those who plan to
Sep 13, 2005, 10:02 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is it possible....Reply
Some states have rules against using tickets not filled out by hand, but I don't know if they would enforce it once you won. It would be like letting an underage person lose his money playing the lottery and then refusing to pay because of his age if he won. There was a court case featured on 60 minutes in which a casino in Vegas did just that a couple of years ago.The laws not allowing any person or group to have exclusive use of a lottery terminal is probably easy to enforce as long as the s
Sep 13, 2005, 7:07 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum