Search

MATH 5/39: Stack47, Garyo1954, RL-RANDOMLOGIC VS Jimmy4164Reply
Hi, y'all! I've been reading your posts. Seems you folks have a handle on mathematics as it applies to lottery play. Have a question. Instead of swapping insults, etc, why don't you direct your energy to help LP members improve their personal systems. I have a workout I call 'Gap Strategy.' https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/197753 The link contains a basic description of the workout for Texas Pick 3. It has produced some wins in all the games, but no jackpots or signi
Mar 3, 2011, 1:26 pm - bobby623 - Mathematics Forum

David lee edwards television appearance.Reply
what sad is he didn't invest , people think millions will last them forever, we on this forum Should know it does Not......... if you spend like one, you better have yearly income of super rich person 40+ cash huh? he could of just invested a just half hes jackpot of say 20m in high divindend paying stock, and got over 2m in dividend payments for the rest of hes life a year , keeping him Super rich but nooooo, this guy had to spend millions to buy 18 freaking cars and lets not for
Feb 11, 2011, 6:06 am - joshuacloak - Lottery Discussion Forum

australian sat lotto , new division addedReply
here is a break down of prize distribution, note the div 5 3+b was the largest or equal largest paying div after1, now div 6 gets half that money. i think aus lottery liked a significant prize what ever you won, used ot be you would get arouind $20 for lowest prize, not bad on a 60c game, im guessing new lowest prize will be around half that. Division One 28.0 per cent Division Two 3.8 per cent Division Three 8.2 per cent Division Fou
Jan 15, 2011, 3:14 am - savagegoose - Jackpot Games Forum

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
Stack47 I think we only need to watch the local weather or look at the markets to see how statistics perform on any given day. The weather is considered by many to be random but only because they don't have enough data to make their predictions. You would think that with all the super computing power at there disposal, that statistics would do better then +/- 3 degrees as an accepted average which is more like +/- 5 for the norm. I missed a pick-6 jackpot the other day by 2 nu
Jan 10, 2011, 1:01 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

$355 MILLION: Mega Millions lottery jackpot second-biggest of all timeNews Story
By Todd Northrop What a week for Mega Millions multi-state lottery players! The lotteries have raised the official Mega Millions jackpot estimate for the second time in as many days to a knee-weakening $355 million for tonight's drawing. That's a $25 million increase just from yesterday. Likewise, the lump-sum cash option of tonight's jackpot is now $224.2 million an increase of $15.9 million from yesterday's estimate. And there's no telling how high the jackpot will become by the
Jan 4, 2011, 12:42 pm - Todd - Lottery News

Pure unadulterated baloney from Steve PlayerReply
Most interesting that you are telling me what this thread is about. Here's the OP, Steve Player in blue: ___________________________________________________________ I'm putting this in Discussions because it's not about the specifics of any system but about sleaze mail order system marketing. Steve Player fans need to read this. I got a snail mail today promoting his IL Little Lotto 5/39 GEO MATRIX . I'm sure he's sending this out to all states with a 5/39 game. From his websit
Dec 28, 2010, 6:01 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

New Tennessee Cash game - What's the Verdict?Reply
it does not go up fast its a total ripoff, i seen our old pack 5 go up MUCH faster then this higher old, bs game hell our old pack 5 game, had jackpots over 1 million before even, thro rare, this thing never been higher then the current 5400 it only goes up about 20k each draw, and sense it takes forever to get a higher it now went up 50k, then 40k, they don't invest much of the ticket sales into the jackpot AT ALL here a time thing to make it clear, we tn jsut got sold
Nov 22, 2010, 1:52 am - joshuacloak - Jackpot Games Forum

Winning at Lotto : Luck vs. IntelligenceReply
Statement: Being in the right place at the right time requires Luck and/or Intelligence. We are told that Alexander Graham Bell invented the Telephone, or Galileo invented the Telescope, or Thomas Edison invented the Light Bulb. The fact is that they didn t! They just happened to be in the Right place at the Right Time due to their Luck and/or Intelligence. Question: Do you always have to be Lucky to be in the right place at the right time? Question: Or could Intelligen
Nov 17, 2010, 3:58 pm - TeAl*888 - Lottery Discussion Forum

My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryReply
RL-RANDOMLOGIC, Finally! I succeeded! I succeeded in getting you to proclaim a few lottery truths. A couple of your points are technically arguable, but let's not quibble. ----You said,-------------------- Heres how I see things 1st. The lottery is designed to get people to play knowing full well that most wont win. 2nd. They know that the promise of winning big money will cause people to play to no end. 3rd. They design each game so that so that the only real winner is th
Sep 21, 2010, 11:27 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
Lucky Loser, A lot of what you said above is true. If more people play a particular way, then there will be more winners...STATISTICALLY. QP players cannot win no where near as consistent as PP's with correct math and properly arranged numbers. This is true, assuming you are buying more than 1 ticket. However, you're forgetting something very important. Let's say you're picking numbers for a Pick-5/43 game, and you have $5 to spend. Compare these 2 choices: Set A Set B
Aug 6, 2010, 1:46 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum