Search

CashpointReply
Hosni , Well ,,,,I finally broke down and went to the Steve Player site. That has to be one of the most frustrating sites I've ever been too. Gee I thought I was reading about his newest system right?..... nooooo yr 2ooo system then I wanted to see if I could buy it......noooooo that must be a secret too! Wow ....if I were trying to sell this stuff it would be a simple 1,2,3,4,5, step thing. Actually no more than 1,2,3, buy. There must be 10 pick three systems alone. Now that I've lost con
Nov 7, 2004, 8:23 pm - WIN D - Pick 3 Forum

Looking for Brilliant MindsReply
JKing,----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Oh, the shame of it all,*L*......it is .net instead of dot .comLSDEVMEMBERToday, Wednesday, July 28th, 2004, only! Lottery Systems Development Group Membership Drive!The cheapest way to get all Systems and Services!First come, first serve!Support the future projects!MembershipAll Forecasts all the time at no extra cost!All current programs that are available in
Jul 28, 2004, 9:51 pm - Webmaster L - Mathematics Forum

Lottoarchitect and LottosyncReply
Apagogeas:I don't really agree with your point of view that one 6/49 lottery compared to another is so different, even if the machine or whatever means are used to produce the draws are completely different !!If you determine the p value for let's say a group of 10 numbers randomly chosen to match 4 numbers drawn in a 6/49 lotto. You will see that every 6/49 lotto, nomatter what machine they use will obey (with a certain degree of freedom ofcourse) to the expectance of that p value. Then tell me
Jul 25, 2004, 12:52 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

New systems should be tested on 100 runsReply
Quote: Originally posted by Bertil on July 16, 2004 We should demand that any new or old system for Play 3 be tested on at least 10 runs before being posted here. I've seen soo many useless systems proposed, which have no chance of making money for anybody. Back up any claim with statistics. BertilI think most systems sellers who want to show proof the system works wait for a good run and show you that. If a system is simply a matter of making a choice to play say one of four groups, in
Jul 16, 2004, 8:56 pm - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

quick pick is betterReply
I agree with Pick-4_Master; you really can do much better than any machine, with only a minimal amount of effort.There are as many ways to pick lotto numbers as there are different combinations. Some people play birthdays, anniversaries or other dates that are special or significant to them (calendar numbers). The problem with this type of selection is that, while these numbers are significant in your life, they may not be significant to the machines spitting out the numbered balls.Other people
Jul 1, 2004, 6:06 pm - jim695 - Lottery Discussion Forum

New Jeresey couple wins huge Powerball lottery jackpotReply
Quote: Originally posted by qutgnt on May 19, 2004Yes and playing quick picks and such I have hit many lower tier prizes too, what is your point? Since every dvent is random systems are useless especially in games that pay out such a poor %. You are wasting your time and energy. I am sure you have hit many lower tier prizes using quick picks just as a lot of other people have. But how often have you won multiple lower tier prizes on the same ticket? My guess is that if you are using quick pick
May 19, 2004, 1:28 pm - whodeani - Lottery News

The Worlds Best System!Reply
Come on guys. We won't make any progress this way. Can't we try to keep this thread going and keep it focused on day to day systems that work. Systems that we know work already that we can share. NO Secret Systems! What's the good of talking about those? Nothing. Let's start with something simple like the, If you know one number system that everyone knows will hit about 10% of the time. If you make some adjustments to this system it can produce another 3 or 4 per cent. Now let
May 7, 2004, 4:21 pm - Prometheus1 - Lottery Systems Forum

Steve Player systems are Junk gimmicks
Are Steve Player Systems Junk like some have claimed? Seems like so many people hate steve player and claim that they tried a bunch of his systems and they dont work! If they do not work, then why has he been in business selling new systems for the past 25 years? Surely all his business cant be from suckers who only buy 1 time from him. He must have lots of loyal students who are repeat customers. I have his catalog, he says a few of his systems usually hit once every 7 days or once in 18 d
Mar 24, 2004, 4:17 am - pearl - Lottery Systems Forum

Kentucky Week of 3/8Reply
Okay, mglsr, here it is and I will do this for a few days. Blackapple has posted one workout for Kentucky so I won't repost that. He posted the the number workout for 558.I have gone back thru Kentucky for an early period from Feb 3 - Feb 12....and then I did the last 5 days.................here is what I found.From Feb 3-Feb 12, one digit was on the B (right side) on the bottom row (the last 2 digits in the workout on the B side), 7 times. It was on the left (side A), bottom, 1x, and it cont
Mar 11, 2004, 6:13 am - Sandy K - Pick 3 Forum

Prediction Discussion: Round 2Reply
the position concept seems to be headed in the right direction, until now, the best single-system performance I have backtested has been the 7th rundown of the julian date+number drawn, which produced 15 straight hits in 27 years... now I have uncovered one that caught 20 straights in 27 years... the significance is mind-boggling...IF you discount playing boxes and played using this system for $1 straight back in 1977 EVERY DAY until today ,you would be AHEAD by $798 (assuming PA's numbers and $
Feb 22, 2004, 6:25 am - hypersoniq - Pick 3 Forum