Search

I think Californians hate Super Lotto PlusReply
I think it has to do with the elected official of a state's Lottery Commission. They're usually Conservative Republicans and that's the problem! In Texas, we have Lotto Texas and it moves at the same slow rate and has been mired in corruptions when these, forever-changing officials comes in and try to increase the odds to make it harder to win (and one the elected Republican offical actually said that !!) to ensure more profits. When the citizens of Houston learn about the corruptions, Lot
Jun 30, 2008, 8:20 pm - Mega-ThinkTank - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do You Tell?Reply
Dear Just. . .you made me laugh--as a former teacher and then a former nurse--I was horrified to find some docs in the hospital in which I worked did not know how to adjust meds to patient's body weight and this was when those meds were specifically to be adjusted to their patient's body weight!! They would just say things like-- Let the pharmacy figure it out when they had written the med order in such a manner that the pharmacy was bound by law to fill what the doc had written and NOT to sugge
May 25, 2008, 10:50 am - AuntiePat - Lottery Discussion Forum

Confession/PollReply
The other night I went back to the store to buy a couple of Lotto tickets only because it's walking distance (although I drove because it was dark and we don't have sidewalks) Rather than spend the money on gas, it makes more sense to just buy more Lotto tickets to increase my chances.
May 24, 2008, 1:24 pm - justxploring - Jackpot Games Forum

How Many Past Draws Do You Look At?Reply
Has a lottery machine ever looked back? Does a bouncing ball care how many times a similar ball dropped through the chute? Do little plastic round things evaluate time and distance? Follow the example of R-E-A-L winners, not wanna be winner. Get a quick pick on the way to buying a loaf of bread and half-gallon of milk. You can increase your odds by having your IQ lowered. No certified genius has ever won a lottery. The last person who won a lottery with a system was ....... Hummm, never was o
May 22, 2008, 3:16 pm - MeFirstYouLast - Lottery Systems Forum

4 charged in killing of $250,000 lottery winner in OhioReply
I agree - for wanna be crooks and honest people. However, when the risk is over ruled by the return, then the harden guy would kill your dog in a heartbeat, and still take what they want. If the lights are on all the time, people no longer see the lights and ignore them. It is like the painting in the living room. Pretty soon you stop see it, because it is always there. As far as relying on neighbors goes, you best be freinds with them and they best be around 24/7. I hear car alarms multiple tim
May 22, 2008, 10:22 am - MeFirstYouLast - Lottery News

The Most important Lottery StatisticsReply
Hi, By eliminating numbers you increase your odds that you will hit. Mainly because you've reduced the amount of combinations. Examples in a Fantasy 5 game might consist of 1) numbers that have occured two times in a row or 2) numbers that have occured 3 times in the last 10 games or 3) numbers that have occured more than 8 times in the last 39 games. As always, there are examples where these things have occured, but it is a very low percentage of the time. Because cumulitive errors are mult
May 21, 2008, 10:59 am - JKING - Mathematics Forum

Michigan Fantasy 5 primary and subset last 10 draws JackpotismineReply
Okay Jackpotismine all 20 combos have been played for fantasy 5 for 5-17. So far the investment is $30.00 with $2.00 having been won to this point. Had Hans pull 20 #s for the MM draw last night using his system and had 3 #s in the system of 33 tickets. The saving grace was the MB i picked was 26 figured it had a good chance of hitting again has been pretty hot for MM and PB. Played it on every ticket so recouped my investment plus some. Will see how the increase of #s and tickets works on this
May 17, 2008, 3:12 pm - dld1961 - Pick 5 Forum

Straight In WcReply
Nice thought TC the triple v-trac return is near its average gibes us 877 also 7 gives us 49 ,2s 71,76,77 its getting dam close may increase betting
Apr 28, 2008, 11:36 pm - Amazing Grace - Pick 3 Forum

powerball changesReply
The last change to Powerball was jutified because there were too many jackpots being hit; thus the increase in ball numbers. To passify the players, they slightly raised the prizes and dreamed up that dumb annuity spread. Once again the passifier would be larger jackpots. The price for higher jackpots? More balls, thus greater odds. You can't get higher jackpots without higher odds. Baisic fact of life. I would like to see them be compatible with MegMillion's prize amounts, while keeping the pow
Apr 22, 2008, 7:32 pm - MeFirstYouLast - Lottery Discussion Forum

NY pick 3: 04/01/2008 thru 04/30/2008Reply
Good Morning all Posters !! Well, I figured out I am NO good with the ttt thing!! So, I am still trying ways to use this program I have, so here goes: Due Pairs out over 40+ draws: 00 22 40 43 50 55 84 88 99. OK, I have been studying my output and have noticed that other pairs that have been out 25+ draws fall also. The probability of these pairs falling INCREASE as they approach 40 but if not drawn can become a DUE PAIR!! Any mathmeticians out there?? My data base is 2+ years. Pairs out 25+/App
Apr 13, 2008, 11:53 am - sunkist - Pick 3 Forum