Search

Pennsylvania Lottery seeking volunteer witnesses on evening drawing showReply
Paying the witnesses does not solve any of the issues you stated. Also, you and I have no idea that the lottery does or doesn't vet witness to see if they have a criminal background. Maybe you can write to the lottery if that concerns you and let us all know what they say. The sentence you mentioned in your reply was a quotation from the PA Lottery's Executive Director, not something opined by me. Journalism states facts and quotes from actual participants. That is what this article does. I a
Oct 4, 2015, 10:23 pm - Todd - Lottery News

Those of You Giving Up Powerball
What are you playing instead? We only have one in-state game and the top prize is $52K taxes paid which works out to around $67K IIRC. Not worth a $2 bet IMHO since that isn't even a life-changing amount. So for now I'm planning on playing an extra Lucky for Life. I'm considering going over to Oregon to play their jackpot game that's worth a couple million right now. I'll continue to play Hot Lotto and Wild Card 2, but I won't increase my play on those. Will you be putting your Pow
Oct 4, 2015, 7:32 pm - HoLeeKau - Jackpot Games Forum

Lucky Streak - September Travelers - All StatesReply
Increase, I see my favorite in your travelers!!! I hope this month produces many winners for you. Thanks for posting have an Incredible month
Sep 5, 2015, 8:56 am - plshelpme - Pick 3 Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Your next goal should be to speed up the training. Increase calculating speed with X100. Ever heard of CUDA? Everyone with a NVIDIA card on their PC got a hidden supercomputer which is unused. The same goes for ATI/AMD Radeon, but they use a different system. Read more here: CUDA NVIDIA cuDNN GPU Accelerated Deep Learning
Aug 29, 2015, 9:34 am - MillionsWanted - Mathematics Forum

marcie and easymoney has something to share**Reply
Sure I will increase hold on...Ok 5 32 4902 775866 16082015
Aug 16, 2015, 12:19 pm - marcie - Mystical Forum

Targets for Pick3Reply
Ironic, I use digits out, count, and get the key digits 91-94%, then compare to BA digit out method. when LDR selection is correct, then keys reduct to 10 or less main plays using BA Best Pairs is around 56% for WA and it helps. I adjusted to increase the % to around 78% The test now is your pair reduct that can achieve one or two finals which you are doing quite well This is interesting jeebsxx, and job well done
Aug 15, 2015, 2:11 pm - Makenmo - Lottery Systems Forum

How Random is Random?Reply
#1 There is no way to accurately predict the winning set. #2 Playing smarter will however increase the lower level prizes and maybe land you a JP. #3 Winning on a QP = Dumb luck or Divine interaction. RL
Aug 2, 2015, 10:21 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Systems Forum

Would you stop playing the lottery if you were restricted to Quick Picks?Reply
You seem to be missing the point. If a system actually worked the lottery would pay out more than probability suggests, and they would therefore pay out more than they budgeted for. Since systems don't work the lottery safely relies on the consistent profits guaranteed by probability instead of worrying about a system presenting an obstacle. The Masachusetts game never offered anybody a better chance of winning. It just moved money from the jackpot prize pool to the lesser prizes. That allowe
Jul 16, 2015, 3:19 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball Matrix Change - April 15, 2015Reply
Thanks again for the info. Lotto Metro. Everyone here with a system or believes that there can be a system for a 5 + 1 game needs to make this their mantra: MUSL projects that the change will result in an increase to revenues of more than 40% versus current trends. They also expect average hit jackpots to be just over $300 million with 10-11 hits per year Silver Lion, If everyone on LP boycotted PB do you really think the MUSL would feel it?
Jun 27, 2015, 3:08 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

How To Validate Or Discount Any System With The 'Bankroll' Litmus Test
Okay, rather than go through all the rigmarole again with all the details, I'm simply going to refer those interested in this study back to the original link and test. This actually took place, coincidentally, about a year ago this same month. The test was to apply the total cost to run a set of combos for a given amount of days...in this case, (10) ten days. I opted to apply the least cost which was the 3-way boxed hit for the $80 payout. Anything more, in terms of additional hits, would simply
Jun 22, 2015, 12:33 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Systems Forum