Search

LottoSync needs cloning + development.Reply
To a very great extent, but not completely, the random string is cut off from one draw to the next, so I am very surprised that LottoSync can predict right 2 to 3 balls on 10 out of 6.His reasoning would be more correct or right on a continuos or uninterupted random probability string.For example: They draw out 6 balls out of 42 and if his software would use those 6 balls for prediction and predicts 10 balls, if they had drawed out 16 balls instead of 6 the last 10 balls might had been the same
Oct 22, 2005, 11:59 am - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

LottosyncReply
The Lottosync web site remains, therefore an upgrade remains possible as well. BobP
Jul 25, 2005, 12:40 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

has anyone ever won big using a GH systemReply
I guess that maybe there is no more LottoSyncMan, maybe not untill Lottosync 1.8 gets released, if ever (I would not hold my breath waiting for it).
Jun 20, 2005, 10:37 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

What prize is Lottosync aimed at?
I've read a lot of posts about Guru's Lottosync program and am really wondering what the big deal is. I'm not a 100% certain but it seems to me that the software is aimed at the 3 number prizes in a lottery, ie. 3/6 prize. So let's see if I go it right, he says that the last 3 draws are the only ones that matter to his prediction software, correct? Now, 3 out of 6 numbers come up about 29% of the time in a 6/49 game from the last 3 draws. You can check this out with Ion Salui's MDIEDIT softw
Mar 1, 2005, 4:44 pm - xavier102772 - Lottery Systems Forum

Even a better lottosync 1.8 ??Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 17, 2005Hi all,After a long wait, I finally found some hours to further develop lottosync 1.8While analysing some test results, I stumbled upon something new that might make lottosync even better. If my feelings are correct about this, it may even bring us to a point of accuracy that is scary.I would like to stress the words might and may because it isn't tested in the actual engine yet. It's only in my head at the moment, but I have a feeling this
Feb 26, 2005, 6:43 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum

canada 6/49 prediction using lottosync 1.Reply
Oooooh, ahhhhhh.....LottoSync is bad bad. I believe it got one number.
Feb 23, 2005, 3:14 pm - xavier102772 - Lottery Systems Forum

Even a better lottosync 1.8 ??Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 17, 2005Hi all,After a long wait, I finally found some hours to further develop lottosync 1.8While analysing some test results, I stumbled upon something new that might make lottosync even better. If my feelings are correct about this, it may even bring us to a point of accuracy that is scary.I would like to stress the words might and may because it isn't tested in the actual engine yet. It's only in my head at the moment, but I have a feeling this
Feb 17, 2005, 7:37 pm - vick - Lottery Systems Forum

canada 6/49 prediction for sat feb 5/04Reply
And good luck to Lottosync and you.I see it has selected higher numbers this time.Do you use a 10 number system with a 3if3 guarantee?
Feb 5, 2005, 11:50 am - MillionsWanted - Lottery Systems Forum

Hi GURU, what's the 1.8 lottosynch StatusReply
I sure wish that I had the new LottoSync 1.8 already, that would start the new year much better now that I am getting into the jackpot games and a little bit away from the pick 3.I guess that I will have to develop my own jackpot game techniques and I am finally begining to do so after thinking about doing so for a while, I am developing some very unique filters, I don't know if anybody has ever thought or used them before, first I am developing my own stuff and then I will look around to see wh
Jan 23, 2005, 9:20 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

Gail Howards booksReply
I'm not that close to buying a wheel system, but LottoSync looks good. No offense.
Jan 23, 2005, 1:44 am - Maverick - Lottery Discussion Forum