Search

Euro Millions Lottery Sparks Buying Frenzy With $224 Million Top PrizeReply
Quote: Originally posted by Chewie on February 3, 2006 You skeptics about PTS always ask if there is proof if they will pay off. For PTS, prove to me they have never paid off on a jackpot. You remind me of the anti-gun crowd asking if anything I own is worth a persons life. The thief has to ask himself, is what I own worth his life. If you're too gutless to shoot some one, don't own a gun. If you're afraid to gamble, stay away from PTS. The more of you who live in fear, the better my chanc
Feb 4, 2006, 2:53 am - justxploring - Lottery News

Hoosier Lottery...worse than you thought!Reply
Welcome to LP.com, Uncle Jim, and thanks for an informative post.Here's something you might find interesting:IC 4-30-3-5 Commission StudiesSec. 5 The Commission shall make a continuous study of the following:(1) The lottery, in order to ascertain any amendments necessary to this article, or to rules adopted under this article that could prevent any abuses in the administration of the lottery.(2) The operation and administration of similar lottery laws in other states and of federal laws that
Dec 29, 2005, 4:47 pm - jim695 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Texas Lottery jackpot mess has critics enragedNews Story
Editor's Note: The following opinion article is not necessarily the opinion of Lottery Post, but is presented to illustrate how the latest Texas Lottery gaffe has fueled the fires of long-time critics of the Texas Lottery Commission (TLC). The article is written by Ken Rodriguez of the San Antonio Express-News.Ken Rodriguez: How Texas lottery advertised make-believe payoff for suckersThe sleight-of-hand Texas Lottery Commission has done it again. On Wednesday, the commission turned the Texas Lo
Jun 14, 2005, 11:30 am - Todd - Lottery News

$290 MILLION:" Mega Millions lottery jackpot increasedReply
Quote: Originally posted by tg636 on July 02, 2004If you show me some good evidence that you could make the amount of the annuity by investing the lump sum, I would be a believer. Assuming taxes get 35% of the lump sum and 5% of what's left goes to spending and enjoying your money, then you start off down 40%. So you have to make that 40% back just be get back to where the state starts off investing the annuity. The state takes the same lump sum and invests it without having to pay the 35% tax
Jul 2, 2004, 11:13 pm - whodeani - Lottery News

US Powerball multi-state lottery game expanding to the UKReply
After reading the article a few more times very carefully here is what I get from the article: Everything in the article above the following section is yadda, yadda, yadda from the PB Lottery until some solid information (maybe subject to change?) comes along. US state lotteries and the UK National Lottery will pool funds only for the Powerball jackpot, not lower-tier prizes. Tickets purchased in the UK will contribute the same fixed US dollar amount per play to the jackpot pool as ticke
Apr 16, 2026, 12:59 pm - IAmABadOne - Lottery News

Cycles - Interesting NumbersReply
Right... where to begin. Hyperdimension posted a link to an article in another post here called how could the computer find patterns in a lottery? I'm not allowed to do links so go find it and have a look. I reply posted to him there but include a copy here for anyone's interest. Essentially what I read in the article that HD linked completely parallels to my methods and approach, I'm no mathematics pro so have a lot to learn about what they are developing and to draw from their
Nov 1, 2018, 12:10 am - Hydromaln7 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Hoosier Leadership and Basic Math...
Below is an article I found yesterday on IndyStar.com. In order to appreciate the gravity of the situation, I'll have to give you some background information on how this came about. Governor Mitch Daniels and our state legislature decided to lease our toll road to a foreign company for seventy-five years in return for a one-time payment of $3.85 billion dollars. Over 60% of the citizens of Indiana were opposed to this deal, but they went ahead and pushed it through anyway, in a late-night
Mar 18, 2006, 10:36 pm - jim695 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Arizona Lottery delays expiration date of $12.8 million jackpot-winning ticket in legal battleReply
It belongs to the store. According to the article, the customer declined the printed ticket and Arizona lottery rules states, that when that happens the retailer gets to keep the ticket, provided he does not resell it. The Manager, fraudulently purchased the ticket because he knew it was a winner. Who in their right mind would purchase a day old lottery ticket?
May 21, 2026, 8:02 pm - Scoommo - Lottery News

Arizona Lottery delays expiration date of $12.8 million jackpot-winning ticket in legal battleReply
*The report said the owner of the ticket declined it, more like ( forgot ) it at the store. It's why Bank of America is now involved. * According to the article, the ticket was purchased using a debit card. Seems the purchase was legitimate and Circle K wants the money going to the original purchaser, just not Gawlitza.
May 21, 2026, 1:41 pm - noise-gate - Lottery News

Something is rotten in the state of MichiganReply
Based on the article it seems that the person who won, won in May 2025 and was waiting nearly a year to cash it in. I don't know what the time limit is on cashing in those winning tickets but having a winning ticket collecting dust for 1 year or being squished in your wallet for a long period of time will probably wear it down.... Additionally you are even more correct...this winning ticket makes EZ match look like even more of a scam!
May 15, 2026, 1:36 am - DarkThunder - Lottery Discussion Forum