Search

Mega Tuesday 10/28/2003Reply
well that would depend on what definition of tactician you are looking for.if you mean do i plan my next move or choose my words carefully. you bet i do.if you mean do i attempt to compile mathematical advantages in order to win the lottery? HECK NO. don't need to. waste of time for me. too busy writing jokes. besides i only have a high school education and i am a mathematical NON genius. i practice the lottery in scientific terms.
Nov 2, 2003, 6:20 am - visiondude - Jackpot Games Forum

MasterMind-3 ReviewReply
These are the Pick-3 draws from across the country for Sat Oct 25, 03 they may help decide what should be filtered and what not.AZ 985 highBC 467 defaultCA 213 LowCA 078 defaultCT 864 evenDC 809 defaultDC 740 defaultDE 478 defaultDE 691 defaultFL 840 evenGA 207 defaultGA 528 defaultID 399 doubles oddIA 977 high doubles oddIL 977 high doubles oddIA 937 oddIL 937 oddIN 627 defaultIN 248 evenKA 099 doublesKY 174 defaultKY 642 evenLA 427 defaultMD 011 low doublesMD 463 defaultMI 526 defaultMI 315 o
Oct 25, 2003, 10:58 pm - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

Which statistics are important?Reply
I've EXPLAINED many times how you can try and TRAP the winning numbers instead of trying to PREDICT them.I've done it,not enough to make a living off of but enough to keep me from buying quick-picks.There's really nothing to prove because it may not work for everyone but it has worked for me so just because you can't do it doesn't mean it can't be done.It's a strategy if it didn't WORK AT ALL I wouldn't waste my time using it so if I'm using it then obviously there is a reason for that.And to be
Sep 21, 2003, 4:25 pm - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
In Florida a lot of Winners say that they have been playing the same numbers or buying quick-picks for the past 5 to 10 yrs it's always somewhere in between that time.Your right about players winning on the first try of buying a quick-pick but it doesn't happen as often as you might think.And yes they also win in less than 5 yrs but I'm quite sure they are not the majority on average it's somewhere between 4 and 7 yrs playing the same numbers or quick-picks.I read as well and these are the figur
Sep 15, 2003, 8:50 am - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
Most systems are based on some criteria or trackable variables. The casino games are based on a specific randomization system and yet the casinos have not been cracked. Now this snycro system is a totally random system? There seems to be some contradiction because even randomizer systems require variables . You mentioned intervals and repeats . Most of the systems that are not randomizers will base results on similar factors. So what makes your system any better than the quick-pick of letter
Sep 5, 2003, 12:13 pm - WILLSELL - Lottery Systems Forum

Quick-Pick Number StrategyReply
Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on August 30, 2003From what I see my time is spent just as wisely as yours the only difference is I spend more money but I have won more times than you have buying quick-picks so I think I'll stick to what works best for me. ever hear my fishing story about how my friends would always catch a bunch of little fish but i was patient and ALWAYS caught the biggest fish when ever we fished together? they put preference of quantity over quality a
Aug 30, 2003, 7:34 pm - visiondude - Lottery Systems Forum

Quick-Pick Number StrategyReply
It doesn't have to be 20 it could be as little as 5 and if buying 20 quick-picks at 1 store doesn't work then try 20 tickets at 20 different stores.If a player doesn't have the time or gas then just do 5 tickets at 5 different stores.The only reason I brought it up was because many people buy a bunch of tickets at there favorite location with no luck and even though the tickets are generated randomly some machines seem to do better than others.So the idea was to spread your tickets among differe
Aug 28, 2003, 5:53 pm - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

Body Guards Reply
CHIEF,since jean claude van dam is a drunk, jackie chan has arthiritis and is old, chuck norris is relegated to infomercials and AHNULD swarzeneggar is tied up at the moment while running for govenor of california, my pick would be THE ROCK. actually i would throw everybody off by hiring mini-me (verne troyer). they would be laughing so hard that i could make a quick get away.actually #2, after claiming anonymously, i am hoping that my multiple trusts will allow me the ability to remain
Aug 18, 2003, 3:33 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

just some info on softwareReply
Also you need to take in consideration that a lot of quick-pick players sometimes spend $50 or more on themweekly!! so that adds up to way more than I've ever spent on software.I've seen players here in Miami shellout $80-$100 on quick-picks and only win $5 or $10 because I would see that same person again the following day or week cashing there tickets and buying more.Not a very good investment in my opinion letting the Lottery Commision select your numbers for you from a machine they purchased
Jul 23, 2003, 9:30 am - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

Seeing patterns where none existReply
Prometheus said that the probability of tossing 30 Heads in a row was over 3 Billion to one. According to T.C. if he showed up on the 29th. toss he would buy a quick- pick, and have just a good a chance as anyone. Most of the people on this forum have a real hard time understanding that. Yes, the odds on the 29th toss are still Fifty- percent, and the odds are the same a million tosses from now, still fifty percent but that 30th toss is no fifty-per cent proposition bet. The chances are, shall
Jul 13, 2003, 6:44 pm - WIN D - Lottery Discussion Forum