Search

Proposal: New Component for Lottery Report CardReply
I totally agree. That's one of the big strikes against computerized drawings. It is impossible to show an actual computerized drawing take place, which is one of the reasons outlined in the Petition showing why computerized drawings are so bad.
Dec 2, 2006, 2:04 am - Todd - Suggestions Forum

My support for MUSL Hot Lotto has fadedReply
I wished that all games get computerized except for CA SLP, MM, and PB. However, I don't like the computerized drawings manipulate and take advantage of everyone. Computerized drawings may mean that a jackpot winner will occur and less people playing it.
Feb 17, 2006, 6:07 pm - Just6ntlc - Jackpot Games Forum

My support for MUSL Hot Lotto has fadedReply
I'm not happy that Hot Lotto went to computerized drawings. Yesterday, I went to MUSL Hot Lotto video Archive of the draws, after 6/1/05, it never showed the video. The ball machines in Hot Lotto was fair enough for me to support the ball drawings, not computerized.
Feb 11, 2006, 12:03 pm - Just6ntlc - Jackpot Games Forum

if your state switched would you play?Reply
My vote is a definite no. I don't trust the computerized drawings because there would be more jackpot winners and less interest. I wished that CA had eliminated all the computerized drawings.
Feb 10, 2006, 2:09 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery Discussion Forum

a reason to be concerned...computer drawsReply
I don't think either of the multi-state games will go to computerized drawings because some States may be willing to tell their own citizens that RNG BS but they aren't dumb enough to believe it themselves. Besides, how would anyone explain having drawings to give away $300M plus jackpots need to be computerized to save few dollars.
Feb 9, 2006, 1:15 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Calif. lottery sales up 7 percentReply
I agree with you CASH Only on CA SLP being ball drawn. I wished that CA eliminated all of the computerized drawings on the rest of their lotto games. Eliminating computerized drawings makes sales better and each of the games would be more fair.
Feb 8, 2006, 3:22 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery News

Louisiana Lottery - Revamped websiteReply
Forget about ending computerized drawings. They need to lower the minimum purchase age! Computerized drawings are bad, yes, but there are more important things than even that!
Feb 5, 2006, 1:14 am - JimmySand9 - Lottery Discussion Forum

gravity machine or computer??Reply
The reason we don't like computerized drawings has nothing to do with throwing off patterns or any kind of prediction mumbo-jumbo. We don't like computerized drawings because they're done under closed doors, and even if the person operating the computer is the most honest person ever, he can't see what's going on in the computer and whether or not it's doing what it's supposed to. There's no transparency.
Feb 4, 2006, 8:45 pm - JimmySand9 - Lottery Discussion Forum

a law banning all computerized drawings
after the fiasco in kansas where the same pick 3 number comes up three days in a row.don't this set a good example that computerized draws don't work???
Dec 23, 2005, 3:42 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

N.C. Lottery plans expensive personnel movesReply
With all the money they are spending on personnel, they better not skimp when it comes time to buy drawing machines. People will be outraged if the N.C. Lottery tries to plead poverty and cuts a few dollars to go with computerized drawings.They think the recent scandals were bad? Just wait and see what happens if they try to put those terrible computerized drawings in place.
Dec 9, 2005, 7:41 am - Todd - Lottery News