Search

MD's Powerball Challenge 10/12Reply
Final recap Powerball 10/12: 4-9-18-51-54 + 10Littlemanjen 2+1RJOH 2+1Bks2 2+1Delores247 1+1Aye 2+0Jadelottery 2+0Maddog 2+0Jag331 2+0Litebets 2+0Those at 1+0, Anonymous,Barristaexp. No moonie 's________________________________________________Top honors this draw goes to Littlemanj
Oct 13, 2005, 4:35 pm - MADDOG10 - Jackpot Games Forum

Pick 4 Combinations Generator? ?Reply
If you can get a copy of Maybell QuikPick, it will do it too. It was a free program that some of the old members of Maybell may still have a copy of.RJOh
Oct 12, 2005, 10:49 am - RJOh - Pick 4 Forum

Should criminals collect jackpots?Reply
Rjoh, you are right. The original question did say criminals and not killers. Substitute killers with thieves or rapist and all other criminals who commit crimes or felonies and my point remains the same.I guess there would be nothing we could do if a felon won the lottery and gave his 100 million winnings to a friend or family member, expecting to be cut in on his share of the winnings. This criminal would really have to have some amazing and loyal friends or relatives.
Oct 9, 2005, 9:26 am - DirtyWrat - Lottery Discussion Forum

Maddogs Powerball Challenge 10/8Reply
final results Powerball 10/8: 26-31-35-46-50 + 28Ayenowitall 3+0Bellyache 3+0RJOH 3+0Lottotto 2+1Delores247 2+1Barristaexpress 1+1The rest of us at 2+0, 1+0, and 0+0 are still searching.Top honors this draw goes to Lottotto and Delores247 with their 2+1 callsRunners-up goes to Ayenowitall, Bellyache, and RJOH with their 3+0 callsMention goes to Barristaexpress with the 1+1 call.Congrats to everyone...!
Oct 8, 2005, 11:35 pm - MADDOG10 - Jackpot Games Forum

Should criminals collect jackpots?Reply
Would that limitation also apply to immediate family members, lottery pools or anyone else who might share their winnings with a convicted felons? It's a simple matter for a felon to have a family member or friend claim the winnings and share it with him.The original question included all criminals not just killers which would include almost anyone who have done time in jail.RJOh
Oct 8, 2005, 7:30 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Should criminals collect jackpots?Reply
I stand by what I said, if a state doesn't want to pay certain people their winnings then it shouldn't accept their money to play. Questioning whether they should pay up after a person wins would make their lottery like a scam.RJOh
Oct 8, 2005, 6:37 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Maddogs "Powerball Challenge" 10/5Reply
That's funny RJOh. LOL. It's ok Jack. We all make mistakes. =)
Oct 6, 2005, 9:06 pm - bellyache - Jackpot Games Forum

Final Ohio Super Lotto Plus drawing SaturdayReply
The new Lot'O Play which replaces SLP should be more profitable for the state.SLP tickets cost $1 - LOP cost $2SLP jackpot started at $4M - LOP jackpot starts at $1MSLP jackpot roll over min. was $1M - LOP jackpot min. roll over is $100KSLP odds of winning jackpot are 1:13.9M per $1 ticket - LOP odds are 1:6.3M per $2 ticketSLP players could pick all their numbers - LOP players can pick one of 5 lines of numbers.LOP should have more smaller prize winners than SLP had.Good luck Ohioplayers.RJOh
Oct 6, 2005, 12:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery News

Should criminals collect jackpots?Reply
acronym007 wrote: My question lines more so with ethical issues. I just don't think people are very ethical when it comes to imposing their values on others. Many people are just plain jealous of the people who win lotteries jackpots because they think it's unearned money. They will always come up with some so called ethical BS why some people should have that kind of money, they just can't stand someone being so lucky. RJOh
Oct 5, 2005, 11:18 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Should criminals collect jackpots?Reply
acroym007,I agree, the States can impose such rules. Some years back Ohio had a rule that a lottery ticket could only collect an amount equal to a $20M annuity regardless of the jackpot size. When their sales went down, they eliminated that rule, but their sales never came back to the level they were before that rule and their lottery jackpots are a lot smaller these days.RJOh
Oct 5, 2005, 9:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum