- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 5:14 pm
You last visited
June 21, 2026, 4:43 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
Lottery tax question...
If you want to win $65 million after taxes than you need to be the sole winner of a $200 million annuity jackpot.
Feb 25, 2014, 3:56 pm - Drenick1 - Lottery Discussion Forum
$330 MILLION: Powerball jackpot quickly ramping up
Todd I've always been a fan of megamillions even when they recently changed the matrix. But when they went to a 29 year annuity, that was the first time I hated a change in megamillions. But I still figured if thats how powerball pays their annuity then both games were still sort of equal to me. But as one member just reminded me on this thread, pb is paying about 57% cv of the jp. I figured mm must be a similar number and to my disgust I noticed it's only paying 54% and change. Todd can u expla
Feb 15, 2014, 9:02 am - peppy007 - Lottery News
$330 MILLION: Powerball jackpot quickly ramping up
Well for $4,412,950 net first annuity payment for the state of Washington, I'm in. We have no state tax. Ain't that break yar heart 49ers??
Annuity or lump sum? Get it started guys. It's that time again.
Feb 14, 2014, 1:24 pm - One-Day - Lottery News
Why Do You Think Lottery Winners Always Take The Cash Option?
You realize that a wealth tax, whether it's a one time thing or an annual tax, will take more from a lump sum than from the annuity payments, right?
That is a rather strange question. I will attempt to be as simplistic as possible so I don't confuse you.
Lump sum amounts are always much larger than an annuity payment that is spread out over 30 years.
An additional tax whether it is a 3.8% Obamacare tax or 1.5% annual wealth tax (currently assessed in France) will always be a larg
Feb 14, 2014, 10:24 am - Jill34786 - Lottery Discussion Forum
Why Do You Think Lottery Winners Always Take The Cash Option?
You realize that a wealth tax, whether it's a one time thing or an annual tax, will take more from a lump sum than from the annuity payments, right?
Feb 14, 2014, 4:41 am - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum
if PB/MM was changed from lump sum to annuity only going forward- would you still play?
Absolutely, I'm still undecided about if I would take the cash option or annuity now. I guess it depends on how much.
Feb 13, 2014, 3:43 pm - Mattapan - Lottery Discussion Forum
Why Do You Think Lottery Winners Always Take The Cash Option?
Unless the plan is to keep your money in a safe, never in an interest-yielding bank account and never to invest in anything, to simply live on the jackpot amount won, that would be the only time the annuity would be a better option than the cv.
That could very well be the only logical reason for taking the annuity.
Feb 13, 2014, 3:11 pm - Jill34786 - Lottery Discussion Forum
Why Do You Think Lottery Winners Always Take The Cash Option?
Another good point. I'd have been shocked if Gloria took the annuity.
Feb 12, 2014, 7:04 am - Teddi - Lottery Discussion Forum
is there any scenario where you take annual payments over the Lump sum?
NO ANNUITY----------Cash Only....Don't trust the federal government one bit to keep the tax level at/near 39.6 % over the next 30 years.
Feb 5, 2014, 5:21 pm - CDanaT - Lottery Discussion Forum
The Power Play multiplier returns to Powerball
... my dream potential is MUCH higher (and farther reaching) with the solo row PB and MM w/multiplier ticket vs. scratch-offs purchases each week.
Plus, the 2nd prize MM and PB isn't annuity payoff ... unlike MOST of the expensive 1st prize annuity scratch-off tickets.
Jan 23, 2014, 12:07 am - HaveABall - Lottery News
