Search

LotteryReply
The odds of winning are the same regardless of the jackpot size. There are clubs like that already and the people who run them expect a good fee for their efforts and the members don't have any input except their money which is expected to be deposited in advance of the club being formed. When such clubs are formed among friends, somebody is expected to do a lot of work for nothing and the club members can't be depended on to come up with their money on time.RJOh
Jun 7, 2005, 9:24 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Are Secrets Really Worth Keeping?Reply
Badger,Your idea of a system that works consistently for jackpot games is different than mine. A system that could come close to a big win 20-25% of the time and maybe hit a major jackpot once every two years was what I had in mind. No pattern that is affordable to cover is going to repeat ever draw but there may be patterns that happen 20-25% of the time that can be covered at an affordable cost. That's the kind of system that I've been looking for. RJOh
Jun 7, 2005, 9:00 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

LotteryReply
If you ever find a lottery system that makes money or even pays for itself, you won't have to worry about finding investors, if fact there are people who would buy that system and do all the investing themselves.RJOh
Jun 7, 2005, 4:30 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Filter/Reduction ChoicesReply
Why would you include numbers in your combinations that you intended to eliminate later with a filter? Wouldn't it be easier to eliminate those numbers from the pool of numbers before creating your combinations? RJOh
Jun 7, 2005, 6:35 am - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

jack whittakerReply
Jack is old news and he was only an embarrassment to the people who loved him, none of which have ever posted anything about him at LP. RJOh
Jun 6, 2005, 12:45 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Has Anyone Heard of This System??Reply
I keep reading about these winning systems that cost too much to play. Does such a system exist? It seems to me if a system constantly wins more money than it cost to play then it could never be too costly to play. RJOh
Jun 6, 2005, 1:50 am - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Jackpot lottery ticket: dying man's final giftReply
I've always had a vision of winning the jackpot whenever I've bought lottery tickets, unfortunately it hasn't happen. If I ever do win the jackpot it will still be true and I won't remember all the times it wasn't true.RJOh
Jun 5, 2005, 6:04 pm - RJOh - Lottery News

Could you see a day...Reply
I don't really care what they charge for a ticket as long as I get a chance to win per dollar spent. Ohio has always charged a dollar per ticket even when they sold 2 chances to win per ticket for a bigger jackpots (I guess 50 cent per ticket was too much troule). Lottery players aren't very smart but I doubt if most would be willing to pay $2 for a chance to win the same prize that now cost $1 per chance to win.RJOh
Jun 5, 2005, 12:35 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

40% is not enough!Reply
I think CASH Only was referring to the percent of tickets sales that goes toward prize money, not the amount of taxes that has to be paid on the prizes. To me a jackpot of $20M is the same regardless of the number of tickets sold to create the jackpot. $50M or $75M in tickets sales makes no difference to me if I'm willing to buy a ticket.RJOh
Jun 5, 2005, 12:14 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Ohio RC5 Sat. 6/4/05Reply
I've been tuning this simple system for MegaMillions, SuperLottoPlus and Rolling Cash5. The trouble is it's tuned for the ways the numbers come up 30-40% of the time so 60-70% of the time it's not going to work but hopefully when it does work it will make up for all the time it didn't. I back tested it on the drawings that did come up as expected and it still wasn't a sure match 3 or better in 20 lines.RJOh
Jun 4, 2005, 9:46 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum