Search

COMPUTERIZED DRAWING GLITCH STRIKES ARIZONA LOTTERYReply
On Aug. 5, the Arizona Lottery discovered there was an issue in the Pick 3 programming code that prevented the numbers eight and nine from being drawn in certain positions between June 10 and Aug. 3. The drawing would be random if they used a deck of cards and used ace through ten from three suits. Hearts are the first digit, Diamond the second, and Spades the third, shuffle the three piles individually and draw one card from each. It's the same simple principle other lotteries use with bal
Aug 21, 2013, 2:05 pm - Stack47 - Lottery News

The Science Of BallcologyReply
Ok althought G5 assessment was point on, i should have ignored it, and not thrown in the 3 so fast as a long skip, and i should have focused on the 0 1 2 5 or 0 1 3 4 but you really never can be sure, so its not always good to judge your self when you miss. Just stick to it. The one long shot was the 29 which was not really on my radar. I managed to pick up one free play in five games with the 15 19,(which is nothing to brag about) and i had a card filling in error somewhere, or I grabbed the wr
Oct 23, 2012, 11:37 pm - LottoBoner - Mystical Forum

Mega-millions settings and suggestions for Digit Master.Reply
Hi all New DM version / update is now ready for download. link on page 1 of this thread Just wanted to let everyone know that the latest version is now ready for download, This new version has a few extra tools and is the same as the pool members are using. The RAC option had an error and I am not sure when or how the error occured but those that use it should download the newest version. The var-3 in the RAC control panel was not being calculated correctly which gr
Sep 18, 2012, 7:13 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Jackpot Games Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
Hi, Going back to my previous example: 0 0 0% 1 8 1.5% 2 46 8.7% 3 155 29.6% 4 207 39.5% 5 108 20.6% To only use the top occurring numbers, takes you out of a winning position too much of the time, reguardless of the best subsets within that range. If I were to utilize the 80/20 rule it would be to filter out all combination that don't have at least 3 of the top identified numbers. That way there would only be a 10.2% error. Using that approach (10% or less), the ru
Aug 5, 2011, 3:22 pm - JKING - Mathematics Forum

Atheist converts after mock prayer to win $1M lottery is answeredReply
This post has been specially prepared for rdgrnr, who apparently has a mouse with a malfunctioing left button that won't allow him to click on links that might prove too challenging for him. But since he may not be beyond hope, I've pasted some of the text from an article discussing the Bible below. Who knows, since a high bandwidth connection is not necessary, he may just absorb some of it before his attention deficit kicks in. Those with fully functioning mice can click here: Some Reasons W
Jul 10, 2011, 10:50 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery News

Explain this anomallyReply
Thanks for all of the input, guys. It IS appreciated. However, I think the actual question (or at least the spirit of it) has gotten lost. It is not that I WANT to track the two matrices, merely that if I give it the entire 19 years worth it will track it as though it is one matrix (obvious, right?) To be sure, the most accurate pool of draws is the post-Jan09. No question about that. Logically, that should be the only choice as using the larger, combined, pool would skew things away
Jun 23, 2011, 5:11 pm - Simon Templar - Lottery Systems Forum

Computer Draws ? Outliers or just broken software?Reply
Well,.. you re looking at it all like your definition of what is normal could be easily defined. You are not going down some goat trail, you are on strait approach: This is the way we look at statistics. Because, blah, blah blah. this is the way we will look at an event. Maybe your logical approach to the game is not flawed; you do not consider that the information and what is considered as a normal event is, . a flagrant violation of reality. ? What do think about what is random
Apr 22, 2011, 6:21 am - Delta Draw - Lottery Discussion Forum

Woman sues TV station over lottery numbers errorNews Story
A Fort Lee, New Jersey, woman who says she thought fortune had smiled on her with a $250,000 winner in a 2009 Mega Millions drawing is suing WABC-TV for allegedly broadcasting the wrong winning numbers and leaving her devastated when she discovered she had won nothing. Rakel Daniele is seeking $75,000 in damages from WABC-TV, American Broadcasting Co., the Walt Disney Co. and an unidentified Jane Doe in a lawsuit that was transferred to federal District Court in Newark last week from state Su
Feb 27, 2011, 8:25 am - Todd - Lottery News

Determinism vs Randomness and ChanceReply
Indeterminism is the concept that events are not caused deterministically from prior events. Indeterminism is an event without a cause. An example of an event that is not strictly caused is one that depends on chance, like the flip of a coin. If the outcome is only probable, not certain, then the event can be said to have been caused by the coin flip, but the head or tails result was not predictable. So this causality, which recognizes prior events as causes, is undetermined. Indeter
Feb 22, 2011, 2:09 pm - Raven62 - Mathematics Forum

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
RL-RANDOMLOGIC, You said, I take 100 of so samples of different sizes from different points within my database and analyse them to see how well each sample follows the matrix and look for a margin of error from the expected. This and the rest of your posting is a paraphrase of much of what you've been writing here for months. ...a margin of error from the expected. Hmmm... You insist you don't look back, so just what are you saying here? This posting doesn't tell us anything of value, and
Jan 18, 2011, 3:03 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum