Search

Please Advise!Reply
His strings theory kicks most systems in the butt...including GH. If only he would come up with a way to fiquire which of the many numbers where the winners then he would be supreme. That's the only problem here. Just think there's 39 numbers in Ca Fantasy 5 with the strings you have most of time about 22 numbers which contain all 5 or 4 of then winning numbers no less. Then take 39-22=17 numbers you don't have to bother with...because you know most of them are losers....that's damm good.
Jul 21, 2007, 8:11 pm - knowwhen2play - Pick 5 Forum

Hackers & the lottery...Reply
There is a bit of difference between a hacker and a Lotto guru. Hackers are good at writing code and figuring out ways around security methods, part of it being social engineering (i.e calling a company and impersonating someone to get inside information). It is a lot easier to read people and get around security systems because those are not as random as a Lottery is. In Hacking you're trying to reverse engineer what already happened and in Lottery you're trying to predict the future, the harde
May 2, 2007, 8:39 pm - LckyLary - Lottery Discussion Forum

If I reduce the MM or PB number pool by half and play 3o2e/3e2o...(?)Reply
Unless the numbers you eliminate from consideration are less likely to be drawn for some reason, there's absolutley no advantage to eliminating them. That's the problem with a lot of systems. This is based off of eliminating numbers that most likely will NOT come up. Lets look at the last drawing of the MM. 17 25 36 40 43 + 09 I could eliminate *most* of those numbers from the next drawing unless one or more were considered hot or due. There is slim to NO chance of the s
Mar 20, 2007, 9:52 pm - MegaWinner - Lottery Systems Forum

At least 2 lottery winners will split record $370 million jackpotReply
Wow! Here it is almost 9:30 am on 03/07/07 and California still can't get it together to allow venders to cash any winning tickets... They can be checked, but the machine says that they cannot be paid. Is this any way to run a multibillion dollar enterprise? What ever happened to no fault computing ... Hey, how about some reduntant systems? ... like the airlines... and even they process more data than the lottery... and they do it 24/7... come on CA show us why we pay such high commissions and
Mar 7, 2007, 12:29 pm - justclayton - Lottery News

What Type of Lottery Personality are You?Reply
Respectfully speaking; I am so glad I am not the only one who does this! This happens to me with pick 4 constantly yet, it does not happen often with pick 3. However, I can play one number in P4 and before the draw, that one number has turned into 10. What happens after the draw? I am STILL one number off from a win.My biggest problem is I consider and try almost every system or trick LP members share. I think having multiple options to predict somewhat overwhelms me. Granted, backtesting is t
Jan 16, 2006, 4:26 pm - Snakeyes - Pick 3 Forum

Arlene vs. ToddReply
Not only did you give the numbers away, you also gave the states.The problem, again with this test is that you're also using her states, when you should be using your own. Those states is a part of a whole to her system. In order for you to compare systems, you should pick your own states as a part of a whole to your system.The other problem is that there is another part of a whole to her system, which includes playing those numbers in the off-shore, which she says makes the most amount of retur
Nov 24, 2005, 7:57 am - pacattack05 - Pick 3 Forum

Quickpick or QuickRIP?Reply
Well for me personally, I use my own QP computer generators, and ball machine. Although I do occasionally throw in a few terminal QPs here and there with them. So it don't really matter to me, as I already have MY numbers in the pool anyway. But I have matched most of my 4 out of 6 numbers via terminal QPs however. Regardless, any set of numbers has just as good as chance as any others. Regardless of how well you study stats, or analyze them. I don't doubt that they want to market QPs as much
Nov 10, 2005, 3:02 pm - sirbrad - Lottery Discussion Forum

MistakesReply
Well for me personally, I use my own QP computer generators, and ball machine. Although I do occasionally through in a few terminal QPs here and there with them. So it don't really matter to me, as I already have MY numbers in the pool anyway. But I have match most of my 4 out of 6 numbers via terminal QPs however. Regardless, any set of numbers has just as good as chance as any others. Regardless of how well you study stats, or analyze them.I don't doubt that they want to market QPs as much as
Nov 9, 2005, 11:39 pm - sirbrad - Lottery Discussion Forum

ldir problemReply
Fat 16 is good only for old DOS 6.22 and below and also for Win 3.1 and other old Windows operating system, maybe some of the very old Windows 95 operating systems also.Take a look at my old computer, I use Windows 98SE and it uses FAT 32, you need Fat 32 or better (Newer), Fat 16 won't do and should not run Lottery Director.FAT is the file allocation table, the Fat of your disk partition(s) must be of a kind that is able to support your operating system and the programs that you want to run (us
Jul 12, 2005, 10:07 am - LANTERN - Lottery Discussion Forum

Did you all give Adolf permission to print this stuff??Reply
Lottery Post is a free site, there is no charge to read all the forum posts. The information in the posts is being provided free to the other readers. Like writing a message in chalk on the sidewalk, yes it's your message your copyright, but you are giving it away free to all who see it. If Jay Leno says exactly what you wrote on the sidewalk, try and collect the writer's fee.Actually Adolf is giving you credit using your screen names, and looking at Dead_Aim he did register not Dead_Aim but
Jun 5, 2005, 11:56 pm - BobP - Pick 3 Forum