Search

RNG test for tennessee......Reply
Mike, What you're experiencing is what I call RNG Paranoia. It is a natural byproduct of not being able to see or verify a draw. You simply have to take their word for it and believe me it gets worse! And it is something the lotteries will never understand. EVEN if the game isn't rigged...a non-verifiable computer draw creates paranoia and undermines faith in the process. All I can say to the players in Tennesseeis: BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! Jim
Aug 10, 2007, 9:00 am - Uncle Jim - Pick 4 Forum

OMG It's horrible.Reply
Reminds me of an old TV series where the guy would get Tomorrow's Newspaper a day early and because of such, could prevent something bad from happening. Well, in one episode, it was regarding a computerized lottery that had been rigged by corrupt officials, that to insure that the pot would be returned to the state after so many games without a winner, they would make sure that the numbers drawn would NEVER match a winning ticket. Of course, as the story goes, the hero buys the winning tick
Jul 31, 2007, 8:50 am - SirMetro - Lottery Discussion Forum

will you play a lottery with computerized drawings?Reply
Think about it . The games are played on computer. The computer instantly knows what numbers were played and how any many tickets were sold. The state is out to make MONEY . Computers can be easily programmed to pick numbers with the lowest amount of winners, so the state makes more money. So, on a Cash 3 game for example, instead of Releasing a winning number with 2900 winners, it would be more advantageous to release one with a far less number say , 320 ... people won , but is it fair , No
Jul 21, 2007, 1:00 am - sector46 - Lottery Discussion Forum

i want to hear from people here if you win regular in your RNG stateReply
When I lived in California a few years ago, I won $586.00 on the cash 3 straight. The number was 026. But I didn't live there long enough to say I won regularly. I don't know which is worse, putting the balls through the wringer, pre-testing them, rotating tubes and not notifying the public of their new positions, is any worse than wondering if there might be one or two bad apples out there with RNGs, and whether someone is tampering with them. Actually, I would rather take the chance that
Jul 19, 2007, 11:27 am - pacattack05 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Random Generation of QuickpicksReply
Coin Toss, are you eggsactly sure of that? (groan) I didn't know this thread was going to begin a debate on randomness, but since it has, I don't think the lottery can be random in its purest sense for the reasons already quoted. That doesn't mean it's rigged or there is a conspiracy either. What can be really random? Haven't you ever purchased 2 of the same device (a tv or a computer) and one has more problems than the other? I guess I still can't put into words what I was trying
Jan 20, 2007, 1:51 pm - justxploring - Lottery Discussion Forum

The lotto is IMPOSSIBLE to winReply
Or I am going to think you all are RIGGED! And part of the Lottery ring. Dont you get it man! ----------------------------------------------- Of course. There's the reason. We are all part of the Lottery Ring run by the lottery companies. We just waste time on this website to pretend we want to win the lottery and find strategies. Congratulations. You've solved the LP conspiracy.
Jan 10, 2007, 9:09 pm - MillionsWanted - Lottery Systems Forum

Lucky For LifeReply
Wait a minute: Scientific Games personnel will begin installing mix match key caps on Integra terminals in early November. ?????? Translation: This is ANOTHER RIGGED Computerized game! What the heck can be so scientific about replacing ping pong balls in a tube? Answer: CONTROLLING THE OUTCOME OF DRAWINGS THROUGH SUBTLE, SOPHISTICATED SOFTWARE sold to States to MAXIMIZE their profits at players' expense! This isn't mix match ! No, this is FLIP SWITCH! For all its allege
Jan 1, 2007, 9:29 pm - Greg - Jackpot Games Forum

Fixed LotteriesReply
Yes, it was an official and host of the Pennsylvania Lottery. He weighed down every ball but the 4's and 6's. The winning number was 666 and he turned out to have thousands of dollars invested in tickets with 444, 666, 464, 646 and combinations like that. Nick Perry and some of his crooked buddies rigged the draw. Perry was sentenced to 7 years in prison and the incident was the basis for a later movie starring John Travolta. To read more on it go to: http://mmrrc.dement
Dec 12, 2006, 12:53 am - Wintariofan - Lottery Discussion Forum

The possibilities for fraud in RNG gamesReply
It would lead me to expect that we have reasonable proof that in Oregon, either the game isn't rigged or the people rigging it are extremely stupid. If you could choose the number that was drawn, would you be stupid enough to choose one that had any obvious significance? I'm guessing that on July 4th the number of people who play 1776 is a lot higher than on any other day of the year, so it certainly wouldn't be in the interest of the state to deliberately draw 1776. As far as the probabil
Jul 14, 2006, 3:44 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

quick pick or your own numbersReply
Looking at some of the posts now I know why some people have high post numbers. I'm trying my luck with quickpicks in the Canadian games so I'll see how it goes. Best I did in Powerball was 3+1 with my own numbers. Only played $20 in Mega since it arrived in WA state since I keep waiting for it to roll. Tried my own numbers in Euromillions and won exactly nothing. For the Canadian 6/49 game I picked loosing WA state quickpicks that followed a patern (other than being the wrong numbers I ho
May 2, 2006, 4:23 pm - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum