- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 1:45 am
You last visited
June 7, 2026, 2:27 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
anyone recouped cost of lottosync yet?
When you ask the question Has any one recouped the cost of lottosync yet? , do you mean winning an amount equal to the cost of the software or do you mean an amount equal to the cost to play plus the cost of the software? You'll probably have to win a jackpot to recoup your total cost, that's what I'm going to have to do and I wrote my own software. Good luck to you.RJOh
Apr 21, 2004, 4:55 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
rjoh, if guru didnt think there was a solution he wouldnt have sold lottosync which is a software for trying to predict randomness in lottery draws, i am sure he will provide sufficient evidence of this in future versions of the software. its not there yet which he will admit himself, however at least its a chance.good luck to you
Apr 17, 2004, 4:04 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
vick, i hope the keno version is worth waiting for or ill probably forget the whole lottosync circus, maybe its because my keno game is electronic, i dont know, if so perhaps the neural network thing might be worth a shot, was thinking of brainmaker or similar, arent these supposed to be quite accurate for prng prediction? anyways good luck with your 6/49.all the best
Apr 16, 2004, 1:16 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
right, i have just tested lottosync with 100 keno draws each with 4 different samples 150,400,800,1600 and i dont know what to say, except im going to wait until better versions come out especially as the highest number i achieved was 6 and to top it all off it was with the 150 sample!!! there are an awful lot of consecutive numbers appearing far to often, im going to spend the next week sleeping, to catch up!!!
Apr 15, 2004, 12:21 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
new pc for lottosync, which is best?
Vick:I would prefer a P4 before an AMD athlon. The new P4 processors use less power and produce less noise and HEAT.The optimal lottosync pc is 512mb ram with a processor as fast as you can afford. Memory and harddisk capacity are by far less important than the processor !!
Apr 14, 2004, 7:53 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
Lotto-Synchronizer has a feature similiar toLotto-Cheatah with the Sample settings because Lotto-Cheatah has Depth settings used for predicting\selecting the numbers.Different Depth settings produce different results for numbers wich seems the case in the Sample settings for LottoSync.
Apr 13, 2004, 4:35 pm - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
come on get real folks! lotto is a game of chance my feeling is that lottosync will improve my odds at winning prizes but predicting a jackpot within 10 to 20 tries i think we might be in a little bit of a dreamland!!!! lol!
Apr 12, 2004, 4:50 pm - lottosyncman - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
guru, your theory on my keno game was wrong, lottosync did not predict better results on the first draw in all occasions that were tested, using the same prediction, better results were achieved in all cases after the first draw, however in a 50 draw test they hit no more than 4 numbers.
Apr 12, 2004, 3:36 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
hi rjoh, these predictions are for the next draw, if we were to play every lottosync prediction every draw it would cost a fortune, it doesnt matter whats happened before because we wouldnt have been playing these numbers then anyway as we make a prediction for each draw. good observations though, thanksspock im thinking of playing 600 samples because it says somewhere best between 400-800 will post when prediction is finished.
Apr 12, 2004, 3:56 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
Lottosynchronizer 1.6
i am playing v1.6 using the predicted numbers in the next draw also, i am using bluskov system#115 which guarantees 3x4 if 6 from 10 in 5 lines at total cost of 10 to play. im sure guru said to play lottosync predictions in the next draw also, i cant remember.good luck all!!
Apr 5, 2004, 6:18 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
