Search

$338M NJ Powerball winner pledges to pay rent for his entire blockReply
Every time I read an article about advice from financial advisers for lottery winners they say there's no problem with using 10% to indulge yourself right off the bat. I think this guy is a bit too vocal about some of his plans, but if he pays $1500 rent for 100 people for 2 months it comes to $300k. If he hands out another $700k he'll still be a good $12 to $14 million shy of blowing through 10%. It's also worth noting that he's not just giving money to a bunch of random strangers. Most of thes
Apr 1, 2013, 1:31 am - KY Floyd - Lottery News

California family's fight over $51 million lottery jackpot is overReply
The article form May 6, 2012 states he was to sign her name not his. But as it turns out Orender signed the winning ticket in his own name and not on behalf of Etta May, the lawsuit said. https://www.lotterypost.com/news/245837
Mar 28, 2013, 11:57 am - dallascowboyfan - Lottery News

Woman opts out of lottery pool, but co-workers give her cut anywayReply
$20 each is certainly a lot of money for an office pool individual to pay for lottery tickets. It's good that they don't each spend that much money on pooled lottery tickets each week/or every other week. Congratulations to these 12 jackpot winners though! As the article indicated, it is highly aggravating when a lottery retailer (who even natively speaks and writes English) doesn't comprehend a simple request! I have, frequently, had similar problems. Consequently, I have filled out the PB a
Mar 28, 2013, 10:54 am - HaveABall - Lottery News

Lottery winner penniless after blowing through $10.5 millionReply
Hum, so net medium-multimillionaire, mass baby-making Sharon enjoys driving around her neighbors and neighboring cities while 'blasting agrivating, far-away window shaking sounds' from her vehicles. Meanwhile, her also mass baby-making husband, Vinnie, enjoys driving around those same places drunk and driving into people. According to this article, at least Sharon's six children won't be welfare recipient adults; assuming that they live until the age of 26 years old, whereby they are eligable
Mar 26, 2013, 2:37 am - HaveABall - Lottery News

Lottery winner penniless after blowing through $10.5 millionReply
I hope to win one day but I know it's very unlikely per the odds. If I did win however, I know I would be very prudent and savvy with my new wealth. I have seen way too many winners go broke. Not wanting to be on a list that includes David Edwards and the imbecile in this article would be motivation enough to manage my winnings very carefully should I ever be lucky enough to win. I just can't envision winning and losing $10 million. It's almost sacrilegious in a way. To be blessed in such a
Mar 25, 2013, 7:19 pm - hotslot3 - Lottery News

Lawmakers going after unclaimed lottery moneyReply
, golfer1960. It is necessary to return the monies into the JACKPOT of the SAME lottery game, so that the REGULAR players of THAT SAME game stand a second chance to still win those monies via a jackpot win. Regarding the idea to create a new lottery game, an annual raffle doesn't make sense/help. Since REGULAR players from the lottery games wins, which went unclaimed, NEVER played and lost via the raffle. The goal shouldn't be forcing regular players to play unbudgeted, additional, more expen
Mar 4, 2013, 5:46 pm - HaveABall - Lottery News

Would You Still Post Here If . . .Reply
I read in USA Today not too long ago that some cars already have them And that they have been used in some insurance cases , etc. , in the past Example : I was only going 45 mph when I came to that intersection ( no......the box says you were doing 75 mph ) and that you never touched a brake They rescan theirselves every so many seconds or minutes if I remember correct from the article
Feb 26, 2013, 6:49 pm - Astekblue - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
That 2004 article really changed the minds of at least two would be lottery players. Seven years later that same mathematical lottery genius didn't know what a hit/skip chart was so he couldn't figure out the probabilities. After an explanation, instead of giving any useful ideas, he chose to give his usual opinion on why playing lottery games is a bad bet. Last night someone won $89 million on probably less than a $10 bet. All the odds and probabilities against winning a huge jackpot are use
Jan 26, 2013, 7:45 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lotto System Development SimplifiedReply
Hello jimmy, perfect, good article from donald, jimmy still the lottery 6/40, but can be another Lottery, see 01 the smallest pair 12 and 28 to 40 top pair getting together to see the pair, which can be random, or two pairs of extremaidades (the pair higher with lower pair) can these two pairs give evidence of the central couple (the couple missing to complete the bet) making the lowest pair of 01 to 12 are 66 pairs but if you increase the limit increase the logicothe 66 smaller pairs you can
Jan 22, 2013, 4:30 pm - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
When you can show that your winnings are positively correlated with your Lottery IQ and not the number of tickets you purchase, publish your results and become famous. It's incredible that you would accept the self serving garbage produced by system software salespeople like Gail Howard and Ion Saliu, but reject the work of a mathematician and casino industry consultant like Don Catlin. http://catlin.casinocitytimes.com/article/lottery-nonsense-8694 --Jimmy4164
Jan 20, 2013, 4:53 am - LottoBoner - Lottery Discussion Forum